Wendy Cooper

Dr. Wendy Cooper

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2015 in Lung Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WCWendy Cooper
Wendy Cooper
TTThang Tran
Thang Tran
RVRicardo E. Vilain
Ricardo E. Vilain
JMJason Madore
Jason Madore
CSChristina I. Selinger
Christina I. Selinger
Richard A ScolyerRichard A Scolyer
Richard A Scolyer

1 October 2013
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WCWendy Cooper
Wendy Cooper
DLDavid C. L. Lam
David C. L. Lam
SOSandra A. O’toole
Sandra A. O’toole
JMJohn D. Minna
John D. Minna
Molecular biology of lung cancer

7 August 2025 in European Respiratory Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CRChristopher J. Ryerson
Christopher J. Ryerson
AAAyodeji Adegunsoye
Ayodeji Adegunsoye
SPSara Piciucchi
Sara Piciucchi
LHLida P. Hariri
Lida P. Hariri
YKYet H. Khor
Yet H. Khor
ANAndrew G Nicholson
Andrew G Nicholson
Background: The 2013 American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement on the classification of the idiopathic interstitial pneumonias described 6 major and 2 rare subtypes of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia, as well as recognising unclassifiable disease. Objective: The objective of this statement is to update the 2013 classification of interstitial pneumonia. Methods: Five co-chairs identified a committee of 32 experts in the field as well as two individuals with lived experience. Creation of the document was supported by a series of video meetings, first including the full committee and then subgroups assigned to draft specific sections of the document. The classification scheme was developed by consensus. Results: The multidisciplinary committee of experts identified four major advances to the classification of interstitial pneumonia: (1) expansion beyond idiopathic interstitial pneumonias to also include secondary causes; (2) identification of new subcategories and updated terms, including addition of bronchiolocentric interstitial pneumonia as a major pattern as well as changing from acute interstitial pneumonia to idiopathic diffuse alveolar damage and desquamative interstitial pneumonia to alveolar macrophage pneumonia; (3) subclassification of interstitial and alveolar filling disorders, with interstitial disorders further subclassified as fibrotic versus non-fibrotic; and (4) consideration of diagnostic confidence in patient evaluation and management. The committee also provided a comprehensive update on the status of potential molecular tools and identified future research priorities. Conclusions: This update builds upon the previous classification approach by describing major advances in the classification of interstitial pneumonia over the last decade.

14 August 2017 in Clinical Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WCWendy Cooper
Wendy Cooper
PRPrudence A. Russell
Prudence A. Russell
MCMaya Cherian
Maya Cherian
EDEdwina E. Duhig
Edwina E. Duhig
DGDavid Godbolt
David Godbolt
SFStephen Fox
Stephen Fox
Purpose: Reliable and reproducible methods for identifying PD-L1 expression on tumor cells are necessary to identify responders to anti–PD-1 therapy. We tested the reproducibility of the assessment of PD-L1 expression in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tissue samples by pathologists. Experimental Design: NSCLC samples were stained with PD-L1 22C3 pharmDx kit using the Dako Autostainer Link 48 Platform. Two sample sets of 60 samples each were designed to assess inter- and intraobserver reproducibility considering two cut points for positivity: 1% or 50% of PD-L1 stained tumor cells. A randomization process was used to obtain equal distribution of PD-L1 positive and negative samples within each sample set. Ten pathologists were randomly assigned to two subgroups. Subgroup 1 analyzed all samples on two consecutive days. Subgroup 2 performed the same assessments, except they received a 1-hour training session prior to the second assessment. Results: For intraobserver reproducibility, the overall percent agreement (OPA) was 89.7% [95% confidence interval (CI), 85.7–92.6] for the 1% cut point and 91.3% (95% CI, 87.6–94.0) for the 50% cut point. For interobserver reproducibility, OPA was 84.2% (95% CI, 82.8–85.5) for the 1% cut point and 81.9% (95% CI, 80.4–83.3) for the 50% cut point, and Cohen's κ coefficients were 0.68 (95% CI, 0.65–0.71) and 0.58 (95% CI, 0.55–0.62), respectively. The training was found to have no or very little impact on intra- or interobserver reproducibility. Conclusions: Pathologists reported good reproducibility at both 1% and 50% cut points. More adapted training could potentially increase reliability, in particular for samples with PD-L1 proportion, scores around 50%. Clin Cancer Res; 23(16); 4569–77. ©2017 AACR.

1 December 2013 in Laboratory Investigation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CSChristina I Selinger
Christina I Selinger
TRToni-Maree Rogers
Toni-Maree Rogers
PRPrudence A Russell
Prudence A Russell
SOSandra O'Toole
Sandra O'Toole
PYPoYee Yip
PoYee Yip
BSBenjamin Solomon
Benjamin Solomon
Rearrangements of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) define a molecular subgroup of tumors characterized clinically by sensitivity to ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as crizotinib. Although ALK rearrangements may be detected by reverse transcriptase-PCR, immunohistochemistry or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), the optimal clinical strategy for identifying ALK rearrangements in clinical samples remains to be determined. We evaluated immunohistochemistry using three different antibodies (ALK1, 5A4 and D5F3 clones) to detect ALK rearrangements and compared those with FISH. We report the frequency and clinicopathologic features of lung cancers harboring ALK translocations in 594 resected NSCLCs (470 adenocarcinomas; 83 squamous carcinomas, 26 large cell carcinomas and 15 other histological subtypes) using a tissue microarray approach. We identified an ALK gene rearrangement in 7/594 cases (1%) by FISH and all anti-ALK antibodies correctly identified the seven ALK-positive cases (100% sensitivity), although the intensity of staining was weak in some cases. These data indicate that the use of antibodies with high sensitivity and avidity to ALK may provide an effective pre-screening technique to complement the more expensive and labor-intensive approach of ALK FISH testing.

29 January 2019 in Journal of Clinical Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ACAndrew J Colebatch
Andrew J Colebatch
ADAlexander Dobrovic
Alexander Dobrovic
WCWendy Cooper
Wendy Cooper
In this review, we summarise the function and structure of telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) in humans, including its regulation. The dysregulation of telomerase through TERT promoter mutations across a range of cancers is discussed. The molecular mechanism activated by TERT promoter mutations is outlined. Finally, the timing of TERT promoter mutations during carcinogenesis is reviewed in the context of their potential utility as clinical biomarkers of malignant transformation.