Petar Mladenov

Mr. Petar Mladenov

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 September 2026 in Journal of Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PMPetar Mladenov
Petar Mladenov
FKFrauke Kellner-Weldon
Frauke Kellner-Weldon
CIChristoph Johann Illi
Christoph Johann Illi
MBMirko Birbaumer
Mirko Birbaumer
The central vein sign (CVS) is a supportive imaging biomarker for multiple sclerosis (MS), but its manual assessment on susceptibility-weighted imaging with phase enhancement (SWIp) is time-consuming and reader-dependent. Existing automated methods rely on multi-contrast volumetric data and prerequisite lesion masks. We study a deliberately different formulation: a structured end-to-end pipeline operating on a single axial SWIp sequence with sparse slice-wise annotations and no prerequisite volumetric mask, combining anatomical tiling, tiled lesion detection, cross-slice reconstruction of lesion identity, and two complementary branches that independently assess the same lesion crops—direct CVS classification (Pathway A) and vein-presence gating, vein segmentation, and geometric centrality (Pathway B). A cohort of 64 clinical studies annotated by four readers was merged into a consolidated reference. The main contribution is an explicit decomposition of where such a pipeline fails. On an eight-study evaluation, the pipeline recovered 78 of 111 reference lesions (70.3%); lesion-level F1 was 0.667 for Pathway A and 0.706 for Pathway B, rising to 0.785 and 0.818 when restricted to detected lesions, and a paired test found no significant difference between the pathways (p=1.00). Detection is therefore the binding constraint, and a threshold sweep shows the associated overcounting of CVS-positive lesions is not separable from it by detector confidence alone. All operating thresholds were selected on these same eight studies, which were acquired on a single scanner, so the figures are single-centre development-set estimates rather than measures of clinical performance and are likely optimistic. Larger-cohort, acquisition-diverse independent evaluation is required before clinical use.

26 October 2025
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
PMPetar Mladenov
Petar Mladenov
JHJasmin Heierli
Jasmin Heierli
ASAlexandre de Spindler
Alexandre de Spindler
EGElena Gavagnin
Elena Gavagnin