Only limited data are available concerning the long-term outcomes of imatinib treatment among Vietnamese or Asian patients with unresectable or recurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Our study, which was conducted in 188 patients, aimed to assess the efficacy of imatinib mesylate against unresectable or recurrent GISTs. Imatinib had a high response rate and long survival. Some predictors favorable for progression-free survival and overall survival are good performance status and response with imatinib. Findings are discussed in relation to clinical practice in low- and middle-income country.

BRAF mutations are uncommon in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), accounting for less than 5% of all NSCLC cases. The utilization of targeted therapies in non‐V600E BRAF mutant NSCLC is considered controversial, although non‐V600E genotype is reported in ~50% of all BRAF mutant patients. We document the case of a 63‐year‐old patient with NSCLC harbouring a rare BRAF E501Q mutation, who had prolonged response to immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in Vietnam. The patient was diagnosed with metastatic PD‐L1‐negative lung adenocarcinoma and received pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy as first‐line treatment. After completing 35 cycles of pembrolizumab and pemetrexed, his disease has remained stable during the treatment‐free follow‐up period, and he is alive 38 months after treatment initiation at the latest follow‐up. Immune‐based therapy is an appropriate option for lung adenocarcinoma with rare non‐V600E BRAF mutation. Further clinical studies are necessary to determine the effectiveness of using immune‐based therapy in this specific population.

Background: The standard treatment for localized osteosarcoma is neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Our aim was to report the rate of histopathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of extremity osteosarcoma in Vietnam. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of stage II conventional osteosarcoma patients under 40 years-old who received MAP regimen as neoadjuvant chemotherapy at the Vietnam National Cancer Hospital between June 2019 and June 2022. Histopathological response was evaluated using the Huvos grading system, in which a good histopathological response was defined as a necrotic rate of 90% or more. Results: Thirty-five eligible patients were included in the study. Male patients accounted for 65.7%, with a median age of 16 years (range, 8-38 years). Of the 35 cases, 31 were reported as stage IIB (88.6%). The femur and tibia were the most common sites in our study, accounting for 51.4% and 34.3%, respectively. The most common pathologic subtype was osteoblastic osteosarcoma (68.6%), followed by chondroblastic subtype (20%). After two cycles of MAP-regimen neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 28 of 35 patients (80%) underwent limb-sparing surgery. A good histopathological response was observed in 18 of 35 patients (51.4%). There were significant correlations between the duration of symptoms ( P = 0.016), LDH ( P = 0.001) serum levels at initial presentation, and ALP ( P = 0.043) serum levels at initial presentation with histopathological response. Conclusion: This retrospective study suggests a possible association between symptom duration, pre-treatment LDH levels, and pre-treatment ALP levels with histopathological response rates. Additional clinical investigations with long-term follow-up are needed to investigate survival outcomes in the Asian population.

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effect of osimertinib and further to compare the results of osimertinib plus brain radiation vs. osimertinib monotherapy in advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases (BMs). Methods: A retrospective study was conducted involving 62 advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with BMs who were treated with first-line osimertinib at the Vietnam National Cancer Hospital between April 2019 and December 2023. Patients were categorised in two treatment groups: (1) osimertinib alone (33 patients) and (2) osimertinib combined with locoregional therapy, including stereotactic radiosurgery or whole-brain radiotherapy (29 patients). Endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), central nervous system response rate (CNS-ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS). Results: The systemic ORR was 91.9% and the disease-control rate (DCR) was 96.8%. The CNS-ORR was 91.9% and the CNS-DCR was 100%. The median PFS and median OS achieved were 24.5 and 35.2 months, respectively. There was no significant difference in outcomes between patients in either treatment group with respect to CNS-ORR ( P = 1.0), mean best percentage change from baseline in CNS target lesion size ( P = .376), median PFS ( P = .656), intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) ( P = .706), or OS ( P = .734). The occurrence of any-grade adverse events (AEs) did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups ( P = .762). However, in the osimertinib plus brain radiation cohort, 3/29 (10.3%) patients experienced radiotherapy-related AEs (2 cases of brain necrosis, 1 case of leukoencephalopathy), which consisted of one case of grade 3 brain radiation necrosis. Conclusion: Osimertinib shows favorable real-world outcomes in improving PFS, OS, and CNS-ORR in advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC Vietnamese patients with BMs, with no clear additional benefit from combining with brain radiotherapy.

Objective: To evaluate the outcome and safety of the paclitaxel, carboplatin, and capecitabine (TCX) regimen in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Methods: Advanced gastric cancer patients received the TCX regimen for up to six cycles, which were 3 weeks apart. Paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) was given over a 3-hour infusion, followed by carboplatin in a 1-hour infusion on day 1. Capecitabine (850 mg/m2) was given orally twice daily from day 1 to day 14. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Among 83 patients at stage IVa and IVb, the median PFS was 9.3 months; 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year PFS were 74.6%, 32.5%, and 14.4%, respectively. The median OS was 17.0 months; 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year OS were 97.5%, 68.7%, and 21.7%, respectively. In the multivariable Cox regression model, higher CEA was associated with poor OS. Common adverse events included hand-food syndrome (77.9%), peripheral neuropathy (63.2%), fatigue (68.7%), and nausea (54.2%). Conclusion: The TCX regimen provided good survival and a better safety profile. More clinical trials are needed to confirm its treatment efficacy and safety, especially in comparison with other triplet regimens.