Mohammad Ahsen Soomro

Dr. Mohammad Ahsen Soomro

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

1Year (2026-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 April 2026 in Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMohammad Ahsen Soomro
Mohammad Ahsen Soomro
MAMohamed Ahmed
Mohamed Ahmed
AAAl Ola Abdallah
Al Ola Abdallah
NANausheen Ahmed
Nausheen Ahmed
JKJeries Kort
Jeries Kort

28 April 2026 in SSRN Electronic Journal
Verified
Preprint
Open access
MSMohammad Ahsen Soomro
Mohammad Ahsen Soomro
AVAmy Varghese
Amy Varghese
HSHala Soomro
Hala Soomro
AAAl-Ola Abdallah
Al-Ola Abdallah
FLForat G. Lutfi
Forat G. Lutfi
NANausheen Ahmed
Nausheen Ahmed
Key PointsQuestionDid cancer mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic deviate from expected pre-pandemic trends at the site-specific level?FindingsIn this population-based study of more than 60 million cancer deaths in the United States, overall cancer mortality remained aligned with pre-pandemic declines. However, site-specific counterfactual modeling revealed heterogeneous divergence, including excess mortality for Hodgkin lymphoma (mean +9.5%) and prostate cancer (mean +7.9%), and below-expected mortality for liver cancer (mean −15.5%), along with increases in deaths attributed to ill-defined cancer categories (mean +15.2%).MeaningThese findings suggest that pandemic-related health system disruption produced uneven, disease-specific mortality effects that are not captured by aggregate cancer mortality trends, highlighting the importance of site-level monitoring to detect delayed consequences of large-scale healthcare disruption.

28 June 2026 in Cancer Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMohammad Ahsen Soomro
Mohammad Ahsen Soomro
AVAmy Varghese
Amy Varghese
HSHala Soomro
Hala Soomro
AAAl-Ola Abdallah
Al-Ola Abdallah
FLForat G. Lutfi
Forat G. Lutfi
NANausheen Ahmed
Nausheen Ahmed

22 October 2026 in Current Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMohammad Ahsen Soomro
Mohammad Ahsen Soomro
AKAroog Khaliq
Aroog Khaliq
MAMuhammad Bilal Abid
Muhammad Bilal Abid
BPBarry Paul
Barry Paul
Shebli AtrashShebli Atrash
Shebli Atrash
AAAl-Ola Abdallah
Al-Ola Abdallah
Background: Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) has demonstrated substantial activity in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), but outcomes in real-world patients remain heterogeneous. Extramedullary disease (EMD) is an adverse phenotype, and prolonged cytopenias may complicate post-CAR-T recovery. We synthesized real-world standard-of-care ide-cel evidence to characterize EMD-associated efficacy outcomes and prolonged hematotoxicity. Methods: We performed a focused evidence synthesis of real-world ide-cel studies reporting EMD-stratified outcomes, cytopenias, hematopoietic interventions, or safety in RRMM. Data were extracted into a structured workbook. Because several US datasets were derived from potentially overlapping registry or consortium populations, primary EMD prevalence and progression-free survival (PFS) synthesis was restricted to non-overlapping EMD-stratified cohorts. Progression-free survival (PFS) was analyzed in parallel across contributing cohorts rather than pooled mathematically. Cytopenia outcomes were summarized descriptively at day 30/month 1 and day 90/month 3. Results: Five real-world studies were included. Across two non-overlapping ide-cel-only EMD-stratified cohorts, 111 of 510 infused patients had reported EMD, corresponding to a combined study-reported prevalence of 21.8% (17.0% in the French registry and 23.9% in the US cohort). Median PFS was shorter with EMD in both contributing cohorts: 6.21 versus 14.82 months in FENIX/DESCAR-T and 5.3 versus 11.1 months in the US EMD-focused cohort. Across both independent cohorts, presence of extramedullary disease was consistently associated with significantly inferior progression-free survival: median PFS was 6.21 months (95% CI: 4.01–NR) versus 14.82 months (95% CI: 11.30–18.37) in the French FENIX/DESCAR-T cohort (adjusted HR 3.15, 95% CI: 1.82–5.47; p < 0.0001), and 5.30 months (95% CI: 4.10–6.90) versus 11.10 months (95% CI: 9.20–12.60) in the US cohort (adjusted HR 1.50, 95% CI: 1.10–2.20; p = 0.02). In the US EMD-focused cohort, day-90 ORR was 52% with EMD versus 82% without EMD. EMD independently predicted inferior PFS in both adjusted analyses. A multicenter cohort evaluating both ide-cel and ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) contributed supportive evidence, with ide-cel-treated EMD patients achieving a best overall response rate (ORR) of 61% (≥PR per IMWG criteria). In the cytopenia-focused cohort, grade ≥ 3 cytopenia was present in 64.7% at day 30 and 40.4% at day 90. Grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia was present at day 90/month 3 in 20.8–27.7% across ide-cel-only hematotoxicity studies. Conclusions: Real-world ide-cel data identify EMD as a high-risk phenotype associated with inferior response durability and approximately halved median PFS. Prolonged grade ≥ 3 cytopenias are common after standard-of-care ide-cel, particularly thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. These findings support pre-infusion risk stratification incorporating true EMD status, marrow disease burden, and hematopoietic reserve.