Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is a common clinical entity in people with asthma. EIB is characterized by postexercise airway obstruction that results in symptoms such as coughing, dyspnea, wheezing, chest tightness, and increased fatigue. The underlying mechanism of EIB is not completely understood. “Osmotic theory” and “thermal or vascular theory” have been proposed. Initial assessment must include a specific work-up to exclude alternative diagnoses like exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction (EILO), cardiac disease, or physical deconditioning. Detailed medical history and clinical examination must be followed by basal spirometry and exercise challenge test. The standardized treadmill running (TR) test, a controlled and standardized method to assess bronchial response to exercise, is the most adopted exercise challenge test for children aged at least 8 years. In the TR test, the goal is to reach the target heart rate in a short period and maintain it for at least 6 min. The test is then followed by spirometry at specific time points (5, 10, 15, and 30 min after exercise). In addition, bronchoprovocation tests like dry air hyperpnea (exercise and eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea) or osmotic aerosols (inhaled mannitol) can be considered when the diagnosis is uncertain. Treatment options include both pharmacological and behavioral approaches. Considering medications, the use of short-acting beta-agonists (SABA) just before exercise is the commonest option strategy, but daily inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) can also be considered, especially when EIB is not controlled with SABA only or when the patients practice physical activity very often. Among the behavioral approaches, warm-up before exercise, breathing through the nose or face mask, and avoiding polluted environments are all recommended strategies to reduce EIB risk. This review summarizes the latest evidence published over the last 10 years on the pathogenesis, diagnosis using spirometry and indirect bronchoprovocation tests, and treatment strategies, including SABA and ICS, of EIB. A specific focus has been placed on EIB management in young athletes, since this condition can not only prevent them from practicing regular physical activity but also competitive sports.

Streptococcus pyogenes (Group A Streptococcus, GAS) is a major human pathogen capable of causing infections ranging from mild pharyngitis and impetigo to severe invasive diseases such as bacteremia, necrotizing fasciitis, and streptococcal toxic shock syndrome (STSS). Historically, the incidence of GAS infections declined during the early antibiotic era but began rising again from the early 2000s, driven partly by the emergence of hyper-virulent strains such as emm1 and emm12. From 2005 onward, significant increases in GAS infections were reported globally, accompanied by rising antibiotic resistance, particularly to macrolides and tetracyclines. During the COVID-19 pandemic, widespread public health measures led to a sharp decline in GAS infections, including invasive cases, but this trend reversed dramatically in late 2022 and 2023, with surges exceeding pre-pandemic levels, notably in children. Recent data implicate factors such as “immunity debt,” viral co-infections, and the spread of virulent clones like M1UK. Looking forward, continued surveillance of GAS epidemiology, virulence factors, and resistance patterns is critical. Moreover, the emergence of GAS isolates with reduced susceptibility to beta-lactams underscores the need for vigilance despite the absence of fully resistant strains. The development of an effective vaccine remains an urgent priority to reduce GAS disease burden and prevent severe outcomes. Future research should focus on vaccine development, molecular mechanisms of virulence, and strategies to curb antimicrobial resistance.

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is common in children with asthma but can be present also in children without asthma, especially athletes. Differential diagnosis includes several conditions such as exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction (EILO), cardiac disease, or physical deconditioning. Detailed medical history, clinical examination and specific tests are mandatory to exclude alternative diagnoses. Given the high prevalence of EIB in children and its potential impact on health, sport performance, and daily levels of physical activity, health care professionals should be aware of this condition and able to provide a specific work-up for its identification. The aims of the present study were: (a) to assess the agreement among hospital pediatricians and primary care pediatricians of Emilia-Romagna Region (Italy) about the management of EIB in children and (b) formulate statements in a consensus document to help clinicians in daily clinical practice. According to Delphi method, a panel of specialists scored 40 statements that were then revised and discussed during online meetings to reach full consensus. Statements were then formulated. To obtain full consensus, the questionnaire was administered in two rounds after full discussion of the uncertain topics on the basis of the latest evidence on EIB published over the last 10 years. Despite an overall agreement on EIB management, some gaps emerged in the sections dedicated to diagnosis and treatment. Nine summary statements on definition, pathogenesis, diagnostic work-up, treatment, and follow-up were eventually formulated. This study describes the knowledge of EIB in a group of pediatricians and highlights gaps and uncertainties in diagnosis and treatment. The creation of statements shared by the specialists of the same area may improve the management of EIB in children. However, more research and evidence are needed to better clarify the best treatment and to standardize the best diagnostic protocol limiting useless examinations but at the same time assuring the best management.

