KYRIAKI PAPADOPOULOU

Dr. KYRIAKI PAPADOPOULOU

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 November 2023 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EFElena Fountzilas
Elena Fountzilas
KPKYRIAKI PAPADOPOULOU
KYRIAKI PAPADOPOULOU
TCThomas Chatzikonstantinou
Thomas Chatzikonstantinou
GKGEORGIOS KARAKATSOULIS
GEORGIOS KARAKATSOULIS
PCPANTELIS CONSTANTOULAKIS
PANTELIS CONSTANTOULAKIS
MLMichalis Liontos
Michalis Liontos
Our aim was to evaluate the concordance between the Myriad MyChoice and two alternative homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) assays (AmoyDx HRD Focus NGS Panel and OncoScan™) in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Tissue samples from 50 patients with newly diagnosed EOC and known Myriad MyChoice HRD status were included. DNA aliquots from tumor samples, previously evaluated with Myriad MyChoice and centrally reassessed, were distributed to laboratories to assess their HRD status using the two platforms, after being blinded for the Myriad MyChoice CDx HRD status. The primary endpoint was the concordance between Myriad MyChoice and each alternative assay. Tumor samples were evaluated with an AmoyDx® HRD Focus Panel (n = 50) and with OncoScan™ (n = 43). Both platforms provided results for all tumors. Analysis showed that correlation was high for the Myriad MyChoice GI score and AmoyDx® HRD Focus Panel (r = 0.79) or OncoScan™ (r = 0.87) (continuous variable). The overall percent agreement (OPA) between Myriad MyChoice GI status (categorical variable) and each alternative assay was 83.3% (68.6–93.3%) with AmoyDx and 77.5% (61.5–89.2%) with OncoScan™. The OPA in HRD status between Myriad MyChoice and AmoyDx was 88.6% (75.4–96.2). False-positive rates were 31.6% (6/19) for AmoyDx GI status and 31.9% (7/22) for OncoScan™, while false-negative rates were 0% (0/28, AmoyDx) and 11.1% (2/18, OncoScan™) compared with the Myriad MyChoice GI status. While substantial concordance between Myriad MyChoice and alternative assays was demonstrated, prospective validation of the analytical performance and clinical relevance of these assays is warranted.

1 January 2021 in Human Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KCKyriakos Chatzopoulos
Kyriakos Chatzopoulos
VKVassiliki Kotoula
Vassiliki Kotoula
GKGeorgia-Angeliki Koliou
Georgia-Angeliki Koliou
EGEleni Giannoulatou
Eleni Giannoulatou
KPKYRIAKI PAPADOPOULOU
KYRIAKI PAPADOPOULOU
George FountzilasGeorge Fountzilas
George Fountzilas

1 May 2019 in Translational Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PEPanagiota Economopoulou
Panagiota Economopoulou
VKVassiliki Kotoula
Vassiliki Kotoula
GKGeorgia-Angeliki Koliou
Georgia-Angeliki Koliou
KPKYRIAKI PAPADOPOULOU
KYRIAKI PAPADOPOULOU
CCChristos Christodoulou
Christos Christodoulou
George FountzilasGeorge Fountzilas
George Fountzilas
Src, CDKN1B, and JAK2 play a crucial role in the coordination of cell signaling pathways. In the present study, we aim to investigate the prognostic significance of these biomarkers in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients treated with trastuzumab (T). Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue samples from 197 patients with HER2-positive MBC treated with T were retrospectively collected. All tissue samples were centrally assessed for ER, PgR, Ki67, HER2, and PTEN protein expression; EGFR gene amplification; PI3KCA mutational status; and tumor-infiltrating lympocytes density. Src, CDKN1B, and JAK2 mRNA expression was evaluated using quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Only 133 of the 197 patients (67.5%) were found to be HER2-positive by central assessment. CDKN1B mRNA expression was strongly correlated with Src (rho = 0.71) and JAK2 (rho = 0.54). In HER2-positive patients, low CDKN1B conferred higher risk for progression [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-2.32, P = .018]. In HER2-negative patients, low Src was associated with longer survival (HR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.32-0.99, P = .045). Upon multivariate analyses, only low CDKN1B and JAK2 mRNA expression remained unfavorable factors for PFS in de novo and relapsed (R)-MBC patients, respectively (HR = 2.36, 95% CI 1.01-5.48, P = .046 and HR = 1.76, 95% CI 1.01-3.06, P = .047, respectively). Low CDKN1B and JAK2 mRNA expressions were unfavorable prognosticators in a cohort of T-treated MBC patients. Our results suggest that CDKN1B and JAK2, if validated, may serve as prognostic factors potentially implicated in T resistance, which seems to be associated with distinct pathways in de novo and R-MBC.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EFElena Fountzilas
Elena Fountzilas
MKMaria Kouspou
Maria Kouspou
Alexia EliadesAlexia Eliades
Alexia Eliades
KPKYRIAKI PAPADOPOULOU
KYRIAKI PAPADOPOULOU
EBEvangelos Bournakis
Evangelos Bournakis
Philippos C. PatsalisPhilippos C. Patsalis
Philippos C. Patsalis
The data on tumor molecular profiling of European patients with prostate cancer is limited. Our aim was to evaluate the prevalence and prognostic and predictive values of gene alterations in unselected patients with prostate cancer. The presence of gene alterations was assessed in patients with histologically confirmed prostate cancer using the ForeSENTIA® Prostate panel (Medicover Genetics), targeting 36 clinically relevant genes and microsatellite instability testing. The primary endpoint was the prevalence of gene alterations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes. Overall, 196 patients with prostate cancer were evaluated (median age 72.2 years, metastatic disease in 141 (71.9%) patients). Gene alterations were identified in 120 (61%) patients, while alteration in HRR genes were identified in 34 (17.3%) patients. The most commonly mutated HRR genes were ATM (17, 8.7%), BRCA2 (9, 4.6%) and BRCA1 (4, 2%). The presence of HRR gene alterations was not associated with advanced stage (p = 0.21), age at diagnosis (p = 0.28), Gleason score (p = 0.17) or overall survival (HR 0.72; 95% CI: 0.41–1.26; p = 0.251). We identified clinically relevant somatic gene alterations in European patients with prostate cancer. These molecular alterations have prognostic significance and therapeutic implications and/or may trigger genetic testing in selected patients. In the era of precision medicine, prospective research on the predictive role of these alterations for innovative treatments or their combinations is warranted.

