Siwei Pan

Dr. Siwei Pan


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 September 2019 in Cancer Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SPSiwei Pan
Siwei Pan
PWPengliang Wang
Pengliang Wang
YXyanan xing
yanan xing
KLKai Li
Kai Li
ZWZhenning Wang
Zhenning Wang
ZZZhi Zhu
Zhi Zhu
Background: The optimal number of retrieved lymph nodes (LNs) in gastric cancer (GC) is still debatable and previous studies proposing new classification alternatives mostly focused on the number of retrieved LNs without proper consideration on the anatomic nodal groups’ location. Here, we assessed the impact of retrieved LNs from different nodal location groups on the survival of GC patients. Methods: Stage I–III gastric cancer patients who had radical gastrectomy were investigated. LN grouping was determined according to the 13th edition of the JCGC. The optimal cut‐off values of retrieved LNs in different LN groups (Group 1 and 2) were calculated, based on which a proposed nodal classification (rN) simultaneously accounting the optimal number and location of retrieved LNs was proposed. The performance of rN was then compared to that of LN ratio, log‐odds of metastatic LNs (LODDs) and the 8th edition of the Union for International Cancer Control/American Joint Committee on Cancer (UICC/AJCC) N classification. Results: The optimal cut‐off values for Group 1 and 2 were 13 and 9, respectively. The 5‐year overall survival (OS) was higher for patients in retrieved Group 1 LNs > 13 (vs. Group 1 LNs ≤ 13, 63.2% vs. 57.9%, P = 0.005) and retrieved Group 2 LNs > 9 (vs. Group 2 LNs ≤ 9, 72.5% vs. 60.7%, P = 0.009). Patients staged as pN0–3b were sub classified using this Group 1 and 2 nodal analogy. The OS of pN0–N2 patients in retrieved Group 1 LNs > 13 or Group 2 LNs > 9 were superior to those in retrieved Group 1 LNs ≤ 13 and Group 2 LNs ≤ 9 (All P < 0.05); except for pN3 patients. The rN classification was formulated and demonstrated better 5‐year OS prognostication performance as compared to the LNR, LODDs, and the 8th UICC/AJCC N staging system. Conclusions: The retrieval of > 13 and > 9 LNs for Group 1 and Group 2, respectively, could represent an alternative lymph node retrieval approach in radical gastrectomy for more precise survival prognostication and minimizing staging migration, especially if > 16 LNs is found to be difficult.

25 February 2017 in Chemical Papers
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HLHonghu Li
Honghu Li
SWShengkai Wang
Shengkai Wang
Xu WangXu Wang
Xu Wang
NTNian Tang
Nian Tang
SPSiwei Pan
Siwei Pan
JHJiangjun Hu
Jiangjun Hu


22 January 2019 in Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SPSiwei Pan
Siwei Pan
PWPeng-Liang Wang
Peng-Liang Wang
HHHan-Wei Huang
Han-Wei Huang
LLLei Luo
Lei Luo
XWXin Wang
Xin Wang
XHXu Huimian
Xu Huimian
Background. In gastric cancer, various surveillance strategies are suggested in international guidelines. The current study is intended to evaluate the current strategies and provide more personalized proposals for personalized cancer medicine. Materials and Methods. In the aggregate, 9191 patients with gastric cancer after gastrectomy from 1998 to 2009 were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Disease-specific survival was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to confirm the independent prognostic factors. As well, hazard ratio (HR) curves were used to compare the risk of death over time. Conditional survival (CS) was applied to dynamically assess the prognosis after each follow-up. Results. Comparisons from HR curves on different stages showed that earlier stages had distinctly lower HR than advanced stages. The curve of stage IIA was flat and more likely the same as that of stage I while that of stage IIB is like that of stage III with an obvious peak. After estimating CS at intervals of three months, six months, and 12 months in different periods, stages I and IIA had high levels of CS all along, while there were visible differences among CS levels of stages IIB and III. Conclusions. The frequency of follow-up for early stages, like stages I and IIA, could be every six months or longer in the first three years and annually thereafter. And those with unfavorable conditions, such as stages IIB and III, could be followed up much more frequently and sufficiently than usual.

23 July 2025 in npj Precision Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JHJingyang He
Jingyang He
JXJingli Xu
Jingli Xu
WCWujie Chen
Wujie Chen
MCMengxuan Cao
Mengxuan Cao
JZJiaqing Zhang
Jiaqing Zhang
CHCan Hu
Can Hu
Early detection and precise preoperative staging of early gastric cancer (EGC) are critical. Therefore, this study aims to develop a deep learning model using portal venous phase CT images to accurately distinguish EGC without lymph node metastasis. This study included 3164 patients with gastric cancer (GC) who underwent radical surgery at two medical centers in China from 2006 to 2019. Moreover, 2.5D radiomic data and multi-instance learning (MIL) were novel approaches applied in this study. By basing the selection of features on 2.5D radiomic data and MIL, the ResNet101 model combined with the XGBoost model represented a satisfactory performance for diagnosing pT1N0 GC. Furthermore, the 2.5D MIL-based model demonstrated a markedly superior predictive performance compared to traditional radiomics models and clinical models. We first constructed a deep learning prediction model based on 2.5D radiomics and MIL for effectively diagnosing pT1N0 GC patients, which provides valuable information for the individualized treatment selection.

29 April 2025 in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KSKe Shen
Ke Shen
CHCan Hu
Can Hu
YZYanqiang Zhang
Yanqiang Zhang
XCXiangdong Cheng
Xiangdong Cheng
ZXZhiyuan Xu
Zhiyuan Xu
SPSiwei Pan
Siwei Pan