Background When working with stakeholders, context and presentation are of utmost importance since users seldom have the knowledge and motivation to comprehend and critically analyse data. This is especially so for ecologists whose knowledge is not immediately related to many of the stakeholders' daily life or economic activities and hence is often beyond - or in some cases in direct conflict with - their everyday activities. Reliance on the scientist's interpretation based on scientific analysis and its subsequent visualisation in the form of graphs, tables etc. has a number of limitations: Data is only one form of knowledge for characterising socio-ecological systems. Non-data knowledge includes both important persistent descriptive characteristics of an ecosystem ("Srebarna is a hyper-eutrophic lake"), and shared socio-cultural context implicitly acknowledged by both sides ("Bai Ganyo is an exporter of essential oil from Rosa damascena in the classic 19th century satiric fiction by Aleko Konstantinov, a part of Bulgaria's literary heritage.") Discrepancies in implicit knowledge: common scientific knowledge not explicitly mentioned in research papers whose omission deprives non-specialist readers of important context. This can cause numerous biases in verbal and written communication (Kellerman 2007, Ahlert et al. 2016). Specialisation limits the knowledge of individual scientists so their work does not contain all information about the model ecosystem that the stakeholders need for informed decision-making; larger scientific teams, on the other hand, require careful wording for clarity and brevity when communicating their finding about complex ecosystem processes. Data is only one form of knowledge for characterising socio-ecological systems. Non-data knowledge includes both important persistent descriptive characteristics of an ecosystem ("Srebarna is a hyper-eutrophic lake"), and shared socio-cultural context implicitly acknowledged by both sides ("Bai Ganyo is an exporter of essential oil from Rosa damascena in the classic 19th century satiric fiction by Aleko Konstantinov, a part of Bulgaria's literary heritage.") Discrepancies in implicit knowledge: common scientific knowledge not explicitly mentioned in research papers whose omission deprives non-specialist readers of important context. This can cause numerous biases in verbal and written communication (Kellerman 2007, Ahlert et al. 2016). Specialisation limits the knowledge of individual scientists so their work does not contain all information about the model ecosystem that the stakeholders need for informed decision-making; larger scientific teams, on the other hand, require careful wording for clarity and brevity when communicating their finding about complex ecosystem processes. Ontology-based approach to communication In this work, we present the use of machine-readable formalised ontologies that contain known and inferred facts about relations within the ecosystem in the form Subject-Predicate-Object. This form of presenting relations is significantly more expressive than the fuzzy knowledge graphs used in socio-ecological research. For example, "Pelecanus crispus had X nesting pairs in year Y" is a relationship that cannot be denoted as positive or negative in the typical fuzzy cognitive network out of the context of a dataset with Pelecanus population trends. Furthermore, ontologies allow for different relations between the same objects such as food competition between two species and expressing their taxonomic relation, annotating hierarchies such as the taxonomic relationships or the elements of a standard observation, authorship and sources, etc. in a machine readable and unambiguous manner. Our ontology production workflow uses an AI-in-the-loop extraction of information from publications, its linking to historical data and standard observation datasets (including the ones published in the eLTER data repository as open datasets), and reasoning across these sources of heterogeneous information to create a flexible representation of the ecosystem complexities. We use the Ontotext graph tools dataset - GraphDB and OntoRefine. A sufficiently comprehensive ontology can contain tens of thousands of factual and inferred relationships and by itself is not a suitable tool for stakeholder communication. However, querying the complex ontology to retrieve a subset of the knowledge therein (referred to as ontoset), allows for extracting the information pertinent to a given communication topic and its reuse for simplified but factual communication with one or more target groups. We present two cases of stakeholder communication basing on ontologies about two model ecosystems - the lake ecosystem of biosphere reserve Srebarna and the agroecosystems of the Valley of Roses. For both model ecosystems, we create ontologies from heterogeneous sources. We then proceed to extract thematic ontosets for the target audience and use the ontoset for specific communication purposes (Fig. 1). In the case of lake Srebarna, we present a set of games developed for the Science day (September, 2026) basing on a subset of the ontology about Srebarna that includes trophic and habitat interactions, historic and fun facts about Srebarna from Michev and Iliev (1982) and the experience of the Srebarna research team, as well as information about the method and significance of standard observations performed in the site. The games are intended to support system thinking and engage the most interested citizen scientists (school and university students and interested adults - teachers, parents). They can be given opportunity for job shadowing the researchers during actual fieldwork and performing simple observations. In the case of the future socio-ecological platform Valley of Roses, we present the transition from an earlier knowledge graph to an ontology containing information about the characteristic crops in the region - essential oils from Rosa damascena and Lavandula angustifolia. The ontology links the ecosystem data collected in an ongoing seed funding project to create the platform, existing data from research and other projects, as well as ecosystem information extracted from textual publications, with social and economic data derived from interviews and a survey. We present the way businesses - farmers, distilleries, traders, local tourism and attractions, can interact with rose oil ontoset, including the yield parameters for rose oil, the influence of specific pests, and links to national and international legislation, market and customer requirements and the rose as an iconic tourist attraction. The presented work demonstates a workflow for processing and semantically linking heterogeneous information from transdisciplinary research teams with AI-in-the-loop. We use a structured approach to present facts free of hallucination and context deviations - the main shortcomings of current AI models. This approach supports the formalisation and reproducibility of socio-ecologic research and stakeholder involvement using the new tools for extracting actionable insights from big data that became available in the last years.