28 April 2020 in Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EPEirini Pectasides
Eirini Pectasides
ICIoannis Chatzidakis
Ioannis Chatzidakis
VKVassiliki Kotoula
Vassiliki Kotoula
GKGeorgia-Angeliki Koliou
Georgia-Angeliki Koliou
KPKYRIAKI PAPADOPOULOU
KYRIAKI PAPADOPOULOU
George FountzilasGeorge Fountzilas
George Fountzilas
Background/Aim: Early-stage gastric cancer has a high risk of recurrence, despite trimodality therapy with surgery, chemotherapy and radiation. To improve patient selection for adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, we evaluated the prognostic significance of immunohistochemical and genetic biomarkers in patients with resected gastric adenocarcinoma. Patients and Methods: Tumors from 119 patients were subjected to immunohistochemistry for 12 protein biomarkers, as well as next-generation sequencing. Clinical and biomarker data were available for 91 patients. Results: EBV-positive tumors and tumors with mutations had higher intratumoral CD8 tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte density (p=0.009 and p=0.017, respectively). PIK3CA mutations were correlated with VEGFA overexpression (p=0.042), while KRAS mutations and HER2 expression were mutually exclusive (p=0.036). PTEN expression univariately confirmed longer overall survival (HR=0.27; p=0.046), while there was a trend between the presence of KRAS mutations and inferior disease-free and overall survival. Conclusion: PTEN protein expression and KRAS mutations may predict disease outcome in early-stage gastric cancer. These results need to be further validated in larger cohorts.

25 July 2025 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Helena LinardouHelena Linardou
Helena Linardou
KPKYRIAKI PAPADOPOULOU
KYRIAKI PAPADOPOULOU
NKNikolaos Korfiatis
Nikolaos Korfiatis
AGAnna Goussia
Anna Goussia
ESEpaminondas Samantas
Epaminondas Samantas
Giannis MountziosGiannis Mountzios
Giannis Mountzios
Extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) has poor prognosis, and first-line chemo-immunotherapy is now the standard-of-care. We hypothesized that intercalated immunotherapy administration in-between chemotherapy cycles, at maximal neoantigen release, might enhance immune response and efficacy. PAVE is a multicenter phase II study. Patients with untreated ES-SCLC received standard platinum-etoposide every three weeks for 4-6 cycles. Avelumab 10mg/kg was administered every two weeks from cycle 3 until chemotherapy completion, and as maintenance thereafter. The primary endpoint was one-year PFS. Genotyping of FFPE tumors via targeted NGS, assessment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and analysis of CD8 and PD-L1, was performed. Between September 2018-September 2020, 55 pts, median age 65.9 years, 67.3 % male, were enrolled. With median follow-up of 10.3 months, 1-year PFS was 12.7 %, median PFS 5.8 months, 1-year OS 38.2 %, median OS 10.3 months. ORR was 69.1 % (CR 5.5 %, PR 63.6 %), median DoR 5.6 months. AEs grade 3-4 occurred in 56 % of patients. QoL, global health status and disease-related symptoms were significantly improved from baseline. The presence of TILs/CD8 in tumour was not significantly associated with survival. All but one tumor carried genetic alterations, with TP53 (89.5 %), RB1 (57.9 %), NOTCH (31.6 %) and MYC (23.7 %) being the most frequently mutated genes. Liver metastases, RB1 or TP53/RB1 co-mutations, no PCI and age > 65 years were negative PFS/ OS prognosticators. There were 10 Long Term Survivors (LTS) identified, the majority < 65 years old and most with ≤ 3 metastatic sites (50 %). Median OS of the LTS was 34.2 months and median PFS 19.9 months. Intercalated avelumab administration with chemotherapy did not meet the primary endpoint of 1-year PFS. However, our results suggest that this approach demonstrates clinically relevant PFS, DoR, and improved QoL, with overall outcomes similar to those seen with standard frontline chemotherapy in historical controls.