Jia Ma

Prof. Jia Ma


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

1Year (2026-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 October 2026 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LMLan Mu
Lan Mu
JMJia Ma
Jia Ma
ZFZhijin Feng
Zhijin Feng
YZYuyang Zhang
Yuyang Zhang
FRFei Ren
Fei Ren
Water inequality arises when regional water use is disproportionate to local socioeconomic and resource conditions. Yet, little is known about whether artificial intelligence (AI) technological innovation is associated with this mismatch. Using panel data for 31 provincial-level regions in mainland China from 2015 to 2024, this study examines the relationship between AI technological innovation and regional water inequality, measured from a water footprint perspective. The annual number of patent applications related to AI is used to measure regional AI technological innovation, and an instrumental variable generalized method of moments (IV-GMM) approach is employed to address potential endogeneity. The estimates show that AI technological innovation is significantly associated with lower regional water inequality: a 1% increase in AI patenting is associated with an approximately 0.249% decrease in the water inequality index. This result remains robust after adding further controls and applying alternative instrumental variable estimators. The quantile estimates remain negative across the conditional distribution of water inequality, although formal tests do not indicate statistically significant differences. AI technological innovation is also positively associated with financial development and industrial structure upgrading, providing evidence consistent with their potential roles as channels. The association is statistically significant in provinces with lower tax burdens and higher levels of industrialization, although formal differences between groups are statistically significant only for tax burden. These findings suggest that AI innovation policies may be more effective when combined with practical applications in water governance and adapted to local fiscal and industrial conditions.

17 July 2026 in Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LMLan Mu
Lan Mu
HZHang Zhang
Hang Zhang
JMJia Ma
Jia Ma
Agricultural E-commerce alters farmers’ production and marketing decisions, thereby shaping land-use intensity and livelihood stability. In the context of rapid digital transformation, enhancing farmers’ livelihood resilience is critical to sustainable rural development and resilience to socio-economic and environmental shocks. Using survey data from 542 rural communities in China, this study examines the relationship between agricultural E-commerce participation and farmers’ livelihood resilience across its multidimensional components. The empirical results show that participation in agricultural E-commerce is positively associated with farmers’ overall livelihood resilience, with notable positive associations with buffering capacity, learning capacity, and self-organization capacity. Among these, learning capacity exhibits the strongest association, followed by buffering capacity and self-organization capacity. Farmers’ digital capability positively moderates the relationship between E-commerce participation and livelihood resilience by facilitating access to and effective use of digital information, thereby lowering information costs and contributing to returns from online market participation. Heterogeneity analysis further indicates that the positive association between agricultural E-commerce participation and livelihood resilience is stronger among cooperative members, households with adequate production capital, non-agricultural households, and families with sufficient labor resources. By identifying the role of agricultural E-commerce in building livelihood resilience, this study contributes to the empirical understanding of how digital engagement may support inclusive and sustainable rural development under similar institutional conditions.