Simon Wing

Dr. Simon Wing

The Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 September 2014 in Space Science Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JJJay Johnson
Jay Johnson
Simon WingSimon Wing
Simon Wing
PDPeter A. Delamere
Peter A. Delamere

9 April 2005 in Journal of Geophysical Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Simon WingSimon Wing
Simon Wing
JJJay Johnson
Jay Johnson
JJJ. Jen
J. Jen
CMC.‐I. Meng
C.‐I. Meng
DSD. G. Sibeck
D. G. Sibeck
KTK. Takahashi
K. Takahashi
Magnetically active times, e.g., Kp > 5, are notoriously difficult to predict, precisely the times when such predictions are crucial to the space weather users. Taking advantage of the routinely available solar wind measurements at Langrangian point (L1) and nowcast Kps, Kp forecast models based on neural networks were developed with the focus on improving the forecast for active times. To satisfy different needs and operational constraints, three models were developed: (1) a model that inputs nowcast Kp and solar wind parameters and predicts Kp 1 hour ahead; (2) a model with the same input as model 1 and predicts Kp 4 hour ahead; and (3) a model that inputs only solar wind parameters and predicts Kp 1 hour ahead (the exact prediction lead time depends on the solar wind speed and the location of the solar wind monitor). Extensive evaluations of these models and other major operational Kp forecast models show that while the new models can predict Kps more accurately for all activities, the most dramatic improvements occur for moderate and active times. Information dynamics analysis of Kp suggests that geospace is more dominated by internal dynamics near solar minimum than near solar maximum, when it is more directly driven by external inputs, namely solar wind and interplanetary magnetic field (IMF).

20 August 2005 in Journal of Geophysical Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Simon WingSimon Wing
Simon Wing
JJJay Johnson
Jay Johnson
PNP. T. Newell
P. T. Newell
CMC.‐I. Meng
C.‐I. Meng
During periods of northward IMF, plasma sheet ions often have two components: hot (magnetospheric origin) and cold (magnetosheath origin). The temperatures of the cold‐component ions are ∼30–40% higher in the dawn sector compared to the dusk sector, implying the dawnside magnetosheath ion heating of ∼30–40%. As a result, the magnetosheath ions are less distinguishable from the hot‐component ions, which have lower temperatures on the dawnside, leading to a higher occurrence of the ions having (apparent) one‐component distribution. As the duration of the hourly averaged IMF being northward (Δt) increases from 1 to 10 hours, the occurrence of two‐component ions increases from 65% to 83% in the dusk flank, but in the dawn flank it remains relatively stable at around 45%. In contrast, the occurrence of ions best characterized by kappa (κ) distribution increases from 25% to 35% in the dawn flank whereas in the dusk flank it remains relatively insensitive to Δt (10%). The occurrence of a one‐component Maxwellian distribution appears to be most pronounced in the region of the plasma sheet close to the midnight meridian, and these ions appear to be characteristic of the nominal plasma sheet (hot component) ions. The densification of the plasma sheet, as Δt increases, mainly results from the influx of the magnetosheath ions. However, the cooling of the plasma sheet ions can be attributed not only to the influx of the cold magnetosheath ions but also to the cooling of the nominal plasma sheet ions. The dawn‐dusk asymmetries observed in the cold magnetosheath ion profiles should provide constraints that can help determine the roles of various proposed magnetosheath ion entry mechanisms.

29 July 2016 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Simon WingSimon Wing
Simon Wing
JJJay Johnson
Jay Johnson
ECEnrico Camporeale
Enrico Camporeale
GRGeoffrey D. Reeves
Geoffrey D. Reeves
The solar wind‐magnetosphere system is nonlinear. The solar wind drivers of geosynchronous electrons with energy range of 1.8–3.5 MeV are investigated using mutual information, conditional mutual information (CMI), and transfer entropy (TE). These information theoretical tools can establish linear and nonlinear relationships as well as information transfer. The information transfer from solar wind velocity (Vsw) to geosynchronous MeV electron flux (Je) peaks with a lag time of 2 days. As previously reported, Je is anticorrelated with solar wind density (nsw) with a lag of 1 day. However, this lag time and anticorrelation can be attributed at least partly to the Je(t + 2 days) correlation with Vsw(t) and nsw(t + 1 day) anticorrelation with Vsw(t). Analyses of solar wind driving of the magnetosphere need to consider the large lag times, up to 3 days, in the (Vsw, nsw) anticorrelation. Using CMI to remove the effects of Vsw, the response of Je to nsw is 30% smaller and has a lag time < 24 h, suggesting that the MeV electron loss mechanism due to nsw or solar wind dynamic pressure has to start operating in < 24 h. nsw transfers about 36% as much information as Vsw (the primary driver) to Je. Nonstationarity in the system dynamics is investigated using windowed TE. When the data are ordered according to transfer entropy value, it is possible to understand details of the triangle distribution that has been identified between Je(t + 2 days) versus Vsw(t).

1 July 2014 in Annales Geophysicae
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AWA. P. Walsh
A. P. Walsh
SHS. Haaland
S. Haaland
Colin ForsythColin Forsyth
Colin Forsyth
AKAmy Keesee
Amy Keesee
JKJ. Kissinger
J. Kissinger
MTM. G. G. T. Taylor
M. G. G. T. Taylor
Dawn–dusk asymmetries are ubiquitous features of the coupled solar-wind–magnetosphere–ionosphere system. During the last decades, increasing availability of satellite and ground-based measurements has made it possible to study these phenomena in more detail. Numerous publications have documented the existence of persistent asymmetries in processes, properties and topology of plasma structures in various regions of geospace. In this paper, we present a review of our present knowledge of some of the most pronounced dawn–dusk asymmetries. We focus on four key aspects: (1) the role of external influences such as the solar wind and its interaction with the Earth's magnetosphere; (2) properties of the magnetosphere itself; (3) the role of the ionosphere and (4) feedback and coupling between regions. We have also identified potential inconsistencies and gaps in our understanding of dawn–dusk asymmetries in the Earth's magnetosphere and ionosphere.

4 November 2014 in Space Science Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Simon WingSimon Wing
Simon Wing
JJJay Johnson
Jay Johnson
CCC. C. Chaston
C. C. Chaston
MEMarius Echim
Marius Echim
CEC. P. Escoubet
C. P. Escoubet
CWC.-P. Wang
C.-P. Wang