Cintia  X. de Mello

Dr. Cintia X. de Mello

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 January 2021 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CSCaio Thomaz de Lima e Silva
Caio Thomaz de Lima e Silva
CMCintia X. de Mello
Cintia X. de Mello
OEOtávio de Melo Espíndola
Otávio de Melo Espíndola
ASArmando de Oliveira Shubach
Armando de Oliveira Shubach
LQLeonardo Pereira Quintella
Leonardo Pereira Quintella
MMMauro Celio de Almeida Marzochi
Mauro Celio de Almeida Marzochi
Background: Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is an infectious vector-borne disease caused by protozoa of the Leishmania genus that affects humans and animals. The distribution of parasites in the lesion is not uniform, and there are divergences in the literature about the choice of the better sampling site for diagnosis–inner or outer edge of the ulcerated skin lesion. In this context, determining the region of the lesion with the highest parasite density and, consequently, the appropriate site for collecting samples can define the success of the laboratory diagnosis. Hence, this study aims to comparatively evaluate the parasite load by qPCR, quantification of amastigotes forms in the direct exam, and the histopathological profile on the inner and outer edges of ulcerated CL lesions. Methods: Samples from ulcerated skin lesions from 39 patients with confirmed CL were examined. We performed scraping of the ulcer inner edge (base) and outer edge (raised border) and lesion biopsy for imprint and histopathological examination. Slides smears were stained by Giemsa and observed in optical microscopy, the material contained on the smears was used to determine parasite load by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) with primers directed to the Leishmania (Viannia) minicircle kinetoplast DNA. The histopathological exam was performed to evaluate cell profile, tissue alterations and semi-quantitative assessment of amastigote forms in inner and outer edges. Principal findings: Parasite loads were higher on the inner edge compared to the outer edge of the lesions, either by qPCR technique (P<0.001) and histopathological examination (P< 0.003). There was no significant difference in the parasite load between the imprint and scraping on the outer edge (P = 1.0000). Conclusion/Significance: The results suggest that clinical specimens from the inner edge of the ulcerated CL lesions are the most suitable for both molecular diagnosis and direct parasitological examination.

1 December 2014 in Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CMCintia X. de Mello
Cintia X. de Mello
FFFabiano Borges Figueiredo
Fabiano Borges Figueiredo
AJArtur Augusto Velho Mendes Júnior
Artur Augusto Velho Mendes Júnior
MFMarina Carvalho Furtado
Marina Carvalho Furtado
LMLuciana Freitas Campos De Miranda
Luciana Freitas Campos De Miranda
MMMaria De Fátima Madeira
Maria De Fátima Madeira
Key words: Barra Mansa; Canine survey; Canine visceral leishmaniasis

18 May 2011 in Parasitology Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CMCintia X. de Mello
Cintia X. de Mello
ASArmando de Oliveira Schubach
Armando de Oliveira Schubach
RORaquel Vasconcellos Carvalho de Oliveira
Raquel Vasconcellos Carvalho de Oliveira
Fatima Conceição-SilvaFatima Conceição-Silva
Fatima Conceição-Silva
Maria Inês Fernandes PimentelMaria Inês Fernandes Pimentel
Maria Inês Fernandes Pimentel
MMMaria de Fátima Madeira
Maria de Fátima Madeira

1 February 2011 in Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CMCintia X. de Mello
Cintia X. de Mello
ASArmando de Oliveira Schubach
Armando de Oliveira Schubach
MMMaria de Fátima Madeira
Maria de Fátima Madeira

1 June 2014 in Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LSLuiz Henrique Conde Sangenis
Luiz Henrique Conde Sangenis
SLSebastião Roberto De Almeida Lima
Sebastião Roberto De Almeida Lima
CMCintia X. de Mello
Cintia X. de Mello
DCDaniela Trindade Cardoso
Daniela Trindade Cardoso
JMJurema Nunes Mello
Jurema Nunes Mello
WTWalter Tavares
Walter Tavares
Visceral Leishmaniasis has been showing remarkable epidemiological changes in recent decades, with marked expansion and an emergence of cases in urban areas of the North, Southeast and Midwest regions of Brazil. The Kala-azar cases reported here, despite being very characteristic, presented a great difficulty of diagnosis, because the disease is not endemic in Volta Redonda. The child underwent two hospitalizations in different hospitals, but got the correct diagnosis only after 11 months of symptom onset. In this report we discuss the main differential diagnoses and call attention to the suspected symptoms of visceral leishmaniasis in patients with prolonged fever, hepatosplenomegaly and pancytopenia, even in areas not traditionally endemic for the disease.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ISIsabela C. S. Santos
Isabela C. S. Santos
Daniel Moreira De AvelarDaniel Moreira De Avelar
Daniel Moreira De Avelar
LMLuciana de Freitas Campos Miranda
Luciana de Freitas Campos Miranda
CMCintia X. de Mello
Cintia X. de Mello
LKLucas Keidel
Lucas Keidel
Andreza Pain MarcelinoAndreza Pain Marcelino
Andreza Pain Marcelino
The diagnosis of canine visceral leishmaniasis (CVL) presents a challenge due to a variety of non-specific clinical signs. The available tests have low sensitivity. This study aimed to standardize and evaluate the loop-mediated isothermal amplification technique with K26 target (K26-LAMP) for diagnosis of CVL in conjunctival swab (CS) DNA samples extracted through a silica column commercial kit (SW-kit) and boiling (SW-DB) and to compare sensitivity with conventional PCR (kDNA-cPCR) and quantitative real-time PCR (18S-qPCR). Clinical samples of CSs were collected from 54 dogs after reactive serology tests. Positive parasitological and/or histological tests were used as inclusion criteria for a sensitivity analysis. A total of 79.2% (43/54) of dogs without clinical signs or with mild, moderate, or severe clinical signs were included in the study. The sensitivity results of K26-LAMP, kDNA-cPCR, and 18S-qPCR were 72.1%, 81.4%, and 80.5% with the SW-kit and 97.2%, 95.2%, and 57.1% with SW-DB, respectively. In all techniques, the proportion of positives was higher in the group with severe clinical disease, with statistically significant differences in the K26-LAMP and 18S-qPCR techniques being seen with the SW-kit. The results obtained with LAMP for CS samples are promising and its performance is similar to other techniques.