Babies to women eligible for trial of labor after a cesarean (TOLAC) are sometimes delivered by cesarean section (CS). To obtain clinicians’ attitudes and beliefs about TOLAC, this study was designed to investigate the views of clinicians when advising TOLAC-eligible pregnant women about TOLAC, and to explore their reasons in favor of or against TOLAC. Interviews were carried out individually (face-to-face) with clinicians using a specially designed questionnaire to collect data from obstetricians in the Western Region of Saudi. Regression analysis was used as appropriate. Among the 183 obstetricians included in the current study, approximately 79.2% were against offering TOLAC. However, most of the physicians (89.1%) were in favor of offering TOLAC to patients who had had a successful vaginal birth after CS. significant associations were found between physicians’ opposition to TOLAC and medical and most non-medical factors. Clinicians should recognize that the critical role they play in the delivery decision-making process and in boosting women’s confidence in TOLAC may be key to increasing the rate of TOLAC.

Background/Objectives: Type 2 myocardial infarction (T2MI) results from a myocardial oxygen supply–demand imbalance without acute coronary atherothrombosis, and the role of invasive coronary angiography in its management is undefined. Prior literature has largely compared T2MI to type 1 myocardial infarction (T1MI) rather than examining angiography selection within T2MI itself. This systematic review with narrative synthesis identified and synthesized factors associated with angiography utilization among T2MI patients, distinguishing adjusted from unadjusted evidence. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for studies reporting patient or clinical characteristics associated with undergoing invasive coronary angiography among patients with T2MI, identified via multivariable regression, univariate comparison, or stratified baseline tables. Studies using angiography as an inclusion criterion, an event-risk outcome, or a randomized treatment assignment, or comparing T2MI to T1MI as groups without addressing within-T2MI factors, were excluded. This review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidance. Given clinical and methodological heterogeneity and no common effect-size metric across studies, findings were synthesized narratively without quantitative pooling. Results: Three studies met inclusion criteria (two large US administrative-data cohorts, n = 268,850 and n = 18,606 T2MI; one French two-center cohort, n = 224). Younger age was independently associated with greater odds of angiography in the largest cohort reporting age-specific estimates, with a monotonic decline in angiography utilization across advancing age strata; a second cohort’s unadjusted group comparison was directionally concordant, but its own multivariable estimate for age was internally inconsistent and is not treated as confirmatory. Chronic ischemic heart disease and heart failure were independently associated with higher odds of angiography, while chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peripheral vascular disease, and atrial fibrillation were independently associated with lower odds. Commercial insurance and Midwest or South United States residence were independently associated with higher odds in the single study assessing these factors. Cardiology consultation showed conflicting directions of adjusted association between the two studies reporting it. Conclusions: Selection for invasive angiography in T2MI is heterogeneous and inconsistently studied. Age was the only factor with cross-study directional support, and even that lacked confirmed adjusted concordance. Other factors were supported by single studies or conflicting findings, and no included study reported the bedside clinical variables plausibly driving real-time decisions. Certainty was very low for every factor examined (modified GRADE), underscoring the need for prospective study of angiography selection in T2MI.

Background: Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TTC), or stress-induced cardiomyopathy, is characterized by transient left ventricular dysfunction often triggered by emotional or physical stress. Although classically associated with postmenopausal women under psychological stress, cases among endurance athletes, particularly marathon runners, have emerged, suggesting a unique pathophysiological link between extreme exercise, catecholamine surge, and microvascular dysfunction.Objective: This review synthesizes published cases and mechanistic studies of TTC occurring in endurance athletes, emphasizing marathon-related presentations, diagnostic challenges, and clinical implications.Methods: A structured literature review of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science identified case reports and series meeting predefined diagnostic and methodological criteria. Dual extraction, quality appraisal, and PRISMA-guided selection were performed.Results: A total of 42 documented cases were analyzed. The majority occurred in middle-aged athletes, predominantly female, with acute chest pain or dyspnea immediately after race completion. Troponin elevations were modest, and coronary angiography was negative for obstructive lesions. Echocardiography and cardiac MRI typically demonstrated apical or mid-ventricular ballooning with rapid recovery. Mechanistic data support transient catecholamine-mediated myocardial stunning and microvascular dysfunction as central features.Conclusion: TTC in endurance athletes represents a distinct clinical entity within the spectrum of stress cardiomyopathies. Recognition of this condition is crucial in differentiating it from acute coronary syndromes and preventing recurrence through risk modification and psychological or autonomic management.

A left ventricular diverticulum at the apex is a rare cardiac anomaly in adults, often detected incidentally due to its asymptomatic nature. Noninvasive imaging modalities, such as echocardiography, provide initial diagnostic clues, but advanced techniques like cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging or contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) are often required for confirmation. This report describes a case of a patient presenting with recurrent chest pain, ultimately diagnosed with a left ventricular apical diverticulum through a stepwise imaging approach.