La locomoción bípeda en robots humanoides actuados asegura la estabilidad mediante criterios como el punto de momento cero (ZMP), pero a costa de altos consumos energéticos y marchas poco naturales. En contraste, el caminado dinámico pasivo aprovecha la gravedad y la inercia para generar ciclos límite autoestables con mínima energía, reproduciendo patrones más cercanos a los humanos. Este trabajo presenta el diseño y validación de un robot bípedo pasivo bidimensional, desarrollado mediante modelado virtual en SolidWorks y construido con materiales ligeros e impresión 3D. El prototipo integra pies semicirculares, articulaciones de baja fricción y una distribución optimizada de masas para asegurar la estabilidad. Las pruebas experimentales, analizadas con el software de Kinovea, confirmaron la aparición de ciclos límite estables. Los resultados demuestran que un diseño simple puede lograr una locomoción estable únicamente con la dinámica natural, aportando una base para futuros desarrollos de robots bípedos energéticamente eficientes.

Bilateral robotic rehabilitation has emerged as a technological approach for promoting coordinated upper-limb training after stroke. This state-of-the-art review critically analyzes bilateral upper-limb rehabilitation robots with emphasis on mechanical architecture, actuation and transmission, bilateral interaction modalities, control strategies, assistance modes, and validation evidence. A structured literature search covering 2010 to 8 July 2026 identified 141 records; 23 technology-related publications were retained for the state-of-the-art analysis, comprising 18 primary bilateral robotic studies and 5 supporting technical/contextual publications. The reviewed systems were organized according to a hierarchical framework distinguishing end-effector, exoskeleton, and hybrid architectures from simultaneous bilateral, master–slave/mirror-based, and cooperative bimanual interaction modalities. The evidence indicates that end-effector systems favor mechanical simplicity and adaptable workspaces, whereas exoskeletons provide more direct joint-level control at the cost of greater alignment and mechanical complexity. Control approaches increasingly incorporate impedance, admittance, assist-as-needed, and bio-signal-based strategies to improve compliant interaction and adapt assistance to user contribution. However, many advanced systems remain supported primarily by engineering validation or experiments involving healthy participants, while direct post-stroke clinical validation is comparatively limited. Future development should therefore prioritize clinically validated adaptive assistance, control strategies capable of accommodating asymmetric bilateral contribution, and safe, usable, and affordable systems suitable for clinical and home-based rehabilitation.