Despite being the largest active collisional orogen on Earth, the growth mechanism of the Himalaya remains uncertain. Current debate has focused on the role of dynamic inter action between tectonics and climate and mass exchanges between the Himalayan and Tibetan crust during Cenozoic India-Asia collision. A major uncertainty in the debate comes from the lack of geologic information on the eastern segment of the Himalayas from 91°E to 97°E, which makes up about one-quarter of the mountain belt. To address this issue, we conducted detailed field mapping, U-Pb zircon age dating, and 40Ar/39Ar thermo chronology along two geologic traverses at longitudes of 92°E and 94°E across the eastern Himalaya. Our dating indicates the region experienced magmatic events at 1745-1760 Ma, 825-878 Ma, 480-520 Ma, and 28-20 Ma. The first three events also occurred in the northeastern Indian craton, while the last is unique to the Hima laya. Correlation of magmatic events and age-equivalent lithologic units suggests that the eastern segment of the Himalaya was constructed in situ by basement-involved thrusting, which is inconsistent with the hypothesis of high-grade Himalaya rocks derived from Tibet via channel flow. The Main Central thrust in the eastern Himalaya forms the roof of a major thrust duplex; its northern part was initiated at ca. 13 Ma, while the southern part was initiated at ca. 10 Ma, as indicated by 40Ar/39Ar thermochronom etry. Crustal thickening of the Main Central thrust hanging wall was expressed by discrete ductile thrusting between 12 Ma and 7 Ma, overlapping in time with motion on the Main Central thrust below. Restoration of two possible geologic cross sections from one of our geologic traverses, where one assumes the existence of pre-Cenozoic deformation below the Himalaya and the other assumes flat-lying strata prior to the India-Asia collision, leads to estimated shortening of 775 km (~76% strain) and 515 km (~70% strain), respectively. We favor the presence of significant basement topog raphy below the eastern Himalaya based on projections of early Paleo zoic structures from the Shillong Plateau (i.e., the Central Shillong thrust) located ~50 km south of our study area. Since northeastern India and possibly the eastern Himalaya both experienced early Paleozoic contraction, the estimated shortening from this study may have resulted from a combined effect of early Paleozoic and Cenozoic deformation. © 2009 Geological Society of America.Link_to_subscribed_fulltex

The Himalayan orogen has experienced intense Cenozoic deformation and widespread metamorphism, making it diffi cult to track its initial architecture and the subsequent deformation path during the Cenozoic India-Asia collision. To address this issue, we conducted structural mapping and U-Pb zircon geochronology across the Shillong Plateau, Mikir Hills, and Brahmaputra River Valley of northeastern India, located 30-100 km south of the eastern Himalaya. Our work reveals three episodes of igneous activity at ca. 1600 Ma, ca. 1100 Ma, and ca. 500 Ma, and three ductile-deformation events at ca. 1100 Ma, 520-500 Ma, and during the Cretaceous. The first two events were contractional, possibly induced by assembly of Rodinia and Eastern Gondwana, while the last event was extensional, possibly related to breakup of Gondwana. Because of its prox imity to the Himalaya, the occurrence of 500 Ma contractional deformation in northeastern India implies that any attempt to determine the magnitude of Cenozoic deformation across the Himalayan orogen using Proterozoic strata as marker beds must first remove the effect of early Paleozoic deformation. The lithostratigraphy of the Shillong Plateau established by this study and its correlation to the Himalayan units imply that the Greater Himalayan Crystalline Complex may be a tectonic mixture of Indian crystalline basement, its Proterozoic-Cambrian cover sequence and an early Paleozoic arc. Although the Shillong Plateau may be regarded as a rigid block in the Cenozoic, our work demonstrates that distributed active left-slip faulting dominates its interior, consistent with earthquake focal mechanisms and global positioning system velocity fields across the region. © 2010 Geological Society of America.Link_to_subscribed_fulltex