Background Patients with pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC) may benefit from aggressive surgical therapy. The objective of this study was to determine the role of major anatomic resection for pulmonary metastasectomy to improve survival when compared with limited pulmonary resection. Patients and methods Data of 522 patients (64.2% men, mean age 64.5 years) who underwent pulmonary resections with curative intent for CRC metastases over a 2-year period were reviewed. All patients were followed for a minimum of 3 years. Disease-specific survival (DSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were assessed with the Kaplan–Meier method. Factors associated with DSS and DFS were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Results A total of 394 (75.6%) patients underwent wedge resection, 19 (3.6%) anatomic segmentectomy, 5 (0.9%) lesser resections not described, 100 (19.3%) lobectomy, and 4 (0.8%) pneumonectomy. Accordingly, 104 (19.9%) patients were treated with major anatomic resection and 418 (80.1%) with lesser resection. Operations were carried out with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in 93 patients. The overall DSS and DFS were 55 and 28.3 months, respectively. Significant differences in DSS and DFS in favor of major resection versus lesser resection (DSS median not reached versus 52.2 months, P = 0.03; DFS median not reached versus 23.9 months, P < 0.001) were found. In the multivariate analysis, major resection appeared to be a protective factor in DSS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41–0.96, P = 0.031] and DFS (HR 0.5, 95% CI 0.36–0.75, P < 0.001). The surgical approach (VATS versus open surgical resection) had no effect on outcome. Conclusion Major anatomic resection with lymphadenectomy for pulmonary metastasectomy can be considered in selected CRC patient with sufficient functional reserve to improve the DSS and DFS. Further prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm the present results.

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in lung metastasectomy—what is new in lung metastasectomy: an over-view

OBJECTIVES: Unplanned readmission is defined as the return to inpatient hospitalization within 30 days after discharge. Worldwide, its incidence after lung resection ranges between 8% and 50%, and it has been shown to impact both patient recovery and healthcare resources. Our goal was to identify the risk factors to prioritize early follow-ups. METHODS: We analysed data from the database of the Grupo Español de Cirugía Torácica Video-Asistida from 33 thoracic surgery departments over 15 months. Standard tests were used to compare the different risk groups. Our goal was to present the most relevant explanatory variables for readmission. RESULTS: A total of 174 of 2808 patients (6%) underwent unplanned readmission after a lobectomy. Of all the preoperative individual characteristics, only lung function was found to be a risk factor for readmission [forced expiratory volume in 1 s < 80%, risk ratio (RR) 1.78, P < 0.001; diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide <60%, RR 1.6, P = 0.02; and VO2 < 20 ml/kg/min, RR 1.59, P = 0.02]. The tumour’s characteristics and the stage of the disease did not have an influence on the readmission rates. In the readmitted cohort, an open approach or thoracotomy was associated with more frequent readmissions (RR 1.77; P < 0.001). Strong adhesions (RR 1.81; P < 0.001) or adhesions occupying more than half of the hemithorax (RR 1.73, P < 0.001) were also found to be risk factors for readmission and for longer operative times. A length of stay of >10 days after a lobectomy was found to be a risk factor for readmission (RR 1.9). CONCLUSIONS: We identified preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for readmission. This information can be a useful tool to help with the prioritization of early follow-ups, especially in centres with high workloads.