Elisabeth Oberzaucher

Dr. Elisabeth Oberzaucher


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 March 2017 in Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ASAgnieszka Sorokowska
Agnieszka Sorokowska
PSPiotr Sorokowski
Piotr Sorokowski
PHPeter Hilpert
Peter Hilpert
KCKatarzyna Cantarero
Katarzyna Cantarero
TFTomasz Frackowiak
Tomasz Frackowiak
JPJr. John D. Pierce
Jr. John D. Pierce
Human spatial behavior has been the focus of hundreds of previous research studies. However, the conclusions and generalizability of previous studies on interpersonal distance preferences were limited by some important methodological and sampling issues. The objective of the present study was to compare preferred interpersonal distances across the world and to overcome the problems observed in previous studies. We present an extensive analysis of interpersonal distances over a large data set (N = 8,943 participants from 42 countries). We attempted to relate the preferred social, personal, and intimate distances observed in each country to a set of individual characteristics of the participants, and some attributes of their cultures. Our study indicates that individual characteristics (age and gender) influence interpersonal space preferences and that some variation in results can be explained by temperature in a given region. We also present objective values of preferred interpersonal distances in different regions, which might be used as a reference data point in future studies.

28 November 2006 in Journal of The Royal Society Interface
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DPDustin J Penn
Dustin J Penn
EOElisabeth Oberzaucher
Elisabeth Oberzaucher
KGKarl Grammer
Karl Grammer
GFGottfried Fischer
Gottfried Fischer
HSHelena A Soini
Helena A Soini
RBRichard G Brereton
Richard G Brereton
Individuals are thought to have their own distinctive scent, analogous to a signature or fingerprint. To test this idea, we collected axillary sweat, urine and saliva from 197 adults from a village in the Austrian Alps, taking five sweat samples per subject over 10 weeks using a novel skin sampling device. We analysed samples using stir bar sorptive extraction in connection with thermal desorption gas chromatograph–mass spectrometry (GC–MS), and then we statistically analysed the chromatographic profiles using pattern recognition techniques. We found more volatile compounds in axillary sweat than in urine or saliva, and among these we found 373 peaks that were consistent over time (detected in four out of five samples per individual). Among these candidate compounds, we found individually distinct and reproducible GC–MS fingerprints, a reproducible difference between the sexes, and we identified the chemical structures of 44 individual and 12 gender-specific volatile compounds. These individual compounds provide candidates for major histocompatibility complex and other genetically determined odours. This is the first study on human axillary odour to sample a large number of subjects, and our findings are relevant to understanding the chemical nature of human odour, and efforts to design electronic sensors (e-nose) for biometric fingerprinting and disease diagnoses.

20 March 2020 in Psychological Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KWKathryn V. Walter
Kathryn V. Walter
DCDaniel Conroy-Beam
Daniel Conroy-Beam
DBDavid M. Buss
David M. Buss
KAKelly Asao
Kelly Asao
ASAgnieszka Sorokowska
Agnieszka Sorokowska
MZMaja Zupančič
Maja Zupančič
Considerable research has examined human mate preferences across cultures, finding universal sex differences in preferences for attractiveness and resources as well as sources of systematic cultural variation. Two competing perspectives—an evolutionary psychological perspective and a biosocial role perspective—offer alternative explanations for these findings. However, the original data on which each perspective relies are decades old, and the literature is fraught with conflicting methods, analyses, results, and conclusions. Using a new 45-country sample (N = 14,399), we attempted to replicate classic studies and test both the evolutionary and biosocial role perspectives. Support for universal sex differences in preferences remains robust: Men, more than women, prefer attractive, young mates, and women, more than men, prefer older mates with financial prospects. Cross-culturally, both sexes have mates closer to their own ages as gender equality increases. Beyond age of partner, neither pathogen prevalence nor gender equality robustly predicted sex differences or preferences across countries.

1 November 2012 in Evolution and Human Behavior
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LPLena S. Pflüger
Lena S. Pflüger
EOElisabeth Oberzaucher
Elisabeth Oberzaucher
SKStanislav Katina
Stanislav Katina
IHIris J. Holzleitner
Iris J. Holzleitner
KGKarl Grammer
Karl Grammer

31 August 2010 in Journal of Chemical Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HSHelena A. Soini
Helena A. Soini
IKIveta Klouckova
Iveta Klouckova
DWDonald Wiesler
Donald Wiesler
EOElisabeth Oberzaucher
Elisabeth Oberzaucher
KGKarl Grammer
Karl Grammer
MNMilos V. Novotny
Milos V. Novotny

20 September 2008 in Human Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SWSonja Windhager
Sonja Windhager
DSDennis E. Slice
Dennis E. Slice
KSKatrin Schaefer
Katrin Schaefer
EOElisabeth Oberzaucher
Elisabeth Oberzaucher
TTTruls Thorstensen
Truls Thorstensen
KGKarl Grammer
Karl Grammer