Most renal masses incidentally detected by cross-sectional images are benign, being mainly cysts, and if they are malignant, they are indolent in nature with limited metastatic potential. Enhanced renal masses less than 4 cm in size are known as small renal masses (SRMs), and their growth rate (GR) and the possibility of developing metastasis are extremely low. Delayed intervention of SRMs by closed and routine imaging follow-up known as active surveillance (AS) is now an option according to urological guidelines. Radiologists have a key position in AS management of SRMs even unifocal and multifocal (sporadic or associated with genetic syndromes) and also in the follow-up of complex renal cysts by Bosniak cyst classification system. Radiologists play a key role in the AS of both unifocal and multifocal (sporadic or associated with genetic syndromes) SRMs as well as in the follow-up of complex renal cysts using the Bosniak cyst classification system. Indeed, radiologists must determine which patients with SRMs or complex renal cysts can be included in AS, establish the follow-up radiological test algorithm to be used in different scenarios, perform measurements in follow-up tests, and decide when AS should be discontinued. The purpose of this article is to review the indications and management of AS in SRMs, especially focused on specific scenarios, such as complex renal cysts and multifocal renal tumors (sporadic or hereditary). In this work, the authors aimed to provide a thorough review of imaging in the context of active surveillance of renal masses.

Renal transplant is the first-line treatment of end-stage renal disease. The increasing number of transplants performed every year has led to a larger population of transplant patients. Complications may arise during the perioperative and postoperative periods, and imaging plays a key role in this scenario. Contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) is a safe tool that adds additional value to US. Contrast agents are usually administered intravenously, but urinary tract anatomy and complications such as stenosis or leak can be studied using intracavitary administration of contrast agents. Assessment of the graft and iliac vessels with CEUS is particularly helpful in identifying vascular and parenchymal complications, such as arterial or venous thrombosis and stenosis, acute tubular injury, or cortical necrosis, which can lead to graft loss. Furthermore, infectious and malignant graft involvement can be accurately studied with CEUS, which can help in detection of renal abscesses and in the differentiation between benign and malignant disease. CEUS is also useful in interventional procedures, helping to guide percutaneous aspiration of collections with better delimitation of the graft boundaries and to guide renal graft biopsies by avoiding avascular areas. Potential postprocedural vascular complications, such as pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, or active bleeding, are identified with CEUS. In addition, newer quantification tools such as CEUS perfusion are promising, but further studies are needed to approve its use for clinical purposes. ^©RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Objectives: We aimed to compare Bosniak III and IV cystic renal masses (CRM) using Bosniak classification version 2005 (BC-v2005) versus BC-v2019 and analyze radiological findings and patterns of benignity and malignancy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all Bosniak III-IV CRMs using BC-v2005 at our center with four-phase CT confirmed pathology, between January 2014 and June 2019. Two radiologists independently re-evaluated each lesion using both BCs, including findings of benignity and malignancy. Bosniak III-IV CRMs were classified in four radiological patterns: inflammatory (CRM-IP), cystic nephroma (CRM-CNP), papillary (CRM-PP), and clear cell (CRM-CCP). Characteristics of patterns were compared. Results: Out of 97 patients, 57 Bosniak III-IV CRMs met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-four (42.10%) lesions were reclassified as solid tumours using BC-v2019. Any lesion was downgraded to IIF or lower. Nine (15.78%) lesions were upgraded to Bosniak III-IV CRMs by BC-v2019, despite benign lesions. The presence of acute-angle nodules was the only statistically significant sign of malignancy ( p < 0.01). All benign lesions, not considered solid, were included in the two patterns of benignity, characterized by thickened septa and/or wall and without acute-angle nodules. All malignant CRMs presented two patterns of malignancy, proposed as acute-angle nodules. All clear cell carcinomas presented with hyperenhancing acute-angle nodules in the arterial phase. Pattern classification was better for BC-v2005 and BC-v2029, differentiating benign and malignant CRM. Conclusion: The proposed four radiological patterns improved performance than BC-v2019 in classifying benign lesions (CRM-IP and CRM-CNP) and malignant ones (CRM-PP and CRM-CCP), with wall and septa thickening and acute-angle nodules as relevant biomarkers.

Objectives: The aim of the study was to assess the utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), using both qualitative and quantitative perfusion analysis, in differentiating subtypes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Methods: This prospective, single-center study includes 91 patients with histologically confirmed RCC. We performed a CEUS within one week prior to nephrectomy. Qualitative parameters (enhancement pattern, heterogeneity, pseudocapsule) and quantitative perfusion metrics were assessed. Logistic regression models were developed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of CEUS in differentiating high-grade (clear cell RCC) from low-grade RCC (papillary and chromophobe). Results: Qualitative CEUS findings showed that hyperenhancement and isoenhancement were significantly associated with high-grade RCC (OR = 38.3 and OR = 7.8, respectively; p < 0.001 and p = 0.014). Hypoenhancement was predominant in low-grade RCC (80.0%). Quantitative parameters, including peak enhancement and wash-in/wash-out area under the curve, significantly differed between tumor grades (p < 0.001). A model using qualitative parameters alone achieved an AUC of 0.847 and 81.9% accuracy. Adding quantitative metrics marginally improved performance (AUC 0.912, accuracy 86.2%), though not significantly. Conclusions: CEUS provides valuable diagnostic information in differentiating RCC subtypes, with qualitative parameters alone demonstrating strong predictive power. While quantitative analysis slightly enhances diagnostic accuracy, its added value may be limited by technical challenges.

Background: Mixed epithelial stromal tumour (MEST) is a rare biphasic neoplasm, most commonly arising in the kidney. Seminal vesicle involvement is exceedingly uncommon, and its clinical and imaging characteristics remain poorly defined. We present a rare case with detailed clinical and urological evaluation, multiparametric MRI characterisation, and radiologic-pathologic correlation. Case presentation: A 34-year-old man presented with recurrent acute urinary retention requiring repeated catheterization and, subsequently, an indwelling urinary catheter. Urological evaluation, including ultrasonography and cystoscopy, demonstrated marked mass effect on the bladder and prostatic urethra without an intravesical lesion. Contrast-enhanced CT and MRI revealed a large retrovesical mass arising from the right seminal vesicle, measuring approximately 11.5 × 9 × 10.5 cm. MRI demonstrated a predominantly multiloculated cystic lesion containing haemorrhagic or proteinaceous material, with an enhancing papillary solid component showing mild diffusion restriction and progressive enhancement. The lesion produced marked mass effect on the bladder, prostate, and rectum, without local invasion. Robotic-assisted resection of the right seminal vesicle was performed. Histopathology demonstrated a biphasic epithelial and stromal proliferation without atypia, necrosis, or increased mitotic activity, consistent with MEST. Conclusions: This case highlights the value of integrating clinical, urological, radiological, and pathological findings in the evaluation of a large complex retrovesical mass. Multiparametric MRI provided detailed characterisation of the solid-cystic architecture, with imaging features correlating with the epithelial and stromal components identified histologically. Recognition of this pattern may raise suspicion for MEST and help guide differential diagnosis and surgical planning, although definitive diagnosis requires histopathological and immunohistochemical evaluation.