Carolina Buriani

Dr. Carolina Buriani

Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, UO anatomia Patologica, Ferrara, Emilia-Romagna, Italy

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 December 2024 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ACAngela Chiereghin
Angela Chiereghin
LPLorenzo Pizzi
Lorenzo Pizzi
CBCarolina Buriani
Carolina Buriani
TSTiziana Sanna
Tiziana Sanna
AAAndrea Amico
Andrea Amico
FMFrancesca Mezzetti
Francesca Mezzetti
Background/Objectives: Self-sampling is recognized as a viable alternative to clinician-sampling for HPV primary screening. This study aimed to assess, within an Italian organized cervical cancer screening program, the acceptance and ease of use of self-sampling and the adherence to follow-up. The prevalences of HPV infection, cervical dysplasia, and cancer were contextually evaluated. Methods: Electronic records of 19,327 women, 30–64 years-old, residing within the Bologna Local Health Authority territory, who were offered self-sampling as an alternative to clinician-sampling, were retrospectively reviewed. They had never or irregularly attended and were overdue for a screening invitation due to the COVID-19 pandemic. An opt-in approach was adopted, involving local pharmacies for kit delivery and sample collection. Initially, HPV-positive results led to direct referral to colposcopy; later, cytological triage on clinician-samples was provided. Results: Self-sampling reached over twice as many women (11.5%) compared to historical clinician-sampling alone (<5%), showing high acceptance. Additionally, a high screening completion level was observed, with 79.5% of self-samples returned to pharmacies. A low percentage of self-samples resulted in inadequate results (1.1%), suggesting the method’s ease of use. HPV-positivity was 13.1%, higher than the 9.9% recorded in the ordinary screening population in 2019 (p < 0.001), the last year before the pandemic. Compliance to both immediate colposcopy and cytology triage exceeded 90% (p = 0.675). The rate of cervical adenocarcinoma was twice as high as in the routinely screened population in 2019 (0.9‰ versus 0.4‰). Finally, 6% of women opted for clinician appointments. Conclusions: Self-sampling proved to be an easy-to-use and effective tool for reaching non-attenders, who are at high risk of cancer. Cytology triage on clinician-samples did not negatively impact follow-up adherence. It seems appropriate to maintain a clinician-collection option even among non-attenders.

9 September 2026 in Preprints.org
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
GPGiampaolo Pompeo
Giampaolo Pompeo
AMAlessandra Mongia
Alessandra Mongia
IPIrene Paganini
Irene Paganini
Giuseppe GoriniGiuseppe Gorini
Giuseppe Gorini
DPDonella Puliti
Donella Puliti
SGSilvia Gori
Silvia Gori
Background: Under the current Italian HPV-based cervical screening protocol, women with persistent high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) positivity at the 12-month recall are referred to colposcopy regardless of cytology results. Although this strategy maximizes lesion detection, it may generate substantial over-referral. We evaluated whether partial HPV genotyping combined with cytology can improve risk stratification in women with persistent HPV positivity at the 12-month recall. Methods: A multicenter retrospective analysis of cervical screening data collected from four Italian screening programs (Florence, Padua, Umbria and Emilia-Romagna) was performed. Among the 270,714 women screened between 2015 and 2019, 4,589 women with persistent HR-HPV positivity at 12-month recall after baseline HPV-positive/NILM results were included. Four alternative triage strategies based on cytology and HPV 16/18 genotyping were retrospectively simulated and compared with the current protocol. Outcomes included CIN2+ detection, relative sensitivity for CIN2+ and CIN3+, positive predictive value (PPV) and reduction in colposcopy referrals. Results: Under the current protocol, 4,589 colposcopies identified 327 CIN2+ lesions, including 113 CIN3+ lesions, yielding a PPV for CIN2+ of 7.1%. Overall, 36.7% of CIN2+ lesions were associated with NILM cytology at recall. HPV 16/18 genotyping identified 43.3% of these cytologically occult lesions. Among the evaluated strategies, referral of HPV 16/18-positive women regardless of cytology and referral of women with low-grade or worse cytology regardless of genotype achieved the most favorable balance between sensitivity and efficiency. This approach reduced colposcopy referrals by 57.7%, nearly doubled the PPV for CIN2+ to 13.4% and maintained relative sensitivities of 79.2% for CIN2+ and 85.0% for CIN3+. Conclusions: Combining partial HPV genotyping with cytology substantially improves risk stratification in women with persistent HR-HPV positivity at 12-month recall. A risk-based approach may markedly reduce unnecessary colposcopies while maintaining acceptable sensitivity for high-grade cervical lesions. These findings support the integration of molecular and cytological information into 12-month recall management strategies within HPV-based cervical screening programs.