Truls Gjestland

Dr. Truls Gjestland

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2016 in Building and Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Jian KangJian Kang
Jian Kang
Francesco AlettaFrancesco Aletta
Francesco Aletta
Truls GjestlandTruls Gjestland
Truls Gjestland
ABAlan Lex Brown
Alan Lex Brown
DBDick Botteldooren
Dick Botteldooren
LLLisa Lavia
Lisa Lavia

Truls GjestlandTruls Gjestland
Truls Gjestland
The new WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region have recommendations for limiting noise exposure associated with adverse health effects. The limits are said to be based on a systematic review of existing evidence. This paper gives a systematic assessment of the presented evidence with respect to annoyance from aircraft noise. The new guidelines have been based on the results from a selection of existing aircraft noise studies. This paper demonstrates that a similar selection of other existing post-2000 studies will yield very different results. In addition, the validity of the presented evidence has been questioned as some of the referenced studies have not been conducted according to standardized methods, and the selection of respondents is not representative of the general airport population.

1 May 2015 in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Truls GjestlandTruls Gjestland
Truls Gjestland
TNThu Lan Nguyen
Thu Lan Nguyen
TYTakashi Yano
Takashi Yano
Social surveys on noise annoyance have been conducted in five different cities in Vietnam. The surveys included both aircraft noise (three airports) and road traffic noise (five cities). The main objective for these studies was to establish dose-response functions that were representative for Vietnam. The results have been compared with results from similar surveys from other regions. Dose-response functions for aircraft noise in Vietnam showing the percentage of highly annoyed people versus the noise level are nearly identical to those presented in the European Noise Directive [European Commission (2002). http://ec.europa.eu/environment/noise/directive.htm]. For road traffic noise, however, the results indicate that people in Vietnam are more tolerant. The noise levels can be increased by 5–10 dB in order to have a response similar to the curve recommended by the European Commission.

Truls GjestlandTruls Gjestland
Truls Gjestland
Sixty-one social surveys on annoyance caused by road traffic noise conducted world-wide over a period of forty-five years have been re-analyzed by various means for possible temporal trends. Eighteen of these surveys were conducted after 2000. People’s reactions to road traffic noise seem to have been stable across the study period. No indications were found that would warrant revision of the current EU reference curve for predicting the annoyance from road traffic noise.

1 November 2012 in Noise and Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Takashi YanoTakashi Yano
Takashi Yano
Truls GjestlandTruls Gjestland
Truls Gjestland
SLSoogab Lee
Soogab Lee
Activities from 2008 to 2011 by ICBEN community response to noise team were summarized. That is, individual community-based indexes such as community tolerance Level, Zuricher Fluglarm Index (ZFI) and Frankfurter Fluglarm Index (FFI/FNI) were newly proposed, differences in railway bonus between Europe and Asia were discussed by a Swedish survey, socio-acoustic surveys were reported from developing countries, and annoyance equivalents and dominant source models were proposed as the adequate combined noise model. Furthermore, not only negative, but also positive aspects of sound were discussed as soundscape studies. Finally, seven items were listed as future team activities.

7 November 2018 in Preprints.org
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
Truls GjestlandTruls Gjestland
Truls Gjestland
The new WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region have recommendations for limiting noise exposure associated with adverse health effects. The limits are said to be based on a systematic review of existing evidence. This paper gives a systematic assessment of the presented evidence with respect to aircraft noise annoyance and demonstrates that the new guidelines are based on an arbitrary selection of existing studies comprising an imperfect and faulty set of data not representative for the general airport population.