Anthony Jakeman

Prof. Anthony Jakeman

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

52Years (1975-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2013 in Environmental Modelling & Software
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NBNeil D. Bennett
Neil D. Bennett
BCBarry Croke
Barry Croke
GGGiorgio Guariso
Giorgio Guariso
JGJoseph Guillaume
Joseph Guillaume
SHSerena (Chen) Hamilton
Serena (Chen) Hamilton
VAVazken Andreassian
Vazken Andreassian

1 August 1993 in Water Resources Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AJAnthony Jakeman
Anthony Jakeman
GHG. M. Hornberger
G. M. Hornberger

1 May 2006 in Environmental Modelling & Software
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AJAnthony Jakeman
Anthony Jakeman
RLR.A. Letcher
R.A. Letcher
JNJ.P. Norton
J.P. Norton

1 October 2003 in Environmental Modelling & Software
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WMW.S. Merritt
W.S. Merritt
RLR.A. Letcher
R.A. Letcher
AJAnthony Jakeman
Anthony Jakeman

1 September 2013 in Environmental Modelling & Software
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
R(Rebecca A. Kelly (Letcher)
Rebecca A. Kelly (Letcher)
AJAnthony Jakeman
Anthony Jakeman
OBOlivier Barreteau
Olivier Barreteau
MBMark E. Borsuk
Mark E. Borsuk
Sondoss ElsawahSondoss Elsawah
Sondoss Elsawah
Alexey VoinovAlexey Voinov
Alexey Voinov

27 July 2015 in Water Resources Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MAM. J. Asher
M. J. Asher
BCBarry Croke
Barry Croke
AJAnthony Jakeman
Anthony Jakeman
LPLuk J M Peeters
Luk J M Peeters
The spatially and temporally variable parameters and inputs to complex groundwater models typically result in long runtimes which hinder comprehensive calibration, sensitivity, and uncertainty analysis. Surrogate modeling aims to provide a simpler, and hence faster, model which emulates the specified output of a more complex model in function of its inputs and parameters. In this review paper, we summarize surrogate modeling techniques in three categories: data‐driven, projection, and hierarchical‐based approaches. Data‐driven surrogates approximate a groundwater model through an empirical model that captures the input‐output mapping of the original model. Projection‐based models reduce the dimensionality of the parameter space by projecting the governing equations onto a basis of orthonormal vectors. In hierarchical or multifidelity methods the surrogate is created by simplifying the representation of the physical system, such as by ignoring certain processes, or reducing the numerical resolution. In discussing the application to groundwater modeling of these methods, we note several imbalances in the existing literature: a large body of work on data‐driven approaches seemingly ignores major drawbacks to the methods; only a fraction of the literature focuses on creating surrogates to reproduce outputs of fully distributed groundwater models, despite these being ubiquitous in practice; and a number of the more advanced surrogate modeling methods are yet to be fully applied in a groundwater modeling context.