Donna Goodridge

Dr. Donna Goodridge


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2015 in Chest
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GCGerard J. Criner
Gerard J. Criner
JBJean Bourbeau
Jean Bourbeau
RDRebecca L. Diekemper
Rebecca L. Diekemper
DODaniel R. Ouellette
Daniel R. Ouellette
DGDonna Goodridge
Donna Goodridge
MSMichael K. Stickland
Michael K. Stickland

23 February 2016 in BMC Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ALAdegboyega K. Lawal
Adegboyega K. Lawal
TRThomas Rotter
Thomas Rotter
LKLeigh Kinsman
Leigh Kinsman
AMAndreas Machotta
Andreas Machotta
Ulrich RonellenfitschUlrich Ronellenfitsch
Ulrich Ronellenfitsch
GGGary Groot
Gary Groot
Clinical pathways (CPWs) are a common component in the quest to improve the quality of health. CPWs are used to reduce variation, improve quality of care, and maximize the outcomes for specific groups of patients. An ongoing challenge is the operationalization of a definition of CPW in healthcare. This may be attributable to both the differences in definition and a lack of conceptualization in the field of clinical pathways. This correspondence article describes a process of refinement of an operational definition for CPW research and proposes an operational definition for the future syntheses of CPWs literature. Following the approach proposed by Kinsman et al. (BMC Medicine 8(1):31, 2010) and Wieland et al. (Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine 17(2):50, 2011), we used a four-stage process to generate a five criteria checklist for the definition of CPWs. We refined the operational definition, through consensus, merging two of the checklist’s criteria, leading to a more inclusive criterion for accommodating CPW studies conducted in various healthcare settings. The following four criteria for CPW operational definition, derived from the refinement process described above, are (1) the intervention was a structured multidisciplinary plan of care; (2) the intervention was used to translate guidelines or evidence into local structures; (3) the intervention detailed the steps in a course of treatment or care in a plan, pathway, algorithm, guideline, protocol or other ‘inventory of actions’ (i.e. the intervention had time-frames or criteria-based progression); and (4) the intervention aimed to standardize care for a specific population. An intervention meeting all four criteria was considered to be a CPW. The development of operational definitions for complex interventions is a useful approach to appraise and synthesize evidence for policy development and quality improvement.

1 January 2011 in Canadian Respiratory Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DMDarcy D Marciniuk
Darcy D Marciniuk
DGDonna Goodridge
Donna Goodridge
PHPaul Hernandez
Paul Hernandez
GRGraeme Rocker
Graeme Rocker
MBMeyer Balter
Meyer Balter
CGCanadian Thoracic Society COPD Committee Dyspnea Expert Working Group,
Canadian Thoracic Society COPD Committee Dyspnea Expert Working Group,
Dyspnea is a cardinal symptom of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and its severity and magnitude increases as the disease progresses, leading to significant disability and a negative effect on quality of life. Refractory dyspnea is a common and difficult symptom to treat in patients with advanced COPD. There are many questions concerning optimal management and, specifically, whether various therapies are effective in this setting. The present document was compiled to address these important clinical issues using an evidence-based systematic review process led by a representative interprofessional panel of experts.The evidence supports the benefits of oral opioids, neuromuscular electrical stimulation, chest wall vibration, walking aids and pursed-lip breathing in the management of dyspnea in the individual patient with advanced COPD. Oxygen is recommended for COPD patients with resting hypoxemia, but its use for the targeted management of dyspnea in this setting should be reserved for patients who receive symptomatic benefit. There is insufficient evidence to support the routine use of anxiolytic medications, nebulized opioids, acupuncture, acupressure, distractive auditory stimuli (music), relaxation, hand-held fans, counselling programs or psychotherapy. There is also no evidence to support the use of supplemental oxygen to reduce dyspnea in nonhypoxemic patients with advanced COPD.Recognizing the current unfamiliarity with prescribing and dosing of opioid therapy in this setting, a potential approach for their use is illustrated. The role of opioid and other effective therapies in the comprehensive management of refractory dyspnea in patients with advanced COPD is discussed.

21 February 2016 in Chronic Respiratory Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DGDonna Goodridge
Donna Goodridge
DMDarcy Marciniuk
Darcy Marciniuk
The challenges of providing quality respiratory care to persons living in rural or remote communities can be daunting. These populations are often vulnerable in terms of both health status and access to care, highlighting the need for innovation in service delivery. The rapidly expanding options available using telehealthcare technologies have the capacity to allow patients in rural and remote communities to connect with providers at distant sites and to facilitate the provision of diagnostic, monitoring, and therapeutic services. Successful implementation of telehealthcare programs in rural and remote settings is, however, contingent upon accounting for key technical, organizational, social, and legal considerations at the individual, community, and system levels. This review article discusses five types of telehealthcare delivery that can facilitate respiratory care for residents of rural or remote communities: remote monitoring (including wearable and ambient systems; remote consultations (between providers and between patients and providers), remote pulmonary rehabilitation, telepharmacy, and remote sleep monitoring. Current and future challenges related to telehealthcare are discussed.

1 April 2006 in Foot & Ankle International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DGDonna Goodridge
Donna Goodridge
ETElly Trepman
Elly Trepman
JSJeff Sloan
Jeff Sloan
LGLorna Guse
Lorna Guse
LSLaurel A. Strain
Laurel A. Strain
JEJohn M. Embil
John M. Embil
Background: Diabetic foot ulcers cause major treatment morbidity and cost of care. This study evaluated quality of life in patients with unhealed and healed diabetic foot ulcers. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of adult diabetic patients (age 45 years or older) treated in a tertiary care foot clinic who had foot ulcers within the preceding 2 years. Patients with other diabetic complications or conditions that would potentially affect quality of life were excluded. Two patient groups of comparable age, gender distribution, and duration of diabetes were studied: 57 patients with unhealed ulcers (minimum duration, 6 months) and 47 patients with healed ulcers. Telephone interviews were done using the Short Form 12 (SF-12) (both groups) and a Cardiff Wound Impact Scale (CWIS) (unhealed ulcer group). Results: The mean SF-12 Physical Component Summary score was significantly lower for the group with unhealed ulcers (unhealed, 35 ± 8 points; healed, 39 ± 10 points; p = 0.04); these scores for both groups were significantly lower than published Short Form 36 (SF-36) scores for general, diabetic, and hypertensive populations. The mean SF-12 Mental Component Summary scores of the groups did not differ significantly from each other or from published population scores. CWIS responses showed that patients with unhealed ulcers were frustrated with healing and had anxiety about the wounds, resulting in marked negative impact on the average Well-being Component Score (35 ± 6 points). Conclusions: Individuals with diabetic foot ulcers experience profound compromise of physical quality of life, which is worse in those with unhealed ulcers.

1 June 2008 in Respiratory Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DGDonna Goodridge
Donna Goodridge
JLJosh Lawson
Josh Lawson
WDWendy Duggleby
Wendy Duggleby
DMDarcy Marciniuk
Darcy Marciniuk
DRDonna Rennie
Donna Rennie
MSMaryRose Stang
MaryRose Stang