Mark Glover

Dr. Mark Glover

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2011 in Cell Cycle
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CLCharles Chung Yun Leung
Charles Chung Yun Leung
MGMark Glover
Mark Glover
BRCA1 C-terminal (BRCT) domains are integral signaling modules in the DNA damage response (DDR). Aside from their established roles as phospho-peptide binding modules, BRCT domains have been implic...

9 May 2004 in Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RWR Scott Williams
R Scott Williams
MLMegan S Lee
Megan S Lee
DHD Duong Hau
D Duong Hau
MGMark Glover
Mark Glover

1 November 2004 in Trends in Biochemical Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MGMark Glover
Mark Glover
RWR. Scott Williams
R. Scott Williams
MLMegan S. Lee
Megan S. Lee

14 June 2010 in Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MLMegan S. Lee
Megan S. Lee
RGRuth Green
Ruth Green
SMSylvia M. Marsillac
Sylvia M. Marsillac
NCNicolas Coquelle
Nicolas Coquelle
RWR. Scott Williams
R. Scott Williams
MGMark Glover
Mark Glover
Genetic screening of the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1 has uncovered a large number of variants of uncertain clinical significance. Here, we use biochemical and cell-based transcriptional assays to assess the structural and functional defects associated with a large set of 117 distinct BRCA1 missense variants within the essential BRCT domain of the BRCA1 protein that have been documented in individuals with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer. In the first method, we used limited proteolysis to assess the protein folding stability of each of the mutants compared with the wild-type. In the second method, we used a phosphopeptide pull-down assay to assess the ability of each of the variants to specifically interact with a peptide containing a pSer-X-X-Phe motif, a known functional target of the BRCA1 BRCT domain. Finally, we used transcriptional assays to assess the ability of each BRCT variant to act as a transcriptional activation domain in human cells. Through a correlation of the assay results with available family history and clinical data, we define limits to predict the disease risk associated with each variant. Forty-two of the variants show little effect on function and are likely to represent variants with little or no clinical significance; 50 display a clear functional effect and are likely to represent pathogenic variants; and the remaining 25 variants display intermediate activities. The excellent agreement between the structure/function effects of these mutations and available clinical data supports the notion that functional and structure information can be useful in the development of models to assess cancer risk. Cancer Res; 70(12); 4880–90. ©2010 AACR.

1 September 2005 in Journal of Biological Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MLMegan S. Lee
Megan S. Lee
RERoss A. Edwards
Ross A. Edwards
GTGina L. Thede
Gina L. Thede
MGMark Glover
Mark Glover
MDC1 (mediator of DNA damage checkpoint protein 1) regulates the recognition and repair of DNA double strand breaks in mammalian cells through its interactions with nuclear foci containing the COOH-terminally phosphorylated form of the histone variant, H2AX. Here we demonstrate that the tandem BRCT repeats of MDC1 directly bind to the phosphorylated tail of H2AX-Ser(P)-Gln-Glu-Tyr, in a manner that is critically dependent on the free carboxylate group of the COOH-terminal Tyr residue. We have determined the x-ray crystal structure of the MDC1 BRCT repeats at 1.45 Å resolution. By a comparison with the structure of the BRCA1 BRCT bound to a phosphopeptide, we suggest that two arginine residues in MDC1, Arg1932 and Arg1933 may recognize the COOH terminus of the peptide as well as the penultimate Glu of H2AX, while Gln2013 may provide additional specificity for the COOH-terminal Tyr.

13 July 2012 in Molecular Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JWJoyce J. W. Wong
Joyce J. W. Wong
JLJun Lu
Jun Lu
MGMark Glover
Mark Glover
Summary: The tra operon of the prototypical F plasmid and its relatives enables transfer of a copy of the plasmid to other bacterial cells via the process of conjugation. Tra proteins assemble to form the transferosome, the transmembrane pore through which the DNA is transferred, and the relaxosome, a complex of DNA‐binding proteins at the origin of DNA transfer. F‐like plasmid conjugation is characterized by a high degree of plasmid specificity in the interactions of tra components, and is tightly regulated at the transcriptional, translational and post‐translational levels. Over the past decade, X‐ray crystallography of conjugative components has yielded insights into both specificity and regulatory mechanisms. Conjugation is repressed by FinO, an RNA chaperone which increases the lifetime of the small RNA, FinP. Recent work has resulted in a detailed model of FinO/FinP interactions and the discovery of a family of FinO‐like RNA chaperones. Relaxosome components include TraI, a relaxase/helicase, and TraM, which mediates signalling between the transferosome and relaxosome for transfer initiation. The structures of TraI and TraM bound to oriT DNA reveal the basis of specific recognition of DNA for their cognate plasmid. Specificity also exists in TraI and TraM interactions with the transferosome protein TraD.