Jia li Lu

Ms. Jia li Lu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

1Year (2026-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2026 in Sports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LJli jiahao
li jiahao
ZYZhifan Ye
Zhifan Ye
JLJia li Lu
Jia li Lu
YHYang Huizhi
Yang Huizhi
HYHuiping Yan
Huiping Yan
YLYifan Lu
Yifan Lu
Background: Physical fitness is important for health and independence in older adults, but existing systems do not always provide a continuous multidomain score. Objective: To develop and preliminarily evaluate a Physical Fitness Index (PFI) for older adults in a Chinese retirement community. Methods: A total of 561 participants aged 65–89 years completed assessments of body composition, strength, endurance, balance, mobility, and flexibility. Scores were normalized within sex and 5-year age groups and combined using a fixed radar-axis order. Results: The PFI averaged 39.24 ± 13.43 points (range, 4.16–84.47). In a reduced surrogate regression model, R2 was 0.825 and ten-fold cross-validation yielded an RMSE of 5.79 points and an MAE of 4.33 points. Conclusion: The PFI provides a continuous overall score with a domain profile, but its calibration and measurement properties require external and longitudinal validation.

18 September 2026 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LJli jiahao
li jiahao
YHYang Huizhi
Yang Huizhi
HZHefu Zhen
Hefu Zhen
ZLZhiming Li
Zhiming Li
JLJia li Lu
Jia li Lu
YLYifan Lu
Yifan Lu
Background: Multidimensional evidence on exercise participation and frailty in older adults is limited. Methods: This 12-week preference-based, non-randomized study included 145 participants (mean age 82.25 years): walking (n = 50), resistance training (n = 20), Traditional Chinese exercise (n = 23), and control (n = 52). Frailty was the primary outcome; physical-performance and molecular analyses were exploratory. Paired trajectories, baseline-stratified binary transitions, and adjusted associations were examined. Results: Among paired participants, pre-frailty/frailty prevalence changed from 70.0% to 60.0% with walking, 90.0% to 70.0% with resistance training, 50.0% to 63.6% with Traditional Chinese exercise (n = 22), and 50.0% to 69.2% in controls. Baseline status constrained opportunities for binary improvement or deterioration. All adjusted frailty risk-ratio confidence intervals included 1. Walking was associated with faster Timed Up and Go and Five-Yard Walk Test performance after correction across eight outcomes. Molecular changes also occurred in controls; intervention timing and potential laboratory-batch confounding limited between-group interpretation. No microbiome taxon survived multiplicity correction; small paired samples limited precision. Conclusions: Walking and resistance-training groups showed descriptively more favorable prevalence trajectories, but adjusted frailty comparisons remained inconclusive. These findings do not establish frailty prevention, modality superiority, or exercise-specific molecular mechanisms.