We present a comprehensive inventory of amphibians from Panna Tiger Reserve in Madhya Pradesh based on morphological, molecular and bioacoustic data. Representatives of 15 anuran species were collected, corresponding to roughly four fifths of the known amphibian species of Madhya Pradesh. The main results of this study are: (1) Description of advertisement calls of eleven species, including the first-time description of advertisement calls of Sphaerotheca pashchima. (2) Identification of cryptic species using acoustic and molecular techniques. (3) Five new significant range extensions and new state records. (4) Description of geographical variation in call properties in three anuran species. This study also provides morphological descriptions with ecological and natural history notes for each species that may be useful in management planning for amphibian conservation in Panna Tiger Reserve.

Animal translocations provide striking examples of the human footprint on biodiversity. Combining continental-wide genomic and DNA-barcoding analyses, we reconstructed the historical biogeography of the Asian black-spined toad (Duttaphrynus melanostictus), a toxic commensal amphibian that currently threatens two biodiversity hotspots through biological invasions (Wallacea and Madagascar). The results emphasize a complex diversification shaped by speciation and mitochondrial introgression that comprises two distinct species. One species (true D. melanostictus) is distributed in the Indian subcontinent and is invasive in Wallacea. The other species, whose nomenclature remains unsettled, diverged from D. melanostictus in the Miocene era (~7 Mya) and diversified across Southeast Asia, from where it was introduced to Madagascar. Remarkably, the Indonesian population of D. melanostictus was recently established from India, which suggests historical, possibly human-assisted dispersal across the Bay of Bengal, reflecting the centuries-old connection between these regions.

A known haven of amphibian diversity, South Asia is also a hotspot of taxonomic confusions. Vastly distributed from Saudi Arabia to Myanmar, the dicroglossid genus Euphlyctis (“skittering” or “skipper” frogs) is a representative example. Combining phylogenetic analyses with 16S barcoding and genome size variation of 403 frogs from 136 localities, we examined genetic diversity and distributions across the whole range of Euphlyctis, with a particular focus on taxonomic and nomenclatural issues. We recovered two deeply divergent mitochondrial clades totalling ten lineages that we considered as species, and eight could be attributed valid taxonomic names and junior synonyms. The first clade (subgenus Phrynoderma) is confirmed in South India, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, and comprises six species: E. karaavali, E. hexadactyla, E. aloysii, E. kerala and two undescribed taxa. Five are endemic to the Western Ghats biodiversity hotspot and four of them form the E. aloysii species complex. The second clade (subgenus Euphlyctis) extends across South Asia and neighbouring regions, and comprises four species: E. ehrenbergii, E. jaladhara, and two widespread lineages erroneously called “E. mudigere” and “E. kalasgramensis” in recent literature, while their oldest valid names appear to be E. cyanophlyctis and E. adolfi, respectively. Additional analyses on this pair of taxa highlighted strong phenotypic resemblance, notable intraspecific phylogeographic structure, and an extensive contact zone along the southern slopes of the Himalaya, with putative signs of genetic introgression. Through an independent investigation of the historical literature, we identified overlooked issues and misconceptions regarding the status of many old and recent taxa, and proposed solutions, such as transferring “E. ghoshi” to the genus Limnonectes. Our study illustrates how range-wide genetic barcoding can clarify taxonomic confusions, and we call to solve remaining issues prior to the description of new taxa.

It is important to describe lineages before they go extinct, as we can only protect what we know. This is especially important in the case of microendemic species likely to be relict populations, such as Hynobius salamanders in southern China. Here, we unexpectedly sampled Hynobius individuals in Fujian province, China, and then worked on determining their taxonomic status. We describe Hynobius bambusicolus sp. nov. based on molecular and morphological data. The lineage is deeply divergent and clusters with the other southern Chinese Hynobius species based on the concatenated mtDNA gene fragments (>1500 bp), being the sister group to H. amjiensis based on the COI gene fragment, despite their geographic distance. In terms of morphology, the species can be identified through discrete characters enabling identification in the field by eye, an unusual convenience in Hynobius species. In addition, we noted some interesting life history traits in the species, such as vocalization and cannibalism. The species is likely to be incredibly rare, over a massively restricted distribution, fitting the definition of Critically Endangered following several lines of criteria and categories of the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.

Rashtrapati Bhavan Estates is a large semi-natural area comprising significant patches of secondary forest, cultivation, wetlands and parks in the heart of Delhi, the capital city of India. An inventory of herpetofauna was undertaken from May 15 to July 31, 2015, which revealed four species of amphibians and eight of reptiles. One reptilian species—Striped Keelback—was a new record for the Delhi region. In addition, secondary records of the presence of five snake species were obtained. Given the paucity of published data on natural history of the national capital, this annotated species checklist assumes importance and will be of use for urban planning and conservation.

In a recent study, Hortal et al. (2015) recognized seven shortfalls of knowledge that hamper our understanding of biodiversity. Three of these are of particular importance for drawing conservation strategies for ecological indicator species, among which we can count the amphibians (Simon et al. 2011): the Linnean shortfall describes ‘the knowledge incongruity between the described species and the remaining species yet to be described’ (Brown & Lomolino 1998); the Wallacean shortfall defines ‘paucity of knowledge about the actual distribution range of the species’ (Lomolino 2004); and the Darwinian shortfall refers to ‘lack of knowledge about the tree of life and evolution of lineages, species and traits’ (Diniz-Filho et al. 2013).