Fluorouracil (5FU) is still considered the most active antineoplastic agent in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. The drug needs to be converted to the nucleotide level in order to exert its effect. It can be incorporated into RNA leading to interference with the maturation of nuclear RNA. However, its conversion to 5-fluoro-2'deoxy-5' monophosphate (FdUMP) leading to inhibition of thymidylate synthase (TS) and subsequently of DNA synthesis, is considered to be its main mechanism of action. In the presence of a folate cofactor a covalent ternary complex is formed, the stability of which is the main determinant of the action of 5FU. Resistance against 5FU can be mainly attributed to aberrations in its metabolism or to alterations of TS, eg, gene amplification, altered kinetics in respect to nucleotides or folates. Biochemical modulation of 5FU metabolism can be applied to overcome resistance against 5FU. A variety of normal purines, pyrimidines, and other antimetabolites have been studied in this respect, but only some of them have been clinically successful. Delayed administration of uridine has recently been shown to "rescue" mice and patients from toxicity, while pretreatment with leucovorin is the most promising combination to enhance the therapeutic efficacy. 5FU is frequently administered in an intravenous (IV) injection, and shows a rapid distribution and a triphasic elimination. The nonlinearity of 5FU pharmacokinetics is related to saturation of its degradation. Continuous infusion of 5FU led to different kinetics. Regional administration, such as hepatic artery infusion, offers a way to achieve higher drug concentrations in liver metastases and is accompanied by lower systemic concentration. The current status of the biochemical and pharmacokinetic data is reviewed.

The human multidrug-resistance protein ( MRP ) gene family contains at least six members: MRP1 , encoding the multidrug-resistance protein; MRP2 or cMOAT , encoding the canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter; and four homologs, called MRP3 , MRP4 , MRP5 , and MRP6 . In this report, we characterize MRP3, the closest homolog of MRP1. Cell lines were retrovirally transduced with MRP3 cDNA, and new monoclonal antibodies specific for MRP3 were generated. We show that MRP3 is an organic anion and multidrug transporter, like the GS-X pumps MRP1 and MRP2. In Madin–Darby canine kidney II cells, MRP3 routes to the basolateral membrane and mediates transport of the organic anion S -(2,4-dinitrophenyl-)glutathione toward the basolateral side of the monolayer. In ovarian carcinoma cells (2008), expression of MRP3 results in low-level resistance to the epipodophyllotoxins etoposide and teniposide. In short-term drug exposure experiments, MRP3 also confers high-level resistance to methotrexate. Neither 2008 cells nor Madin–Darby canine kidney II cells overexpressing MRP3 showed an increase in glutathione export or a decrease in the level of intracellular glutathione, in contrast to cells overexpressing MRP1 or MRP2 . We discuss the possible function of MRP3 in (hepatic) physiology and its potential contribution to drug resistance of cancer cells.

Purpose: Resistance to antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as sunitinib is an important clinical problem, but its underlying mechanisms are largely unknown. We analyzed tumor sunitinib levels in mice and patients and studied sensitivity and resistance mechanisms to sunitinib. Experimental Design: Intratumoral and plasma sunitinib concentrations in mice and patients were determined. Sunitinib exposure on tumor cell proliferation was examined. Resistant tumor cells were derived by continuous exposure and studied for alterations in intracellular sunitinib accumulation and activity. Results: Intratumoral concentrations of sunitinib in mice and patients were 10.9 ± 0.5 and 9.5 ± 2.4 μmol/L, respectively, whereas plasma concentrations were 10-fold lower, 1.0 ± 0.1 and 0.3 ± 0.1 μmol/L, respectively. Sunitinib inhibited tumor cell growth at clinically relevant concentrations in vitro, with IC₅₀ values of 1.4 to 2.3 μmol/L. Continuous exposure to sunitinib resulted in resistance of 786-O renal and HT-29 colon cancer cells. Fluorescent microscopy revealed intracellular sunitinib distribution to acidic lysosomes, which were significantly higher expressed in resistant cells. A 1.7- to 2.5-fold higher sunitinib concentration in resistant cells was measured because of increased lysosomal sequestration. Despite the higher intracellular sunitinib accumulation, levels of the key signaling p-Akt and p-ERK 1/2 were unaffected and comparable with untreated parental cells, indicating reduced effectiveness of sunitinib. Conclusion: We report that sunitinib inhibits tumor cell proliferation at clinically relevant concentrations and found lysosomal sequestration to be a novel mechanism of sunitinib resistance. This finding warrants clinical evaluation whether targeting lysosomal function will overcome sunitinib resistance. Clin Cancer Res; 17(23); 7337–46. ©2011 AACR.