Ulrike Kuchler

Dr. Ulrike Kuchler


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 October 2013 in Journal of Dental Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DBD. Buser
D. Buser
VCV. Chappuis
V. Chappuis
UKUlrike Kuchler
Ulrike Kuchler
MBMichael M Bornstein
Michael M Bornstein
JWJ.G. Wittneben
J.G. Wittneben
UBU.C. Belser
U.C. Belser
In this prospective case series study, 20 patients with an implant-borne single crown following early implant placement with simultaneous contour augmentation were followed for 6 years. Clinical, radiologic, and esthetic parameters were assessed. In addition, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was used at 6 years to examine the facial bone wall. During the study period, all 20 implants were successfully integrated, and the clinical parameters remained stable over time. Pleasing esthetic outcomes were noted, as assessed by the pink esthetic scores. None of the implants developed mucosal recession of 1 mm or more. The periapical radiographs yielded stable peri-implant bone levels, with a mean DIB of 0.44 mm at 6 years. The CBCT scans showed that all 20 implants had a detectable facial bone wall at 6 years, with a mean thickness of around 1.9 mm. In summary, this prospective case series study demonstrated stable peri-implant hard and soft tissues for all 20 implants, and pleasing esthetic outcomes overall. The follow-up of 6 years confirmed that the risk for mucosal recession is low with early implant placement. In addition, contour augmentation with guided bone regeneration (GBR) was able to establish and maintain a facial bone wall in all 20 patients.

1 January 2014 in The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMichael M Bornstein
Michael M Bornstein
BABilal Al-Nawas
Bilal Al-Nawas
UKUlrike Kuchler
Ulrike Kuchler
ATAli Tahmaseb
Ali Tahmaseb

22 April 2015 in Clinical Oral Implants Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
UKUlrike Kuchler
Ulrike Kuchler
VCVivianne Chappuis
Vivianne Chappuis
RGReinhard Gruber
Reinhard Gruber
NLNiklaus P. Lang
Niklaus P. Lang
GSGiovanni Salvi
Giovanni Salvi

1 January 2015 in The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OBOdette Brügger
Odette Brügger
MBMichael M Bornstein
Michael M Bornstein
UKUlrike Kuchler
Ulrike Kuchler
SJSimone Janner
Simone Janner
VCVivianne Chappuis
Vivianne Chappuis
DBDaniel Buser
Daniel Buser
Odette Engel Br?gger, Dr Med Dent/Michael M. Bornstein, Prof Dr Med Dent/Ulrike Kuchler, Dr Med, Dr Med Dent/Simone F. M. Janner, Dr Med Dent/Vivianne Chappuis, Dr Med Dent/Daniel Buser, Prof Dr Med Dent: Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze the patient pool referred to a specialty clinic for implant surgery over a 3-year period. Materials and Methods: All patients receiving dental implants between 2008 and 2010 at the Department of Oral Surgery and Stomatology were included in the study. As primary outcome parameters, the patients were analyzed according to the following criteria: age, sex, systemic diseases, and indication for therapy. For the inserted implants, the type of surgical procedure, the types of implants placed, postsurgical complications, and early failures were recorded. A logistic regression analysis was performed to identify possible local and systemic risk factors for complications. As a secondary outcome, data regarding demographics and surgical procedures were compared with the findings of a historic study group (2002 to 2004). Results: A total of 1,568 patients (792 women and 776 men; mean age, 52.6 years) received 2,279 implants. The most frequent indication was a single-tooth gap (52.8%). Augmentative procedures were performed in 60% of the cases. Tissue-level implants (72.1%) were more frequently used than bone-level implants (27.9%). Regarding dimensions of the implants, a diameter of 4.1 mm (59.7%) and a length of 10 mm (55.0%) were most often utilized. An early failure rate of 0.6% was recorded (13 implants). Patients were older and received more implants in the maxilla, and the complexity of surgical interventions had increased when compared to the patient pool of 2002 to 2004. Conclusion: Implant therapy performed in a surgical specialty clinic utilizing strict patient selection and evidence-based surgical protocols showed a very low early failure rate of 0.6%.

1 January 2014 in The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
UKUlrike Kuchler
Ulrike Kuchler
TAThomas Arx
Thomas Arx
Ulrike Kuchler, MD, DMD/Thomas von Arx, DMD: Purpose: To systematically review clinical studies examining the survival and success rates of implants in horizontal ridge augmentation, either prior to or in conjunction with implant placement in the anterior maxilla. Materials and Methods: A literature search was undertaken up to September 2012 including clinical studies in English with ≥ 10 consecutively treated patients and a mean follow-up of at least 12 months. Two reviewers screened the pertinent articles and extracted the data. Key words focused on the outcome parameters (implant success, implant survival, horizontal bone gain, and intra- and postoperative complications) in studies utilizing either a simultaneous approach (ridge augmentation performed at the time of implant placement) or a staged approach (ridge augmentation performed prior to implant placement) were analyzed. Results: A total of 13 studies met the inclusion criteria, with 2 studies in the simultaneous group and 11 studies in the staged group. In the simultaneous group, survival rates of implants were 100% in both studies, with one study also reporting a 100% implant success rate. No data on horizontal bone gain were available. In the staged group, success rates of implants placed in horizontally augmented ridges ranged from 96.8% to 100% (two studies), and survival rates ranged from 93.5% to 100% (five studies). However, follow-up periods differed widely (up to 4.1 years). Mean horizontal bone gain determined at reentry (implant placement) ranged from 3.4 to 5.0 mm with large overall variations (0 to 9.8 mm, five studies). Intraoperative complications were not reported. Postsurgical complications included mainly mucosal dehiscences (five studies), and, occasionally, complete failures of block grafts were described in one study. Conclusions: Staged and simultaneous augmentation procedures in the anterior maxilla are both associated with high implant success and survival rates. The level of evidence, however, is better for the staged approach than for the simultaneous one.

4 April 2014 in International Journal of Oral Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
UKUlrike Kuchler
Ulrike Kuchler
USUwe Yacine Schwarze
Uwe Yacine Schwarze
TDToni Dobsak
Toni Dobsak
PHPatrick Heimel
Patrick Heimel
DBDieter D Bosshardt
Dieter D Bosshardt
RGReinhard Gruber
Reinhard Gruber
Sclerostin is a Wnt signalling antagonist that controls bone metabolism. Sclerostin is expressed by osteocytes and cementocytes; however, its role in the formation of dental structures remains unclear. Here, we analysed the mandibles of sclerostin knockout mice to determine the influence of sclerostin on dental structures and dimensions using histomorphometry and micro-computed tomography (μCT) imaging. μCT and histomorphometric analyses were performed on the first lower molar and its surrounding structures in mice lacking a functional sclerostin gene and in wild-type controls. μCT on six animals in each group revealed that the dimension of the basal bone as well as the coronal and apical part of alveolar part increased in the sclerostin knockout mice. No significant differences were observed for the tooth and pulp chamber volume. Descriptive histomorphometric analyses of four wild-type and three sclerostin knockout mice demonstrated an increased width of the cementum and a concomitant moderate decrease in the periodontal space width. Taken together, these results suggest that the lack of sclerostin mainly alters the bone and cementum phenotypes rather than producing abnormalities in tooth structures such as dentin.