Petteri Uotila

Petteri Uotila

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 April 2022 in Geoscientific Model Development
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RDRalf Döscher
Ralf Döscher
MAMario Acosta
Mario Acosta
AAAndrea Alessandri
Andrea Alessandri
PAPeter Anthoni
Peter Anthoni
TAThomas Arsouze
Thomas Arsouze
QZQiong Zhang
Qiong Zhang
The Earth system model EC-Earth3 for contributions to CMIP6 is documented here, with its flexible coupling framework, major model configurations, a methodology for ensuring the simulations are comparable across different high-performance computing (HPC) systems, and with the physical performance of base configurations over the historical period. The variety of possible configurations and sub-models reflects the broad interests in the EC-Earth community. EC-Earth3 key performance metrics demonstrate physical behavior and biases well within the frame known from recent CMIP models. With improved physical and dynamic features, new Earth system model (ESM) components, community tools, and largely improved physical performance compared to the CMIP5 version, EC-Earth3 represents a clear step forward for the only European community ESM. We demonstrate here that EC-Earth3 is suited for a range of tasks in CMIP6 and beyond.

1 March 2013 in Journal of Southern Hemisphere Earth System Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DBD Bi
D Bi
MDM Dix
M Dix
SMS Marsland
S Marsland
SOS O'FArrell
S O'FArrell
HRH Rashid
H Rashid
KPK Puri
K Puri

19 September 2016 in Geoscientific Model Development
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SGStephen M. Griffies
Stephen M. Griffies
GDGokhan Danabasoglu
Gokhan Danabasoglu
PDPaul J. Durack
Paul J. Durack
AAAlistair J. Adcroft
Alistair J. Adcroft
VBV. Balaji
V. Balaji
SYStephen G. Yeager
Stephen G. Yeager
The Ocean Model Intercomparison Project (OMIP) is an endorsed project in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6). OMIP addresses CMIP6 science questions, investigating the origins and consequences of systematic model biases. It does so by providing a framework for evaluating (including assessment of systematic biases), understanding, and improving ocean, sea-ice, tracer, and biogeochemical components of climate and earth system models contributing to CMIP6. Among the WCRP Grand Challenges in climate science (GCs), OMIP primarily contributes to the regional sea level change and near-term (climate/decadal) prediction GCs.OMIP provides (a) an experimental protocol for global ocean/sea-ice models run with a prescribed atmospheric forcing; and (b) a protocol for ocean diagnostics to be saved as part of CMIP6. We focus here on the physical component of OMIP, with a companion paper (Orr et al., 2016) detailing methods for the inert chemistry and interactive biogeochemistry. The physical portion of the OMIP experimental protocol follows the interannual Coordinated Ocean-ice Reference Experiments (CORE-II). Since 2009, CORE-I (Normal Year Forcing) and CORE-II (Interannual Forcing) have become the standard methods to evaluate global ocean/sea-ice simulations and to examine mechanisms for forced ocean climate variability. The OMIP diagnostic protocol is relevant for any ocean model component of CMIP6, including the DECK (Diagnostic, Evaluation and Characterization of Klima experiments), historical simulations, FAFMIP (Flux Anomaly Forced MIP), C4MIP (Coupled Carbon Cycle Climate MIP), DAMIP (Detection and Attribution MIP), DCPP (Decadal Climate Prediction Project), ScenarioMIP, HighResMIP (High Resolution MIP), as well as the ocean/sea-ice OMIP simulations.

1 January 2014 in Ocean Modelling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GDGokhan Danabasoglu
Gokhan Danabasoglu
SYSteve G. Yeager
Steve G. Yeager
DBDavid Bailey
David Bailey
EBErik Behrens
Erik Behrens
MBMats Bentsen
Mats Bentsen
QWQiang Wang
Qiang Wang

26 February 2019 in Frontiers in Marine Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BFBaylor Fox-Kemper
Baylor Fox-Kemper
AAAlistair Adcroft
Alistair Adcroft
CBClaus W. Böning
Claus W. Böning
ECEric P. Chassignet
Eric P. Chassignet
ECEnrique Curchitser
Enrique Curchitser
SYStephen G. Yeager
Stephen G. Yeager
We revisit the challenges and prospects for ocean circulation models following Griffies et al. (2010). Over the past decade, ocean circulation models evolved through improved understanding, numerics, spatial discretization, grid configurations, parameterizations, data assimilation, environmental monitoring, and process-level observations and modeling. Important large scale applications over the last decade are simulations of the Southern Ocean, the Meridional Overturning Circulation and its variability, and regional sea level change. Submesoscale variability is now routinely resolved in process models and permitted in a few global models, and submesoscale effects are parameterized in most global models. The scales where nonhydrostatic effects become important are beginning to be resolved in regional and process models. Coupling to sea ice, ice shelves, and high-resolution atmospheric models has stimulated new ideas and driven improvements in numerics. Observations have provided insight into turbulence and mixing around the globe and its consequences are assessed through perturbed physics models. Relatedly, parameterizations of the mixing and overturning processes in boundary layers and the ocean interior have improved. New diagnostics being used for evaluating models alongside present and novel observations are briefly referenced. The overall goal is summarizing new developments in ocean modeling, including: how new and existing observations can be used, what modeling challenges remain, and how simulations can be used to support observations.

1 January 2016 in Ocean Modelling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GDGokhan Danabasoglu
Gokhan Danabasoglu
SYSteve G. Yeager
Steve G. Yeager
WKWho M. Kim
Who M. Kim
EBErik Behrens
Erik Behrens
MBMats Bentsen
Mats Bentsen
IYIgor Yashayaev
Igor Yashayaev