Christine Pirker

Dr. Christine Pirker


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 November 2018 in Chemical Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BEBernhard Englinger
Bernhard Englinger
CPChristine Pirker
Christine Pirker
PHPetra Heffeter
Petra Heffeter
ATAlessio Terenzi
Alessio Terenzi
CKChristian Kowol
Christian Kowol
Walter BergerWalter Berger
Walter Berger

15 July 2009 in Clinical Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KSKatharina Schmid
Katharina Schmid
NONatalie Oehl
Natalie Oehl
FWFritz Wrba
Fritz Wrba
RPRobert Pirker
Robert Pirker
CPChristine Pirker
Christine Pirker
MFMartin Filipits
Martin Filipits
Purpose: The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and its downstream factors KRAS and BRAF are mutated with different frequencies in non–small cell lung cancer and mutations predict clinical response to EGFR inhibitors. The present study compared the mutational status of EGFR, KRAS, and BRAF in primary tumors with the one in corresponding lymph node metastases. Experimental Design: Direct bidirectional sequencing of EGFR gene exons 18 to 21, KRAS gene codons 12/13 and 61 to 68, and BRAF exon 15 was done on 96 paired samples of primary lung adenocarcinomas and corresponding locoregional lymph node metastases. In addition, comparative genomic hybridization analyses in two pairs of corresponding primary and metastatic tumor samples with discordant EGFR mutation status were done. Results: Mutations in EGFR, KRAS, and BRAF were observed in 7 (7%), 36 (38%), and 2 (2%) patients, respectively. Interestingly, KRAS mutations were observed in two patients with an EGFR mutation. Mutations in primary tumors and lymph node metastases were identical in 1 of 7 (14%) patients in case of EGFR and 11 of 36 (31%) patients in case of KRAS. One patient harbored different KRAS mutations in primary and corresponding metastatic tumors. Comparative genomic hybridization analysis revealed similar patterns of chromosomal changes, strongly supporting a common clonal origin of primary tumors and metastases. Conclusions: The possibility of differences in the mutational status of EGFR, KRAS, BRAF between primary tumors and corresponding lymph node metastases should be considered whenever these mutations are used for the selection of patients for EGFR-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy.

1 December 2016 in Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ATAlessio Terenzi
Alessio Terenzi
CPChristine Pirker
Christine Pirker
BKBernhard K. Keppler
Bernhard K. Keppler
Walter BergerWalter Berger
Walter Berger

11 July 2018 in Neuro-Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SSSabine Spiegl-Kreinecker
Sabine Spiegl-Kreinecker
DLDaniela Lötsch
Daniela Lötsch
KNKatharina Neumayer
Katharina Neumayer
LKLucia Kastler
Lucia Kastler
JGJohannes Gojo
Johannes Gojo
Walter BergerWalter Berger
Walter Berger
Meningiomas are mostly benign tumors tending to progress to higher-grade lesions. Mutations in the telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) gene promoter are comparably rare in meningioma, but were recently suggested to predict risk of recurrence and progression. Here we have analyzed a cohort of World Health Organization grades I–III meningiomas regarding the impact of TERT promoter mutations on patient prognosis and in vitro cell propagation feasibility. From 110 meningioma patients, 128 tissue samples were analyzed for the TERT promoter mutations C228T and C250T by direct sequencing. Of the 128 samples, 121 were tested for cell propagation in vitro. Telomerase activity, TERT mRNA expression, and telomere lengths were investigated by telomeric repeat amplification protocol assay, reverse transcription PCR, and quantitative PCR, respectively. Impact of the E-twenty-six (ETS) transcription factor inhibitor YK-4–279 on cell viability and TERT promoter activity was analyzed. TERT promoter mutations were found in 5.5% of all samples analyzed and were associated with a significantly upregulated telomerase activity and TERT mRNA expression (P < 0.0001 both). Regarding telomere lengths, no significant difference between the TERT promoter wild-type and mutated subgroups was detected. Patients with TERT promoter mutated tumors exhibited significantly shorter overall survival (P = 0.0006; 53.8 vs 115.6 mo). The presence of TERT promoter mutations but not telomerase activity or TERT mRNA expression predicted indefinite cell growth in vitro. TERT promoter mutated meningioma cells were hypersensitive against the ETS transcription factor inhibitor YK-4–279, inducing a distinct downregulation of TERT promoter activity. TERT promoter mutations drive meningioma aggressiveness, resulting in reduced patient survival, but might also open novel therapeutic options for progressive disease.

