Systemic therapy of breast cancer can include chemotherapy, hormonal therapy and targeted therapy. Prognostic biomarkers are able to predict survival and predictive biomarkers are able to predict therapy response. In this report, we describe the initial release of the first available online tool able to identify gene expression‐based predictive biomarkers using transcriptomic data of a large set of breast cancer patients. Published gene expression data of 36 publicly available datasets were integrated with treatment data into a unified database. Response to therapy was determined using either author‐reported pathological complete response data (n = 1,775) or relapse‐free survival status at 5 years (n = 1,329). Treatment data includes chemotherapy (n = 2,108), endocrine therapy (n = 971) and anti‐human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) therapy (n = 267). The transcriptomic database includes 20,089 unique genes and 54,675 probe sets. Gene expression and therapy response are compared using receiver operating characteristics and Mann–Whitney tests. We demonstrate the utility of the pipeline by cross‐validating 23 paclitaxel resistance‐associated genes in different molecular subtypes of breast cancer. An additional set of established biomarkers including TP53 for chemotherapy in Luminal breast cancer (p = 1.01E‐19, AUC = 0.769), HER2 for trastuzumab therapy (p = 8.4E‐04, AUC = 0.629) and PGR for hormonal therapy (p = 8.6E‐05, AUC = 0.7), are also endorsed. The tool is designed to validate and rank new predictive biomarker candidates in real time. By analyzing the selected genes in a large set of independent patients, one can select the most robust candidates and quickly eliminate those that are most likely to fail in a clinical setting. The analysis tool is accessible at www.rocplot.org.

Background: A meta-analysis is a quantitative, formal study design in epidemiology and clinical medicine that systematically integrates and quantitatively synthesizes findings from multiple independent studies. This approach not only enhances statistical power but also enables the exploration of effects across diverse populations and helps resolve controversies arising from conflicting studies. Objective: This study aims to develop and implement a user-friendly tool for conducting meta-analyses, addressing the need for an accessible platform that simplifies the complex statistical procedures required for evidence synthesis while maintaining methodological rigor. Methods: The platform available at MetaAnalysisOnline.com enables comprehensive meta-analyses through an intuitive web interface, requiring no programming expertise or command-line operations. The system accommodates diverse data types including binary (total and event numbers), continuous (mean and SD), and time-to-event data (hazard rates with CIs), while implementing both fixed-effect and random-effect models using established statistical approaches such as DerSimonian-Laird, Mantel-Haenszel, and inverse variance methods for effect size estimation and heterogeneity assessment. Results: In addition to statistical tests, graphical representations including the forest plot, the funnel plot, and the z score plot can be drawn. A forest plot is highly effective in illustrating heterogeneity and pooled results. The risk of publication bias can be revealed by a funnel plot. A z score plot provides a visual assessment of whether more research is needed to establish a reliable conclusion. All the discussed models and visualization options are integrated into the registration-free web-based portal. Leveraging MetaAnalysisOnline.com's capabilities, we examined treatment-related adverse events in patients with cancer receiving perioperative anti–PD-1 immunotherapy through a systematic review encompassing 10 studies with 8099 total participants. Meta-analysis revealed that anti–PD-1 therapy doubled the risk of adverse events (risk ratio 2.15, 95% CI 1.39-3.32), with significant between-study heterogeneity (I2=95%) and publication bias detected through the Egger test (P=.02). While these findings suggest increased toxicity associated with anti–PD-1 treatment, the z score analysis indicated that additional studies are needed for definitive conclusions. Conclusions: In summary, the web-based tool aims to bridge the void for clinical and life science researchers by offering a user-friendly alternative for the swift and reproducible meta-analysis of clinical and epidemiological trials.

The overall prognosis for colorectal cancer (CRC) remains challenging as the survival time varies widely, even in patients with the same stage of disease. Recent studies suggest prognostic relevance of the novel markers of systemic inflammation, the systemic immune–inflammation index (SII), and the systemic inflammation response index (SIRI). We conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis to assess the prognostic significance of the SII and the SIRI in CRC. We searched the relevant literature for observational studies, and random effects models were employed to conduct a statistical analysis using the metaanalysisonline.com platform. Pooled effect sizes were reported with hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Data from 29 studies published between 2016 and 2024, comprising 10,091 participants, were included in our meta-analysis on SII. CRC patients with high SII levels had worse disease outcomes, which were associated with poor OS (HR: 1.75; 95% CI: 1.4–2.19) and poor PFS/DFS/RFS (HR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.18–1.33). This increased risk of worse OS was present irrespective of the treatment strategy, sample size (<220 and ≥220), and cutoff used to define high and low SII (<550 and ≥550) groups. Based on data from five studies comprising 2362 participants, we found a strong association between the high SIRI and worse OS (HR: 2.65; 95% CI: 1.6–4.38) and DFS/RFS (HR: 2.04; 95% CI: 1.42–2.93). According to our results, both the SII and SIRI hold great promise as prognostic markers in CRC. Further validations are needed for their age- and stage-specific utility in the clinical routine.

