Paolo Giannoni

Dr. Paolo Giannoni

Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

36Years (1991-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2007 in Biomaterials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RCRanieri Cancedda
Ranieri Cancedda
Paolo GiannoniPaolo Giannoni
Paolo Giannoni
MMMaddalena Mastrogiacomo
Maddalena Mastrogiacomo

1 March 2003 in Matrix Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RCRanieri Cancedda
Ranieri Cancedda
BDBeatrice Dozin
Beatrice Dozin
Paolo GiannoniPaolo Giannoni
Paolo Giannoni
RQRodolfo Quarto
Rodolfo Quarto

17 February 2012 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Silvia ScaglioneSilvia Scaglione
Silvia Scaglione
Paolo GiannoniPaolo Giannoni
Paolo Giannoni
PBPaolo Bianchini
Paolo Bianchini
MSMonica Sandri
Monica Sandri
RMRoberto Marotta
Roberto Marotta
RQRodolfo Quarto
Rodolfo Quarto
In modern biomaterial design the generation of an environment mimicking some of the extracellular matrix features is envisaged to support molecular cross-talk between cells and scaffolds during tissue formation/remodeling. In bone substitutes chemical biomimesis has been particularly exploited; conversely, the relevance of pre-determined scaffold architecture for regenerated bone outputs is still unclear. Thus we aimed to demonstrate that a different organization of collagen fibers within newly formed bone under unloading conditions can be generated by differently architectured scaffolds. An ordered and confined geometry of hydroxyapatite foams concentrated collagen fibers within the pores, and triggered their self-assembly in a cholesteric-banded pattern, resulting in compact lamellar bone. Conversely, when progenitor cells were loaded onto nanofibrous collagen-based sponges, new collagen fibers were distributed in a nematic phase, resulting mostly in woven isotropic bone. Thus specific biomaterial design relevantly contributes to properly drive collagen fibers assembly to target bone regeneration.

9 June 2008 in Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Paolo GiannoniPaolo Giannoni
Paolo Giannoni
MMM. Mastrogiacomo
M. Mastrogiacomo
MAM. Alini
M. Alini
SPS. G. Pearce
S. G. Pearce
ACA. Corsi
A. Corsi
RCR. Cancedda
R. Cancedda
Bone repair was addressed in a critical‐sized defect model in sheep, combining a ceramic biomaterial and mesenchymal progenitor cells. The defects in the tibial mid‐diaphysis were treated with autologous bone or with a silicon‐stabilized tricalcium phosphate biomaterial, implemented or not by the addition of expanded bone marrow stromal cells. An internal locking compression plate and an external fixator were applied for stabilization. Radiographies were taken during the 8 months follow‐up: the pixel grey levels of the lesion areas were determined to evaluate the repair process radiologically. Microradiography, histology and vascular density tests were performed. The autologous bone‐treated group performed best, as assessed radiologically, within 20–24 weeks after surgery. Very limited healing was detected in the other experimental group: a partial bone deposition occurred at the periphery of the bony stumps only in the cell‐seeded scaffolds. Interestingly, this effect ended within 20–24 weeks, as for the autologous bone, suggesting similar kinetics of the repair processes involved. Moreover, bone deposition was located where a significant reduction of the ceramic scaffold was detected. Faxitron microradiography and histology data confirmed these results. Vascular density analysis evidenced that cell‐seeded scaffolds supported an increased vascular ingrowth. Thus, the interactions with the proper microenvironment and the oxygen and nutrient supply in the inner part of the constructs seem fundamental to initiate scaffold substitution and to improve cell performance in tissue‐engineered approaches to bone repair. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

1 February 2010 in Tissue Engineering Part A
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Paolo GiannoniPaolo Giannoni
Paolo Giannoni
Silvia ScaglioneSilvia Scaglione
Silvia Scaglione
ADAntonio Daga
Antonio Daga
CICristina Ilengo
Cristina Ilengo
MCMichele Cilli
Michele Cilli
RQRodolfo Quarto
Rodolfo Quarto
In tissue-engineered applications bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) are combined with scaffolds to target bone regeneration; animal models have been devised and the cells' long-term engraftment has been widely studied. However, in regenerated bone, the cell number is severely reduced with respect to the initially seeded BMSCs. This reflects the natural low cellularity of bone but underlines the selectivity of the differentiation processes. In this respect, we evaluated the short-term survival of BMSCs, transduced with the luciferase gene, after implantation of cell-seeded scaffolds in a nude mouse model. Cell proliferation/survival was assessed by bioluminescence imaging: light production was decreased by 30% on the first day, reaching a 50% loss within 48 h. Less than 5% of the initial signal remained after 2 months in vivo. Apoptotic BMSCs were detected within the first 2 days of implantation. Interestingly, the initial frequency of clonogenic progenitors matched the percentage of in vivo surviving cells. Cytokines and inflammation may contribute to the apoptotic onset at the implant milieu. However, preculturing cells with tumor necrosis factor alpha enhanced survival, allowing detection of 8.1% of the seeded BMSCs 2 months after implantation. Thus culturing conditions may reduce the apoptotic overload of seeded osteoprogenitors, strengthening the constructs' osteogenic potential.

1 July 2005 in Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Paolo GiannoniPaolo Giannoni
Paolo Giannoni
Aldo PaganoAldo Pagano
Aldo Pagano
EME. Maggi
E. Maggi
RAR. Arbicò
R. Arbicò
NRN. Randazzo
N. Randazzo
BDB. Dozin
B. Dozin