Vera Buss

Ms. Vera Buss

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 August 2018 in Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VBVera Buss
Vera Buss
ASAlison Shield
Alison Shield
Sam KosariSam Kosari
Sam Kosari
MNMark Naunton
Mark Naunton
In Australia, community pharmacists are increasingly being integrated into the healthcare system. A range of services in pharmacies are government-funded aiming to prevent chronic diseases and improve the quality use of medicines. The objective of this narrative review is to evaluate the impact of existing pharmacy services and identify opportunities to better address the patients’ needs. A narrative review was undertaken. First, Community Pharmacy Agreement documents between the Australian government and the Pharmacy Guild of Australia were reviewed to identify relevant community pharmacy services. Based on these, a literature search was conducted via PubMed and Google Scholar. The included articles were analysed and a proposal for further improvement of the programmes was developed. Overall, five areas of community pharmacy interventions were identified: clinical interventions, medication reviews, health promotion, screening and management of chronic diseases, and support services for drug addiction. Pharmacists’ interventions have led to improved asthma control, detection of diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors, reduction in smoking rates and weight, and identification of drug-related problems. The availability of vaccination services in pharmacies has contributed to increased vaccination rates. Through support programmes for drug abusers the transmission rate of blood-borne diseases was decreased. Factors that facilitate community pharmacy interventions are skilled staff, remuneration, a designated area in the pharmacy, and good relationships between health professionals. The main barriers are patients’ unawareness of existing programmes, pharmacists’ lack of confidence and time, and physicians’ lack of involvement. To achieve integrated care for patients, the individual services should be better combined, starting with low intensity interventions and proceeding to in-depth services if required. Community pharmacies are well located to deliver healthcare services due to convenience and accessibility. The range of services offered by community pharmacies is comprehensive. Despite this, the clinical interventions provided in pharmacies currently appear not to be coordinated. This leads to the proposal that more efforts should be put into linking the individual services. There is sufficient evidence for the effectiveness of most of the pharmacy services reviewed. However, the potential of the individual services might be further enhanced by interlinking the services and better integrating them with the patient care provided by GPs and other health professionals.

1 May 2019 in Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VBVera Buss
Vera Buss
LDLOUISE DEEKS
LOUISE DEEKS
ASAlison Shield
Alison Shield
Sam KosariSam Kosari
Sam Kosari
Mark NauntonMark Naunton
Mark Naunton

10 May 2022 in JMIR Human Factors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
VBVera Buss
Vera Buss
MVMarlien Varnfield
Marlien Varnfield
MHMark Harris
Mark Harris
MBMargo Linn Barr
Margo Linn Barr
Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are posing a huge burden on health care systems worldwide. Mobile apps can deliver behavior change interventions for chronic disease prevention on a large scale, but current evidence for their effectiveness is limited. Objective: This paper reported on the development and user testing of a mobile app that aims at increasing risk awareness and engaging users in behavior change. It would form part of an intervention for primary prevention of CVD and T2DM. Methods: The theoretical framework of the app design was based on the Behaviour Change Wheel, combined with the capability, opportunity, and motivation for behavior change system and the behavior change techniques from the Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (version 1). In addition, evidence from scientific literature has guided the development process. The prototype was tested for user-friendliness via an iterative approach. We conducted semistructured interviews with individuals in the target populations, which included the System Usability Scale. We transcribed and analyzed the interviews using descriptive statistics for the System Usability Scale and thematic analysis to identify app features that improved utility and usability. Results: The target population was Australians aged ≥45 years. The app included 4 core modules (risk score, goal setting, health measures, and education). In these modules, users learned about their risk for CVD and T2DM; set goals for smoking, alcohol consumption, diet, and physical activity; and tracked them. In total, we included 12 behavior change techniques. We conducted 2 rounds of usability testing, each involving 5 participants. The average age of the participants was 58 (SD 8) years. Totally, 60% (6/10) of the participants owned iPhone Operating System phones, and 40% (4/10) of them owned Android phones. In the first round, we identified a technical issue that prevented 30% (3/10) of the participants from completing the registration process. Among the 70% (7/10) of participants who were able to complete the registration process, 71% (5/7) rated the app above average, based on the System Usability Scale. During the interviews, we identified some issues related to functionality, content, and language and clarity. We used the participants’ feedback to improve these aspects. Conclusions: We developed the app using behavior change theory and scientific evidence. The user testing allowed us to identify and remove technical errors and integrate additional functions into the app, which the participants had requested. Next, we will evaluate the feasibility of the revised version of the app developed through this design process and usability testing.

29 October 2020 in Journal of Medical Internet Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
VBVera Buss
Vera Buss
SLStuart Leesong
Stuart Leesong
MBMargo Linn Barr
Margo Linn Barr
MVMarlien Varnfield
Marlien Varnfield
MHMark Harris
Mark Harris
Background: Digital technology is an opportunity for public health interventions to reach a large part of the population. Objective: This systematic literature review aimed to assess the effectiveness of mobile health–based interventions in reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods: We conducted the systematic search in 7 electronic databases using a predefined search strategy. We included articles published between inception of the databases and March 2019 if they reported on the effectiveness of an intervention for prevention of cardiovascular disease or type 2 diabetes via mobile technology. One researcher performed the search, study selection, data extraction, and methodological quality assessment. The steps were validated by the other members of the research team Results: The search yielded 941 articles for cardiovascular disease, of which 3 met the inclusion criteria, and 732 for type 2 diabetes, of which 6 met the inclusion criteria. The methodological quality of the studies was low, with the main issue being nonblinding of participants. Of the selected studies, 4 used SMS text messaging, 1 used WhatsApp, and the remaining ones used specific smartphone apps. Weight loss and reduction in BMI were the most reported successful outcomes (reported in 4 studies). Conclusions: Evidence on the effectiveness of mobile health-based interventions in reducing the risk for cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes is low due to the quality of the studies and the small effects that were measured. This highlights the need for further high-quality research to investigate the potential of mobile health interventions. Trial Registration: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) CRD42019135405; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=135405

