Objectives: To compare the elicited exercise responses at ventilatory thresholds (VTs: VT1 and VT2) identified by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) with the guideline-directed exercise intensity domains; to propose equations to predict heart rate (HR) at VTs; and to compare the accuracy of prescription methods. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed with 972 maximal treadmill CPET on patients with CVD. First, VTs were identified and compared with guideline-directed exercise intensity domains. Second, multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to generate prediction equations for HR at VTs. Finally, the accuracy of prescription methods was assessed by the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). Results: Significant dispersions of individual responses were found for VTs, with the same relative intensity of exercise corresponding to different guideline-directed exercise intensity domains. A mathematical error inherent to methods based on percentages of peak effort was identified, which may help to explain the dispersions. Tailored multivariable equations yielded r² of 0.726 for VT1 and 0.901 for VT2. MAPE for the novel VT1 equation was 6.0%, lower than that for guideline-based prescription methods (9.5 to 23.8%). MAPE for the novel VT2 equation was 4.3%, lower than guideline-based methods (5.8%–19.3%). Conclusion: The guideline-based exercise intensity domains for cardiovascular rehabilitation revealed inconsistencies and heterogeneity, which limits the currently used methods. New multivariable equations for patients with CVD were developed and demonstrated better accuracy, indicating that this methodology may be a valid alternative when CPET is unavailable.

Aims: To develop and validate equations predicting heart rate (HR) at the first and second ventilatory thresholds (VTs) and an optimized range-adjusted prescription for patients with cardiometabolic disease (CMD). To compare their performance against guideline-based exercise intensity domains. Methods and results: Cross-sectional study involving 2868 CMD patients from nine countries. HR predictive equations for first and second VTs (VT1, VT2) were developed using multivariate linear regression with 975 cycle-ergometer cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPET). ‘Adjusted’ percentages of peak HR (%HRpeak) and HR reserve (%HRR) were derived from this group. External validation with 1893 CPET (cycle-ergometer or treadmill) assessed accuracy, agreement, and reliability against guideline-based %HRpeak and %HRR prescriptions using mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), Bland–Altman analyses, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). HR predictive equations (R²: 0.77 VT1, 0.88 VT2) and adjusted %HRR (VT1: 42%, VT2: 77%) were developed. External validation demonstrated superiority over widely used guideline-directed intensity domains for %HRpeak and %HRR. The new methods showed consistent performance across both VTs with lower MAPE (VT1: 7.1%, VT2: 5.0%), ‘good’ ICC for VT1 (0.81, 0.82) and ‘excellent’ for VT2 (0.93). Guideline-based exercise intensity domains had higher MAPE (VT1: 6.8–21.3%, VT2: 5.1–16.7%), ‘poor’ to ‘good’ ICC for VT1, and ‘poor’ to ‘excellent’ for VT2, indicating inconsistencies related to specific VTs across guidelines. Conclusion: Developed and validated HR predictive equations and the optimized %HRR for CMD patients for determining VT1 and VT2 outperformed the guideline-based exercise intensity domains and showed ergometer interchangeability. They offer a superior alternative for prescribing moderate intensity exercise when CPET is unavailable.

Resumo Fundamento A intolerância ao exercício pós-COVID-19 não é bem entendida. O teste de esforço cardiopulmonar (TECP) pode identificar as limitações ao exercício subjacentes. Objetivos Avaliar a etiologia e a magnitude da intolerância ao exercício em sujeitos pós-COVID-19. Métodos Estudo de coorte que avaliou sujeitos com níveis de gravidades diferentes da doença COVID-19 e um grupo de controle selecionado por pareamento por escores de propensão. Em uma amostra seleta com TECP anterior à infecção viral disponível, foram realizadas comparações antes [...] Resumo Fundamento A intolerância ao exercício pós-COVID-19 não é bem entendida. O teste de esforço cardiopulmonar (TECP) pode identificar as limitações ao exercício subjacentes. Objetivos Avaliar a etiologia e a magnitude da intolerância ao exercício em sujeitos pós-COVID-19. Métodos Estudo de coorte que avaliou sujeitos com níveis de gravidades diferentes da doença COVID-19 e um grupo de controle selecionado por pareamento por escores de propensão. Em uma amostra seleta com TECP anterior à infecção viral disponível, foram realizadas comparações antes

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to provide comprehensive reference values for oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES) in healthy adults. International heterogeneity was also explored through published databases. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with treadmill cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) from a Brazilian healthy adult sample, in which absolute OUES and values normalized by weight and body surface area (BSA) were calculated. Data were stratified by sex and age group. Prediction equations were calculated using age and anthropometric variables. International data were pooled and differences were explored using factorial analysis of variance or the t test, as appropriate. The OUES age-related patterns were calculated using regression analysis. Results: A total of 3544 CPX were included (1970 males and 1574 females) and the age ranged from 20-80 yr. Males had higher values than females for OUES, OUES/kg, and OUES/BSA. Lower values were found with aging and the data followed a quadratic regression curve. Reference value tables and predictive equations were provided for absolute and normalized OUES in both sexes. International comparisons of absolute OUES values among Brazilian, European, and Japanese data revealed substantial heterogeneity. The OUES/BSA measure minimized the discrepancies between Brazilian and European data. Conclusions: Our study provided comprehensive OUES reference values in a large healthy adult sample from South America with a wide age range and included absolute and normalized values. Differences observed between Brazilian and European data were reduced in the BSA-normalized OUES.

There is no definition for strain deformation values in relation to cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) in different heart failure (HF) phenotypes. To identify the relationship between echocardiographic systolic function measurements and CRF in HF patients. Systematic review and meta-analysis following the PRISMA recommendations. Studies reporting echocardiographic assessments of left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and direct measurement of peak oxygen uptake (VO_2peak) in HF patients with reduced or preserved LVEF (HFrEF, HFpEF) were included. The patients were divided into Weber classes according to VO_2peak. Twenty-five studies involving a total of 2,136 patients (70.5% with HFpEF) were included. Mean LVEF and LVGLS were similar in HFpEF patients in Weber Class A/B and Class C/D. In HFrEF patients, a non-significant difference was found in LVEF between Weber Class A/B (30.2% [95%CI: 29.6 to 30.9%]) and Class C/D (25.2% [95%CI: 20.5 to 29.9%]). In HFrEF patients, mean LVGLS was significantly lower in Class C/D compared to Class A/B (6.5% [95%CI: 6.0 to 7.1%] and 10.3% [95%CI: 9.0 to 11.5%], respectively). The correlation between VO_2peak and LVGLS (r² = 0.245) was nearly twofold stronger than that between VO_2peak and LVEF (r² = 0.137). Low LVGLS values were associated with low CRF in HFrEF patients. Although a weak correlation was found between systolic function at rest and CRF, the correlation between VO_2peak and LVGLS was nearly twofold stronger than that with LVEF, indicating that LVGLS may be a better predictor of CRF in patients with HFrEF.