Tingli Hao

Dr. Tingli Hao


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 August 2024 in Plants
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XZXiaojian Zeng
Xiaojian Zeng
XCXiaolei Cao
Xiaolei Cao
QZQiuyue Zhao
Qiuyue Zhao
SHSiyuan Hou
Siyuan Hou
XHXin Hu
Xin Hu
ZYZhaoqun Yao
Zhaoqun Yao
The efficient protoplast transient transformation system in plants is an important tool to study gene expression, metabolic pathways, and various mutagenic parameters, but it has not been established in Phelipanche aegyptiaca. As a root parasitic weed that endangers the growth of 29 species of plants in 12 families around the world, there is still no good control method for P. aegyptiaca. Even the parasitic mechanisms of P. aegyptiaca and the related genes regulating parasitism are not yet understood. In this study, by comparing the factors related to protoplast isolation and transfection, we developed the optimal protocol for protoplast isolation and transfection in Phelipanche aegyptiaca haustorium. The optimal protoplast yield and activity were 6.2 × 106 protoplasts/g fresh weight [FW] and 87.85%, respectively, by using 0.5 mol/L mannitol, enzyme concentrations of 2.5% cellulase R-10 and 0.8% Macerozyme R-10 at 24 °C for 4 h. At the same time, transfection efficiency of protoplasts was up to 78.49% when using 30 μg plasmid, 40% polyethylene glycol (PEG) concentration, 24 °C incubation temperature, and 20 min transfection time. This is the first efficient protoplasts’ isolation and transient transformation system of Phelipanche aegyptiaca haustorium, laying a foundation for future studies on the gene function and mechanisms of haustorium formation in parasitic plants.

1 October 2023 in Plant Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XCXiaolei Cao
Xiaolei Cao
SZSifeng Zhao
Sifeng Zhao
LZL. Zhang
L. Zhang
THTingli Hao
Tingli Hao
QMQianqian Ma
Qianqian Ma
ZYZhaoqun Yao
Zhaoqun Yao
Coleus (Plectranthus scutellarioides [L.] R.Br., [syn.: Solenostemon scutellarioides], Lamiaceae) is a popular ornamental plant for its colorful and showy foliage, and widely planted as a garden pl...

29 October 2026 in Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SLSaisai Liu
Saisai Liu
向麻向阳 麻
向阳 麻
SLShihao Liu
Shihao Liu
李建李 建朝
李 建朝
SZShuhao Zhang
Shuhao Zhang
THTongyu Hou
Tongyu Hou
Ill-timed harvest-aid spraying can reduce cotton yield and fiber quality. However, determining optimal spraying times is challenging when air temperature fluctuates strongly. Here, we analyzed whether cultivar type and planting pattern alleviate the adverse effects of improper spraying time. We conducted a three-factor field experiment in Xinjiang, China, during 2024–2025 with two cotton cultivars, three planting patterns (H76, H66, and L76), and three spraying times (T1, T2, and T3), plus an untreated control, then compared the defoliation rate (DR), boll opening rate (BOR), yield, and fiber quality among groups. We also determined the net contributions of harvest aids to DR and BOR by subtracting the natural (control) values (NDR and NBOR, respectively). Spraying time significantly affected DR, BOR, yield, and fiber quality. DR and BOR were highest at T2; lower values at T1 and T3 were attributed to physiological immaturity and lower temperatures, respectively. Yield losses and reductions in fiber length and strength of upper-canopy bolls increased with earlier spraying. Across the T1–T2 and T2–T3 intervals, the mean seed cotton yield loss decreased from 15.18% to 8.15%, and its average daily rate of change decreased from 0.95% to 0.36%. In contrast, the mean fiber length loss decreased from 8.44% to 3.81%, whereas its average daily rate of change increased from 0.36% to 0.53%. The moderating effects of cultivar on DR, BOR, and yield losses were susceptible to external environmental factors. Conversely, planting pattern had no significant effect on fiber length and fiber strength losses but had significant independent main effects on DR, BOR, and yield losses by altering NDR and NBOR: NDR and NBOR generally decreased in the order L76 > H66 > H76, whereas yield losses increased in the order L76 < H66 < H76. Therefore, when optimal spraying time is difficult to determine, we recommend reducing plant density or optimizing row configuration, rather than changing cultivar, to improve the efficacy of harvest aids.