Background: Population aging is a common demographic pattern in developed countries, and aging increases the risk of cancer. The disproportionately high cancer burden, as a consequence, is especially pronounced in Central and Eastern European countries, including Hungary. Methods: We summarized current and projected future cancer incidences and mortalities utilizing data from the last two decades. Predictions are based on cancer incidence and mortality collected between 1996 and 2015 in Hungary. In addition to the crude rates, data were age standardized to the European standard population (ESP) of 2013, ESP of 1976, and local census of 2011. Results: The lifetime probability of developing cancer and cancer-related mortality has already reached 56.9% and 27.6% in men, respectively, and 51.9% and 21.7% in women. Between 2016 and 2030, the total population is expected to shrink by 6%, while the number of 60-year olds and above will grow by 18%. This will lead to a 35% increase in cancer incidence and 30% increase in cancer death among 65–85-year olds. Joinpoint regression identified the period 2007–2015 as starting point for this coming increase in new cases. In women, lung and breast cancer will increase yearly by 1.9% and 1.7%, respectively, between 2016 and 2030, while in men, the prostate and colorectal cancer rates will increase yearly by 3.6% and 2.1%. Conclusion: In the aging population of Hungary, cancer incidence will increase considerably over previous projections. Although a large portion of the most rapidly rising cancers are avoidable by implementing public health programs, a substantial portion remains inevitably incurable.

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is one of the deadliest gynecological malignancies. Topotecan remains an essential tool in second-line therapy; even so, most patients develop resistance within a short period of time. We aimed to identify biomarkers of topotecan resistance by using gene expression signatures derived from patient specimens at surgery and available subsequent responses to therapy. Gene expression was collected for 1436 patients and 10,103 genes. Based on disease progression, patients were categorized as responders/nonresponders depending on their progression free survival (PFS) state at 9, 12, 15 and 18 months after surgery. For each gene, the median expression was compared between responders and nonresponders for two treatment regimens (chemotherapy including/excluding topotecan) with Mann–Whitney U test at each of the four different PFS cutoffs. Statistical significance was accepted in the case of p < 0.05 with a fold change (FC) ≥ 1.44. Four genes (EPB41L2, HLA-DQB1, LTF and SFRP1) were consistently overexpressed across multiple PFS cutoff times in initial tumor samples of patients with disease progression following topotecan treatment. A common theme linked to topotecan resistance was altered immune modulation. Genes associated with disease progression after systemic chemotherapy emphasize the role of the initial organization of the tumor microenvironment in therapy resistance. Our results uncover biomarkers with potential utility for patient stratification.

BACKGROUND: Distinguishing between unilateral and bilateral primary aldosteronism, a major cause of secondary hypertension, is crucial due to different treatment approaches. While adrenal venous sampling is the gold standard, its invasiveness, limited availability, and often difficult interpretation pose challenges. This study explores the utility of circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) and machine learning in distinguishing between unilateral and bilateral forms of primary aldosteronism. METHODS: MiRNA profiling was conducted on plasma samples from 18 patients with primary aldosteronism taken during adrenal venous sampling on an Illumina MiSeq platform. Bioinformatics and machine learning identified 9 miRNAs for validation by reverse transcription real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Validation was performed on a cohort consisting of 108 patients with known subdifferentiation. A 30-patient subset of the validation cohort involved both adrenal venous sampling and peripheral, the rest only peripheral samples. A neural network model was used for feature selection and comparison between adrenal venous sampling and peripheral samples, while a deep-learning model was used for classification. RESULTS: Our model identified 10 miRNA combinations achieving >85% accuracy in distinguishing unilateral primary aldosteronism and bilateral adrenal hyperplasia on a 30-sample subset, while also confirming the suitability of peripheral samples for analysis. The best model, involving 6 miRNAs, achieved an area under curve of 87.1%. Deep learning resulted in 100% accuracy on the subset and 90.9% sensitivity and 81.8% specificity on all 108 samples, with an area under curve of 86.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning analysis of circulating miRNAs offers a minimally invasive alternative for primary aldosteronism lateralization. Early identification of bilateral adrenal hyperplasia could expedite treatment initiation without the need for further localization, benefiting both patients and health care providers.