2 May 2024 in Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Sarah JacksonSarah Jackson
Sarah Jackson
HTHarry Tattan-Birch
Harry Tattan-Birch
VBVera Buss
Vera Buss
Lion ShahabLion Shahab
Lion Shahab
JBJamie Brown
Jamie Brown
Introduction: This study aimed to estimate time trends in cigarette consumption among smokers in England between 2008 and 2023 and to explore differences by key potential moderators. Aims and Methods: We used data from 57 778 adult cigarette smokers participating in a nationally representative monthly cross-sectional survey between January 2008 and September 2023. We estimated monthly time trends in mean daily consumption of (1) any, (2) manufactured, and (3) hand-rolled cigarettes among all smokers and by main type of cigarettes smoked, smoking frequency, age, gender, occupational social grade, region, nicotine replacement therapy use, and vaping status. Results: Overall cigarette consumption fell from 13.6 [95% CI = 13.3 to 13.9] to 10.6 [10.5 to 10.8] per day between January 2008 and October 2019 (a 22% decrease), then remained stable up to September 2023. Over this period, the proportion mainly or exclusively smoking hand-rolled cigarettes increased (from 30.6% [29.1%–32.1%] in 2008 to 52.1% [49.7%–54.5%] in 2023). As a result, manufactured cigarette consumption fell by 47%, from 9.5 [9.2–9.8] per day in January 2008 to 5.0 [4.7–5.3] in September 2023, while hand-rolled cigarette consumption increased by 35%, from 4.2 [3.9–4.4] to 5.6 [5.3–5.9], respectively. The decline in overall cigarette consumption was observed across all subgroups, but was greater among non-daily smokers, younger smokers, and those who vaped. Conclusions: Over the last 15 years, the average number of cigarettes consumed each day by smokers in England has fallen by almost a quarter, but has plateaued since October 2019. There has been a sharp decline in the number of manufactured cigarettes consumed and an increase in the number of hand-rolled cigarettes consumed, as smokers have increasingly shifted towards using hand-rolled tobacco. Implications: While average cigarette consumption in England has fallen over the past 15 years, this declining trend has stalled (and reversed in some population groups) since 2019. The availability of cheap, hand-rolled tobacco appears to be undermining policies that aim to reduce smoking by raising the price of tobacco (eg, through taxation) and could be targeted to reignite the decline in cigarette consumption.

15 April 2025 in Addiction
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Sarah JacksonSarah Jackson
Sarah Jackson
Lion ShahabLion Shahab
Lion Shahab
HTHarry Tattan‐Birch
Harry Tattan‐Birch
VBVera Buss
Vera Buss
JBJamie Brown
Jamie Brown
Background/Aim: There has been a rapid rise in vaping prevalence among youth and young adults in Great Britain since disposable vapes started to become popular in 2021. In January 2024, the government announced plans to introduce new vaping policies, including a ban on disposable vapes, to tackle youth vaping. This study measured whether trends in current vaping and use of disposable vapes have changed since this announcement.Methods: Segmented regression analysis of data collected monthly between January 2022 and January 2025 as part of the Smoking Toolkit Study, a representative household survey in Great Britain. We ran generalised additive models using data from all participants aged ≥16y (n = 88 611; ‘adults’) and from a subset aged 16‐24y (n = 9276; ‘young adults’). Main outcome measures were changes in trends in (a) the prevalence of current vaping and (b) the proportion of vapers mainly using disposable devices.Results: Before January 2024, vaping prevalence was increasing by 23.4% per year [relative risk (RR)trend = 1.234, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.184–1.287] and use of disposable vapes was increasing by 17.7% per year (RRtrend = 1.177, 95% CI = 1.105–1.255). These trends changed after the new policy measures were announced (RRΔtrend = 0.782, 95% CI = 0.696–0.878, and RRΔtrend = 0.573, 95% CI = 0.487–0.673, respectively). Instead of increasing, vaping prevalence stabilised and there was a substantial decline in the proportion of vapers mainly using disposables from 43.6% (40.1–47.3%) in January 2024 to 29.4% (26.3–32.9%) in January 2025. Similar changes were observed among young adults (vaping prevalence: RRΔtrend = 0.799, 95% CI = 0.645–0.990; use of disposable vapes: RRΔtrend = 0.547, 95% CI = 0.435–0.688), with vaping prevalence stabilising between January 2024 and January 2025 and the proportion of vapers mainly using disposables falling from 63.2% (58.8–67.8%) to 35.2% (30.4–40.8%).Conclusions: Following the announcement of an impending ban on disposable vapes and other potential vaping policies, recent increases in vaping prevalence in Great Britain stalled, including among young adults. In addition, there was a shift away from using disposable vapes, with people increasingly opting to use devices that can be refilled and recharged.