Background: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains a leading cause of pediatric morbidity and mortality worldwide, particularly in low-resource settings. Although antimicrobial therapy is the cornerstone of treatment, disease severity is often influenced not only by pathogen burden but also by dysregulated host inflammation. Systemic corticosteroids have therefore been investigated as adjunctive agents to reduce inflammation-mediated lung injury, but their role in children remains controversial. Methods: This narrative review summarizes current evidence on systemic corticosteroid use in pediatric pneumonia. The review focuses on biological mechanisms, clinical indications, patient selection, therapeutic regimens, timing and duration of therapy, clinical outcomes, and safety. Particular attention is given to severe CAP, Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia, complicated pneumonia with parapneumonic effusion or empyema, viral pneumonia, wheezing-associated phenotypes, and immunocompromised children. Results: Available evidence suggests that corticosteroids may provide benefit in selected pediatric phenotypes characterized by severe inflammation, respiratory compromise, refractory disease, or airway hyperreactivity. Reported benefits include faster fever resolution, reduction in inflammatory markers, shorter hospital stay, more rapid clinical stabilization, and improved radiographic recovery, particularly in severe or refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia and selected complicated cases. However, findings are inconsistent, and treatment effects appear strongly dependent on etiology, disease severity, timing of administration, corticosteroid regimen, and patient phenotype. Routine use in uncomplicated CAP or unselected pediatric populations is not supported. Potential adverse effects include hyperglycemia, gastrointestinal and neurobehavioral symptoms, sleep disturbance, immunosuppression with an increased risk of secondary infection, delayed viral clearance in selected viral infections, and possible masking of inadequate anti-infective response or evolving complications. Conclusions: Current evidence supports a cautious, individualized, phenotype-driven approach to corticosteroid therapy in pediatric CAP. Well-designed pediatric randomized controlled trials are needed to define precise indications, optimal regimens, timing, and long-term safety.

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has emerged as a microbiota-directed therapeutic strategy with established efficacy in recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) and expanding investigational applications in pediatric medicine. Given the central role of the gut microbiota in immune maturation, metabolic homeostasis, and colonization resistance—particularly during early life—restoring microbial diversity represents a biologically plausible intervention for disorders characterized by dysbiosis. This narrative review critically examines current evidence regarding the indications, efficacy, safety, and practical considerations of FMT in pediatric populations. A structured literature search was conducted across PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception through December 2025. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, observational studies, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and guideline statements addressing pediatric FMT. RCDI remains the primary and best-supported indication, with reported success rates exceeding 80% after a single FMT and approaching 90% with repeat procedures. Evidence for other indications—including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), malignancy-associated CDI, transplant recipients, multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) decolonization, neurodevelopmental disorders, allergic colitis, and functional gastrointestinal disorders—remains limited and heterogeneous. While short-term remission rates in pediatric ulcerative colitis appear promising, data derive largely from small, non-standardized studies, and long-term efficacy and safety remain insufficiently defined. FMT usage in immunocompromised children, particularly oncology and transplant populations, is controversial due to limited pediatric-specific evidence and theoretical risks. Substantial variability in donor screening, preparation methods, dosing, and administration routes further limits standardization. Currently, FMT should be considered established therapy for pediatric rCDI, whereas other applications require well-designed, multicenter trials with long-term follow-up to clarify safety and clinical benefit.

Background: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains a leading cause of pediatric morbid-ity and mortality worldwide, particularly in low-resource settings. Although antimicrobial therapy is the cornerstone of treatment, disease severity is often influenced not only by pathogen burden but also by dysregulated host inflammation. Systemic corticosteroids have therefore been investigated as adjunctive agents to reduce inflammation-mediated lung injury, but their role in children remains controversial. Methods: This narrative review summarizes current evidence on systemic cortico-steroid use in pediatric pneumonia. The review focuses on biological mechanisms, clinical indica-tions, patient selection, therapeutic regimens, timing and duration of therapy, clinical outcomes, and safety. Particular attention is given to severe CAP, Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia, complicated pneumonia with parapneumonic effusion or empyema, viral pneumonia, wheezing-associated phenotypes, and immunocompromised children. Results: Available evidence suggests that cortico-steroids may provide benefit in selected pediatric phenotypes characterized by severe inflammation, respiratory compromise, refractory disease, or airway hyperreactivity. Reported benefits include faster fever resolution, reduction in inflammatory markers, shorter hospital stay, more rapid clinical stabilization, and improved radiographic recovery, particularly in severe or refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia and selected complicated cases. However, findings are inconsistent, and treatment effects appear strongly dependent on etiology, disease severity, timing of administration, corticosteroid regimen, and patient phenotype. Routine use in uncomplicated CAP or unselected pediatric populations is not supported. Potential adverse effects include hyperglycemia, gastroin-testinal symptoms, behavioral changes, sleep disturbance, immunosuppression, and delayed viral clearance in selected viral infections. Conclusion: Current evidence supports a cautious, individu-alized, phenotype-driven approach to corticosteroid therapy in pediatric CAP. Well-designed pe-diatric randomized controlled trials are needed to define precise indications, optimal regimens, timing, and long-term safety.