Background and Objectives: Intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD) is a common cause of symptomatic axial low back pain. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is currently the standard for the investigation and diagnosis of IDD. Deep learning artificial intelligence models represent a potential tool for rapidly and automatically detecting and visualizing IDD. This study investigated the use of deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for the detection, classification, and grading of IDD. Methods: Sagittal images of 1000 IDD T2-weighted MRI images from 515 adult patients with symptomatic low back pain were separated into 800 MRI images using annotation techniques to create a training dataset (80%) and 200 MRI images to create a test dataset (20%). The training dataset was cleaned, labeled, and annotated by a radiologist. All lumbar discs were classified for disc degeneration based on the Pfirrmann grading system. The deep learning CNN model was used for training in detecting and grading IDD. The results of the training with the CNN model were verified by testing the grading of the dataset using an automatic model. Results: The training dataset of the sagittal intervertebral disc lumbar MRI images found 220 IDDs of grade I, 530 of grade II, 170 of grade III, 160 of grade IV, and 20 of grade V. The deep CNN model was able to detect and classify lumbar IDD with an accuracy of more than 95%. Conclusion: The deep CNN model can reliably automatically grade routine T2-weighted MRIs using the Pfirrmann grading system, providing a quick and efficient method for lumbar IDD classification.

Study Design: Systematic review. Objectives: Lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD) poses a significant global health care challenge, with accurate diagnosis being difficult using conventional methods. Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning and deep learning, offers promising tools for improving diagnostic accuracy and workflow in lumbar DDD. This study aims to review AI-assisted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diagnosis in lumbar DDD and discuss current research for clinical use. Methods: A systematic search of electronic databases identified studies on AI applications in MRI-based lumbar DDD diagnosis, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Search terms included combinations of “Artificial Intelligence,” “Machine Learning,” “Deep Learning,” “Low Back Pain,” “Lumbar,” “Disc,” “Degeneration,” and “MRI,” targeting studies in English from January 1, 2010, to January 1, 2024. Inclusion criteria encompassed experimental and observational studies in peer-reviewed journals. Data extraction focused on study characteristics, AI techniques, performance metrics, and diagnostic outcomes, with quality assessed using predefined criteria. Results: Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria, employing various AI methodologies, including machine learning and deep learning, to diagnose lumbar DDD manifestations such as disc degeneration, herniation, and bulging. AI models consistently outperformed conventional methods in accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, with performance metrics ranging from 71.5% to 99% across different diagnostic objectives. Conclusion: The algorithm model provides a structured framework for integrating AI into routine clinical practice, enhancing diagnostic precision and patient outcomes in lumbar DDD management. Further research and validation are needed to refine AI algorithms for real-world application in lumbar DDD diagnosis.

This systematic review summarizes existing evidence and outlines the benefits of artificial intelligence-assisted spine surgery. The popularity of artificial intelligence has grown significantly, demonstrating its benefits in computer-assisted surgery and advancements in spinal treatment. This study adhered to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses), a set of reporting guidelines specifically designed for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The search strategy used Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms, including “MeSH (Artificial intelligence),” “Spine” AND “Spinal” filters, in the last 10 years, and English— from January 1, 2013, to October 31, 2023. In total, 442 articles fulfilled the first screening criteria. A detailed analysis of those articles identified 220 that matched the criteria, of which 11 were considered appropriate for this analysis after applying the complete inclusion and exclusion criteria. In total, 11 studies met the eligibility criteria. Analysis of these studies revealed the types of artificial intelligence-assisted spine surgery. No evidence suggests the superiority of assisted spine surgery with or without artificial intelligence in terms of outcomes. In terms of feasibility, accuracy, safety, and facilitating lower patient radiation exposure compared with standard fluoroscopic guidance, artificial intelligence-assisted spine surgery produced satisfactory and superior outcomes. The incorporation of artificial intelligence with augmented and virtual reality appears promising, with the potential to enhance surgeon proficiency and overall surgical safety.

