Fishery anesthetics are extensively employed in aquaculture to mitigate stress and reduce mortality during handling, transportation, and processing of farmed fish. While they enhance operational efficiency and reduce economic losses for fish merchants, the potential residual presence of these anesthetics raises concerns regarding human health risks and environmental impact. This review examines six commonly used anesthetics in aquaculture—eugenol, MS-222, benzocaine, 2-phenoxyethanol, diazepam, and quinaldine—focusing on their mechanisms of action, application risks, ecotoxicological effects, and methods for residue analysis. The objective is to promote the safe and informed application of these anesthetics, mitigate their biological toxicity, and minimize their ecological impact. Furthermore, the review provides technical insights into monitoring and managing anesthetic residues in aquaculture to ensure the safety of aquatic products and safeguard environmental health while also supporting the development of sustainable aquaculture practices.

To isolate high-quality total RNA from Fallopia multiflora tuberous roots is difficult because of the presence of high levels of carbohydrates, phenolics, and other secondary metabolites. Since several procedures specialized for RNA isolation from polysaccharides and phenols rich tissues have resulted in poor yields, in this study, we developed a modified protocol that was derived from the traditional CTAB method. The protocol was able to produce high-quality and intact RNA from the tuberous roots of F. multiflora. The yield of total RNA was more than 0.15 mg/g fresh weight, with an A260/A280 ratio of 1.9–2.0. The obtained RNA was of sufficient quality and suitable for downstream application such as reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), Northern hybridization, and cDNA library construction. The protocol may also have wider applicability for total RNA isolation from other plant species with tuberous roots.

Fishery anesthetics are extensively employed in aquaculture to mitigate stress and reduce mortality during handling, transportation, and processing of fish. While they enhance operational efficiency and reduce economic losses for fish merchants, the potential residual presence of these anesthetics raises concerns regarding human health risks and environmental impact. This review examines six commonly used anesthetics in aquaculture—eugenol, MS-222, benzocaine, 2-phenoxyethanol, diazepam, and quinaldine—focusing on their mechanisms of action, application risks, ecotoxicological effects, and methods for residue analysis. The objective is to promote the safe and informed application of these anesthetics, mitigate their biological toxicity, and minimize their ecological impact. Furthermore, the review provides technical insights into monitoring and managing anesthetic residues in aquaculture to ensure the safety of aquatic products and safeguard environmental health, while also supporting the development of sustainable aquaculture practices.