A frequent topic of biomedical research is the potential clinical use of non-coding (nc) RNAs as quantitative biomarkers for a broad spectrum of health and disease. However, ncRNA analyses have not been pressed into widespread diagnostic use. Strong preclinical evidence suggests obstacles in the translation and reproducibility of this type of biomarker which may result from preanalytical and analytical variation in the non-standardized processes used to collect, process, and store samples, as well as the substantive differences between small and long ncRNA. We performed a narrative review of selected literature, through the lens of key laboratory-developed test (LDT) regulations under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) in the United States, to study critical gaps in ncRNA validation studies. This review describes the leading candidate ncRNA subclasses, their biogenesis and cellular function, and identifies specific pre-analytical variables with disproportionate impact on testing performance. We summarize these findings with strategic recommendations to clinicians and biomedical scientists involved in the design, conduct, and translation of ncRNA biomarker development.

Repurposing biological samples collected for required diagnostic purposes into suitable biobanking projects is a particularly useful method for enabling research in vulnerable populations. This approach is especially appropriate for the neonate in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), where blood volume reductions can quickly increase beyond minimal risk for adverse events, such as iatrogenic anemia, and proxy consent provided by parents or guardians is required. The method described in this study provides a framework to prospectively collect and store blood-derived clinical samples after all clinical and regulatory requirements are fulfilled. The consent approach incorporated a 30-day window to allow parents and guardians ample consideration time with follow-up involvement with NICU embedded study team members. The study enrolled 875 participants over a 3-year period. This established a critically needed biobank to support investigator-initiated research with explicit study aims requiring samples at defined day of life frequencies within the NICU and created a normative control reference bank for case comparisons for premature and full-term neonates with brain injury.