Objective: To develop and evaluate a technique using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for the computer-assisted diagnosis of cervical spine fractures from radiographic x-ray images. By leveraging deep learning techniques, the study might potentially lead to improved patient outcomes and clinical decision-making.Methods: This study obtained 500 lateral radiographic cervical spine x-ray images from standard open-source dataset repositories to develop a classification model using CNNs. All the images contained diagnostic information, including normal cervical radiographic images (n=250) and fracture images of the cervical spine fracture (n=250). The model would classify whether the patient had a cervical spine fracture or not. Seventy percent of the images were training data sets used for model training, and 30% were for testing. Konstanz Information Miner (KNIME)’s graphic user interface-based programming enabled class label annotation, data preprocessing, CNNs model training, and performance evaluation.Results: The performance evaluation of a model for detecting cervical spine fractures presents compelling results across various metrics. This model exhibits high sensitivity (recall) values of 0.886 for fractures and 0.957 for normal cases, indicating its proficiency in identifying true positives. Precision values of 0.954 for fractures and 0.893 for normal cases highlight the model’s ability to minimize false positives. With specificity values of 0.957 for fractures and 0.886 for normal cases, the model effectively identifies true negatives. The overall accuracy of 92.14% highlights its reliability in correctly classifying cases by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.Conclusion: We successfully used deep learning models for computer-assisted diagnosis of cervical spine fractures from radiographic x-ray images. This approach can assist the radiologist in screening, detecting, and diagnosing cervical spine fractures.

Study Design: Systematic review. Objective: Artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning (DL) models have recently emerged as tools to improve fracture detection, mainly through imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT) and radiographs. This systematic review evaluates the diagnostic performance of AI and DL models in detecting cervical spine fractures and assesses their potential role in clinical practice. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed/Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted for studies published between January 2000 and July 2024. Studies that evaluated AI models for cervical spine fracture detection were included. Diagnostic performance metrics were extracted and included sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve. The PROBAST tool assessed bias, and PRISMA criteria were used for study selection and reporting. Results: Eleven studies published between 2021 and 2024 were included in the review. AI models demonstrated variable performance, with sensitivity ranging from 54.9% to 100% and specificity from 72% to 98.6%. Models applied to CT imaging generally outperformed those applied to radiographs, with convolutional neural networks (CNN) and advanced architectures such as MobileNetV2 and Vision Transformer (ViT) achieving the highest accuracy. However, most studies lacked external validation, raising concerns about the generalizability of their findings. Conclusions: AI and DL models show significant potential in improving fracture detection, particularly in CT imaging. While these models offer high diagnostic accuracy, further validation and refinement are necessary before they can be widely integrated into clinical practice. AI should complement, rather than replace, human expertise in diagnostic workflows.

Background: Intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD) is a primary cause of chronic back pain and disability, highlighting the need for precise detection and grading for effective treatment. This study focuses on developing and validating a convolutional neural network (CNN) with a You Only Look Once (YOLO) architecture model using the Pfirrmann grading system to classify and grade lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans.Methods: We developed a deep learning model trained on a dataset of anonymized MRI studies of patients with symptomatic back pain. MRI images were segmented and annotated by radiologists according to the Pfirrmann grading for the datasets. The segmentation MRI-disc image dataset was prepared for three groups: a training set (1,000), a testing set (500), and an external validation set (500) to assess model generalizability without overlapping images. The model's performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, prediction error, and ROC-AUC.Results: The AI model showed high performance across all metrics. For Grade I IDD, the model achieved an accuracy of 97%, 95%, and 92% in the training, testing, and external validation sets, respectively. For Grade II, the sensitivity was 100% in both training and testing sets and 98% in the validation set. For Grade III, the specificity was 95.4% in the training set and 94% in both testing and validation sets. For Grade IV, the F1 score was 97.77% in the training set and 95% in both testing and validation sets. For Grade V, the prediction error was 2.3%, 2%, and 2.5% in the training, testing, and validation sets, respectively. The overall ROC-AUC was 97%, 92%, and 95% in the training, testing, and validation sets, respectively.Conclusions: The AI-based classification model exhibits high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in detecting and grading lumbar IDD using the Pfirrmann grading. AI has significantly enhanced diagnostic precision and reliability, providing a powerful tool for clinicians in managing IDD. The potential impact is substantial, although further clinical validation is necessary before integrating this model into routine practice.