Steven Abbott

Prof. Steven Abbott

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

52Years (1975-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2012 in Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FMFlorian Machui
Florian Machui
SLStefan Langner
Stefan Langner
XZXiangdong Zhu
Xiangdong Zhu
SASteven Abbott
Steven Abbott
CBChristoph J. Brabec
Christoph J. Brabec

29 June 2009 in Applied Physics Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
QCQ. Chen
Q. Chen
GHG. Hubbard
G. Hubbard
PSPhilip Shields
Philip Shields
CLC. Liu
C. Liu
DAD. W. E. Allsopp
D. W. E. Allsopp
SASteven Abbott
Steven Abbott
Subwavelength scale antireflection moth-eye structures in silicon were fabricated by a wafer-scale nanoimprint technique and demonstrated an average reflection of 1% in the spectral range from 400 to 1000 nm at normal incidence. An excellent antireflection property out to large incident angles is shown with the average reflection below 8% at 60°. Pyramid array gave an almost constant average reflection of about 10% for an incident angle up to 45° and concave-wall column array produced an approximately linear relation between the average reflection and the incident angles. The technique is promising for improving conversion efficiencies of silicon solar cells.

13 December 2012 in The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJonathan J. Booth
Jonathan J. Booth
SASteven Abbott
Steven Abbott
SSSeishi Shimizu
Seishi Shimizu

19 August 2011 in Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FMFlorian Machui
Florian Machui
SASteven Abbott
Steven Abbott
DWDavid Waller
David Waller
MKMarkus Koppe
Markus Koppe
CBChristoph J. Brabec
Christoph J. Brabec

27 February 2015 in Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JBJonathan J. Booth
Jonathan J. Booth
MOMuhiadin Omar
Muhiadin Omar
SASteven Abbott
Steven Abbott
SSSeishi Shimizu
Seishi Shimizu
A rigorous statistical thermodynamic theory explains how urea and nicotinamide can solubilize hydrophobic drugs in water.

4 November 2013 in Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SSSeishi Shimizu
Seishi Shimizu
JBJonathan J. Booth
Jonathan J. Booth
SASteven Abbott
Steven Abbott
Hydrophobic drugs can often be solubilized by the addition of hydrotropes. We have previously shown that preferential drug–hydrotrope association is one of the major factors of increased solubility (but not “hydrotrope clustering” or changes in “water structure”). How, then, can we understand this drug–hydrotrope interaction at a molecular level? Thermodynamic models based upon stoichiometric solute–water and solute–hydrotrope binding have long been used to understand solubilization microscopically. Such binding models have shown that the solvation numbers or coordination numbers of the water and hydrotrope molecules around the drug solute is the key quantity for solute–water and solute–hydrotrope interaction. However, we show that a rigorous statistical thermodynamic theory (the fluctuation solution theory originated by Kirkwood and Buff) requires the total reconsideration of such a paradigm. Here we show that (i) the excess solvation number (the net increase or decrease, relative to the bulk, of the solvent molecules around the solute), not the coordination number, is the key quantity for describing the solute–hydrotrope interaction; (ii) solute–hydrotrope binding is beyond the reach of the stoichiometric models because long-range solvation structure plays an important role.