Orkhan Mammadkhanlı

Dr. Orkhan Mammadkhanlı


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 January 2020 in Neurosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
OMOrkhan Mammadkhanlı
Orkhan Mammadkhanlı
CECagri Elbir
Cagri Elbir
SHSahin Hanalioglu
Sahin Hanalioglu
SCSuat Canbay
Suat Canbay
To investigate the treatment of iatrogenic cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak that develops after degenerative lumbar spinal surgery with a subfascial drainage and clipping (SDC) technique. This study retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 46 patients who developed iatrogenic CSF leak after surgery for lumbar degenerative spine disease from 2007 to 2019. Twenty-five patients were treated with the SDC procedure (SDC group), whereas 21 were not (control group). Outcomes were compared between the two groups. CSF leakage ceased within 6-9 days (average 7.4+/-1) after the procedure in the SDC group. In the control group, CSF leakage was controlled with conservative measures in 14 patients, and in 7 patients, lumbar external drainage was performed. Among these 7, the CSF leak was controlled by lumbar external drainage in 3, and 4 required reoperation to repair the dural defect. No infection occurred in either group. Length of hospital stay was also shorter in SDC group (8.4+/-1 vs 10.0+/-1.3 days, p less than 0.001). The SDC technique is effective for the treatment of iatrogenic CSF leak that develops after degenerative lumbar spinal surgery.

4 April 2024 in Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OMOrkhan Mammadkhanlı
Orkhan Mammadkhanlı
SKSezgin Kehaya
Sezgin Kehaya
SSSerdar Solak
Serdar Solak
KYKaan Yağmurlu
Kaan Yağmurlu

1 December 2020 in Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SHSahin Hanalioglu
Sahin Hanalioglu
GBGokhan Bozkurt
Gokhan Bozkurt
IIIlkay Isikay
Ilkay Isikay
OMOrkhan Mammadkhanlı
Orkhan Mammadkhanlı

16 November 2021 in The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NINurlan İsAyev
Nurlan İsAyev
LYLevent Yücel
Levent Yücel
HAHatice Seçil Akyıldız
Hatice Seçil Akyıldız
OMOrkhan Mammadkhanlı
Orkhan Mammadkhanlı
HBHazan Başak
Hazan Başak
İDİhsan Doğan
İhsan Doğan
Background: Retropharyngeal abscess (RPA) is a life-threatening, dangerous condition and uncommon in adults. The coexistence of RPA, cervical spinal epidural abscess (CSEA), and spondylodiscitis is extremely rare. Case presentation: We present a case with a retropharyngeal and epidural abscess caused by spondylodiscitis. A 61-year-old man was referred to our clinic with the complaints of sore throat, limitation in neck range of motion, numbness, and weakness in the left arm and the left ear for one month. The airway was not obstructed. Neurological deficits were detected in his left arm. Cervical computed tomography revealed a 50 × 30 × 15 mm retropharyngeal abscess. Cervical magnetic resonance imaging showed abscess, C5–6 spondylodiscitis and epidural abscess, and myelopathic signal changes in the C3–7 spinal cord. The abscess was drained, and C5–6 discectomy was performed. The patient was discharged with cervical collar and antibiotics. Conclusions: Multidisciplinary approach that consists of otolaryngologist, neurosurgeon, and infectious disease specialist is needed to avoid complications and any delay.

1 August 2018 in Journal of Ankara University Faculty of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OÖOnur Özgüral
Onur Özgüral
OMOrkhan Mammadkhanlı
Orkhan Mammadkhanlı
İDİhsan Doğan
İhsan Doğan
ÜEümit Eroğlu
ümit Eroğlu
AOAylin Heper Okçu
Aylin Heper Okçu
AÜAğahan Ünlü
Ağahan Ünlü

1 January 2020 in Turkish Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OMOrkhan Mammadkhanlı
Orkhan Mammadkhanlı
MBMelih Bozkurt
Melih Bozkurt
YCYusuf Sukru Caglar
Yusuf Sukru Caglar
AIM: To assess the classical and functional imaging features of patients with pathology located in the eloquent areas of the brain who were admitted to our centre between October 2012 and February 2018. We also studied intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential (SEP), motor evoked potentials (MEP), phase reversal, cortical mapping, the extent of resection and the calculation of postoperative morbidity. MATERIAL and METHODS: We compared our results with previous studies in which this technique was not used. The patient records of 163 patients were reviewed retrospectively after approval by the institutional ethics committee and comparisons were made with reports in the literature. RESULTS: The lesion was localised in the visual cortex in eight of the 163 patients. We did not encounter any abnormality in the VEP recordings, so the surgeries were continued. The remaining 155 cases were followed by intraoperative SEP and MEP monitoring. We observed a greater than 50% decrease in the amplitude and an increase in latencies that was greater than 10% in intraoperative MEP and SEP monitoring in 24 patients of 155. Although 8 of 24 patients with abnormal SEP and MEP values were corrected with manuveurs, 6 patients developed increased neurological deficits postoperatively. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, all of these methods should not be seen as competitive with each other; they could be considered as complementary. All of these methods are helpful for a surgical team regarding loss of neurological function. The rate of loss might be up to 100% and irreversible despite corrective maneveurs.