Agneta Åkesson

Prof. Agneta Åkesson

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

33Years (1994-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2014 in Environmental Health Perspectives
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AÅAgneta Åkesson
Agneta Åkesson
LBLars Barregard
Lars Barregard
IBIngvar A. Bergdahl
Ingvar A. Bergdahl
GNGunnar F. Nordberg
Gunnar F. Nordberg
MNMonica Nordberg
Monica Nordberg
SSStaffan Skerfving
Staffan Skerfving
Background: Exposure to cadmium (Cd) has long been recognized as a health hazard, both in industry and in general populations with high exposure. Under the currently prevailing health risk assessment, the relationship between urinary Cd (U-Cd) concentrations and tubular proteinuria is used. However, doubts have recently been raised regarding the justification of basing the risk assessment on this relationship at very low exposure. Objectives: Our objective was to review available information on health effects of Cd exposure with respect to human health risk assessment. Discussion: The associations between U-Cd and urinary proteins at very low exposure may not be due to Cd toxicity, and the clinical significance of slight proteinuria may also be limited. More importantly, other effects have been reported at very low Cd exposure. There is reason to challenge the basis of the existing health risk assessment for Cd. Our review of the literature found that exposure to low concentrations of Cd is associated with effects on bone, including increased risk of osteoporosis and fractures, and that this observation has implications for the health risk assessment of Cd. Other effects associated with Cd should also be considered, in particular cancer, although the information is still too limited for appropriate use in quantitative risk assessment. Conclusion: Non-renal effects should be considered critical effects in the health risk assessment of Cd. Citation: Åkesson A, Barregard L, Bergdahl IA, Nordberg GF, Nordberg M, Skerfving S. 2014. Non-renal effects and the risk assessment of environmental cadmium exposure. Environ Health Perspect 122:431–438; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1307110

1 August 2008 in Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AÅAgneta Åkesson
Agneta Åkesson
BJBettina Julin
Bettina Julin
AWAlicja Wolk
Alicja Wolk
Environmental pollutants mimicking the effects of estrogen are suggested to contribute to the high incidence of hormone-related cancers, but supporting data are sparse. A potent estrogen-like activity of the pollutant cadmium, mediated via the estrogen receptor-α, has been shown in vivo. We prospectively examined the association between cadmium exposure and incidence of postmenopausal endometrial cancer. The Swedish Mammography Cohort is a population-based prospective cohort of 30,210 postmenopausal women free of cancer diagnose at baseline (1987) and who completed a food frequency questionnaire at baseline and in 1997. We estimated the dietary cadmium intake based on the questionnaire data and the cadmium content in all foods. During 16.0 years (484,274 person-years) of follow-up between the baseline and mid-2006, we ascertained 378 incident cases of endometrioid adenocarcinoma. The average estimated dietary cadmium intake was 15 μg/day (80% from cereals and vegetables). Cadmium intake was statistically significantly associated with increased risk of endometrial cancer in all women; the multivariate relative risk (RR) was 1.39 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.04–1.86; Ptrend = 0.019], comparing highest tertile versus lowest. Among never-smoking women with body mass index (BMI) of <27 kg/m2, the RR was 1.86 (95% CI, 1.13–3.08; Ptrend = 0.009). We observed a 2.9-fold increased risk (95% CI, 1.05–7.79) associated with long-term cadmium intake consistently above the median at both baseline 1987 and in 1997 in never-smoking women with low bioavailable estrogen (BMI of <27 kg/m2 and nonusers of postmenopausal hormones). Our results support the hypothesis that cadmium may exert estrogenic effects and thereby increase the risk of hormone-related cancers. [Cancer Res 2008;68(15):6435–41]

1 November 2015 in Atherosclerosis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TTThanasis G Tektonidis
Thanasis G Tektonidis
AÅAgneta Åkesson
Agneta Åkesson
BGBruna Gigante
Bruna Gigante
AWAlicja Wolk
Alicja Wolk
Susanna C. LarssonSusanna C. Larsson
Susanna C. Larsson