19 July 2010 in The FASEB Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GGGwendoline Van Goietsenoven
Gwendoline Van Goietsenoven
JHJenna Hutton
Jenna Hutton
JBJean‐Paul Becker
Jean‐Paul Becker
BLBenjamin Lallemand
Benjamin Lallemand
FRFrancis Robert
Francis Robert
VMVéronique Mathieu
Véronique Mathieu
Melanomas display poor response rates to adjuvant therapies because of their intrinsic resistance to proapoptotic stimuli. This study indicates that such resistance can be overcome, at least partly, through the targeting of eEF1A elongation factor with narciclasine, an Amaryllidaceae isocarbostyril controlling plant growth. Narciclasine displays IC 50 growth inhibitory values between 30–100 nM in melanoma cell lines, irrespective of their levels of resistance to proapoptotic stimuli. Normal noncancerous cell lines are much less affected. At nontoxic doses, narciclasine also significantly improves ( P =0.004) the survival of mice bearing metastatic apoptosis‐resistant melanoma xenografts in their brain. The eEF1A targeting with narciclasine (50 nM) leads to 1 ) marked actin cytoskeleton disorganization, resulting in cytokinesis impairment, and 2 ) protein synthesis impairment (elongation and initiation steps), whereas apoptosis is induced at higher doses only (≥200 nM). In addition to molecular docking validation and identification of potential binding sites, we biochemically confirmed that narciclasine directly binds to human recombinant and yeast‐purified eEF1A in a nanomolar range, but not to actin or elongation factor 2, and that 5 nM narciclasine is sufficient to impair eEF1A‐related actin bundling activity. eEF1A is thus a potential target to combat melanomas regardless of their apoptosis‐sensitivity, and this finding reconciles the pleiotropic cytostatic of narciclasine.—Van Goietsenoven, G., Hutton, J., Becker, J.‐P., Lallemand, B., Robert, F., Lefranc, F., Pirker, C., Vandenbussche, G., Van Antwerpen, P., Evidente, A., Berger, W., Prevost, M., Pelletier, J., Kiss, R., Goss Kinzy, T., Kornienko, A., Mathieu, V. Targeting of eEF1A with Amaryllidaceae isocarbostyrils as a strategy to combat melanomas. FASEB J . 24, 4575–4584 (2010). www.fasebj.org

13 February 2015 in Neuro-Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSabine Spiegl-Kreinecker
Sabine Spiegl-Kreinecker
DLDaniela Lötsch
Daniela Lötsch
Bahil GhanimBahil Ghanim
Bahil Ghanim
CPChristine Pirker
Christine Pirker
TMThomas Mohr
Thomas Mohr
Walter BergerWalter Berger
Walter Berger
Expression of the telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) might be altered by activating mutations of the rs2853669 polymorphism within the promoter region. Here we investigate the impact of these genomic alterations on telomerase activation and dissect their prognostic potential in glioblastoma (GBM). The respective TERT promoter region was sequenced in 126 GBM tissues and compared with clinical parameters and glioma biomarkers MGMT promoter methylation and IDH1 mutation. TERT mRNA expression, telomerase activity, and telomere lengths were determined by reverse transcriptase PCR, TRAP assay, and real-time PCR, respectively. Seventy-three percent of GBM patients harbored TERT promoter mutations associated with enhanced telomerase activity and TERT mRNA expression but reduced telomere lengths (P < .001 for all). Patients with mutated tumors exhibited significantly shorter overall survival in the entire cohort (11.5 vs 23.1 months; P < .0001) and in the primary GBM patient subgroup lacking IDH1 mutations (n = 120; P = .0084). This prognostic impact was confined to younger patients (aged <65 years), while the negative prognostic power of enhanced age at diagnosis was limited to those patients lacking TERT promoter mutations. Presence of the common single nucleotide polymorphism rs2853669, disrupting an endogenous Ets2 transcription factor-binding site, was associated with improved survival exclusively in patients with a wild-type TERT promoter. On the contrary, the shortest mean overall survival was detected in those patients harboring both an activating TERT promoter mutation and homozygous rs2853669 alleles. In summary, TERT promoter mutations are powerful prognosticators for worse course of disease in human GBM patients but their prognostic value is influenced by the rs2853669 polymorphism and age at diagnosis.