1 September 2014 in JACC
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AÅAgneta Åkesson
Agneta Åkesson
Susanna C. LarssonSusanna C. Larsson
Susanna C. Larsson
ADAndrea Discacciati
Andrea Discacciati
AWAlicja Wolk
Alicja Wolk

14 March 2012 in Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BJBettina Julin
Bettina Julin
AWAlicja Wolk
Alicja Wolk
LBLeif Bergkvist
Leif Bergkvist
MBMatteo Bottai
Matteo Bottai
AÅAgneta Åkesson
Agneta Åkesson
The ubiquitous food contaminant cadmium has features of an estrogen mimetic that may promote the development of estrogen-dependent malignancies, such as breast cancer. However, no prospective studies of cadmium exposure and breast cancer risk have been reported. We examined the association between dietary cadmium exposure (at baseline, 1987) and the risk of overall and estrogen receptor (ER)–defined (ER+ or ER−) breast cancer within a population-based prospective cohort of 55,987 postmenopausal women. During an average of 12.2 years of follow-up, 2,112 incident cases of invasive breast cancer were ascertained (1,626 ER+ and 290 ER−). After adjusting for confounders, including consumption of whole grains and vegetables (which account for 40% of the dietary exposure, but also contain putative anticarcinogenic phytochemicals), dietary cadmium intake was positively associated with overall breast cancer tumors, comparing the highest tertile with the lowest [rate ratio (RR), 1.21; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.07–1.36; Ptrend = 0.02]. Among lean and normal weight women, statistically significant associations were observed for all tumors (RR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.07–1.50) and for ER+ tumors (RR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.03–1.52) and similar, but not statistically significant associations were found for ER− tumors (RR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.76–1.93). The risk of breast cancer increased with increasing cadmium exposure similarly within each tertile of whole grain/vegetable consumption and decreased with increasing consumption of whole grain/vegetables within each tertile of cadmium exposure (Pinteraction = 0.73). Overall, these results suggest a role for dietary cadmium in postmenopausal breast cancer development. Cancer Res; 72(6); 1459–66. ©2012 AACR.

23 August 2010 in Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AEAnnette Engström
Annette Engström
Karl MichaëlssonKarl Michaëlsson
Karl Michaëlsson
YSYasushi Suwazono
Yasushi Suwazono
AWAlicja Wolk
Alicja Wolk
MVMarie Vahter
Marie Vahter
AÅAgneta Åkesson
Agneta Åkesson
All people are exposed to cadmium (Cd) via food; smokers are additionally exposed. High Cd exposure is associated with severe bone damage, but the public health impact in relation to osteoporosis and fractures at low environmental exposure remains to be clarified. Within the population-based Swedish Mammography Cohort, we assessed urinary Cd [U-Cd, µg/g of creatinine (cr)] as a marker of lifetime exposure and bone mineral density (BMD) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) among 2688 women. Register-based information on fractures was retrieved from 1997 to 2009. Associations were evaluated by multivariable regression analyses. In linear regression, U-Cd was inversely associated with BMD at the total body (p < .001), femoral neck (p = .025), total hip (p = .004), lumbar spine (p = .088), and volumetric femoral neck (p = .013). In comparison with women with U-Cd < 0.50 µg/g of cr, those with U-Cd ≥ 0.75 µg/g of cr had odds ratios (ORs) of 2.45 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.51–3.97] and 1.97 (95% CI 1.24–3.14) for osteoporosis at the femoral neck and lumbar spine, respectively. Among never-smokers, the corresponding ORs were 3.47 (95% CI 1.46–8.23) and 3.26 (95% CI 1.44–7.38). For any first fracture (n = 395), the OR was 1.16 (95% CI 0.89–1.50) comparing U-Cd ≥ 0.50 µg/g of cr with lower levels. Among never-smokers, the ORs (95% CIs) were 2.03 (1.33–3.09) for any first fracture, 2.06 (1.28–3.32) for first osteoporotic fracture, 2.18 (1.20–3.94) for first distal forearm fracture, and 1.89 (1.25–2.85) for multiple incident fractures. U-Cd at low environmental exposure from food in a general population of women showed modest but significant association with both BMD and fractures, especially in never-smokers, indicating a larger concern than previously known. © 2011 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.