Rossel Jean-Benoît

Dr. Rossel Jean-Benoît


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2016 in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AMAntonina Mikocka-Walus
Antonina Mikocka-Walus
VPValerie Pittet
Valerie Pittet
RJRossel Jean-Benoît
Rossel Jean-Benoît
CAClaudia Anderegg
Claudia Anderegg
PBPeter Bauerfeind
Peter Bauerfeind
DZDorothee Zimmermann
Dorothee Zimmermann

1 October 2016 in United European Gastroenterology Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SSSolvey Schüle
Solvey Schüle
RJRossel Jean-Benoît
Rossel Jean-Benoît
DFDiana Frey
Diana Frey
LBLuc Biedermann
Luc Biedermann
MSMichael Scharl
Michael Scharl
SSSwiss IBD cohort study
Swiss IBD cohort study
Background: Low bone mineral density (BMD) remains a frequent problem in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). There is no general agreement regarding osteoporosis screening in IBD patients.Methods: Cases of low BMD and disease characteristics were retrieved from 3172 patients of the Swiss IBD cohort study. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted for predictive modeling. In a subgroup of 877 patients, 253 dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans were available for validation.Results: Low BMD was prevalent in 19% of patients. We identified seven predictive factors: type of IBD, age, recent steroid usage, low body mass index, perianal disease, recent high disease activity and malabsorption syndrome. Low BMD could be predicted with a sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 64%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 35% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 93%. The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristics was 0.78. In the validation cohort we calculated a PPV of 26% and an NPV of 88%.Conclusion: We provide a comprehensive analysis of risk factors for low BMD and propose a predictive model with seven clinical variables. The high NPV of models such as ours might help in excluding low BMD to prevent futile investigations.

3 August 2024 in British Journal of Anaesthesia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
YRYves Renard
Yves Renard
KEKariem El-Boghdadly
Kariem El-Boghdadly
RJRossel Jean-Benoît
Rossel Jean-Benoît
ANAlexandre Nguyen
Alexandre Nguyen
CJCécile Jaques
Cécile Jaques
PAProf. Dr. Eric Albrecht
Prof. Dr. Eric Albrecht

23 January 2025 in British Journal of Anaesthesia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
YRYves Renard
Yves Renard
SGSina Grape
Sina Grape
EGErin Gonvers
Erin Gonvers
RJRossel Jean-Benoît
Rossel Jean-Benoît
PGPatrick Goetti
Patrick Goetti
PAProf. Dr. Eric Albrecht
Prof. Dr. Eric Albrecht
We have previously demonstrated that an extrafascial injection of 20 ml of local anaesthetic for interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) reduces the rate of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis by 70% compared with an intrafascial injection, with similar efficacy. In this double-blind trial, we tested the hypothesis that a local anaesthetic volume of 10 ml injected extrafascially would reduce the rate of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis vs a volume of 20 ml, while providing similar analgesia. Sixty ASA physical status 1-3 patients scheduled for elective shoulder surgery under general anaesthesia were randomised to receive ultrasound-guided extrafascial ISB using ropivacaine 0.75% 20 ml (control group) or 10 ml (low-volume group) injected lateral to the brachial plexus sheath. The primary outcome was incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis (diaphragmatic excursion reduction of >75%), measured by M-mode ultrasonography, at 30 min after the procedure. Secondary outcomes included duration of analgesia and i.v. morphine consumption at 24 h after surgery. The 30-min hemidiaphragmatic paralysis rate was 80% (95% confidence interval [CI] 61-91%) in the control group and 19% (95% CI 8-40%) in the low-volume group (P<0.001). Participants in the low-volume vs control group had a shorter duration of analgesia (550 vs 873 min; P<0.01) and higher i.v. morphine consumption (20 vs 12 mg; P=0.03). A low volume of local anaesthetic injected extrafascially reduced the rate of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis, but at the expense of a shorter duration of analgesia compared with standard-dose extrafascial anaesthetic injection. NCT04726280.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MAMaria-Christina Antoniou
Maria-Christina Antoniou
Leah GilbertLeah Gilbert
Leah Gilbert
JGJustine Gross
Justine Gross
RJRossel Jean-Benoît
Rossel Jean-Benoît
CFCéline Fischer Fumeaux
Céline Fischer Fumeaux
JPJardena Puder
Jardena Puder
The objectives of this study were to (a) assess the utility of fetal anthropometric variables to predict the most relevant adverse neonatal outcomes in a treated population with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) beyond the known impact of maternal anthropometric and metabolic parameters and (b) to identify the most important fetal predictors. A total of 189 patients with GDM were included. The fetal predictors included sonographically assessed fetal weight centile (FWC), FWC > 90% and 90% and < 10%, at 29 0/7 to 35 6/7 weeks. Neonatal outcomes comprising neonatal weight centile (NWC), large and small for gestational age (LGA, SGA), hypoglycemia, prematurity, hospitalization for neonatal complication, and (emergency) cesarean section were evaluated. Regression analyses were conducted. Fetal variables predicted anthropometric neonatal outcomes, prematurity, cesarean section and emergency cesarean section. These associations were independent of maternal anthropometric and metabolic predictors, with the exception of cesarean section. FWC was the most significant predictor for NWC, LGA and SGA, while FACC was the most significant predictor for prematurity and FACC > 90% for emergency cesarean section. In women with GDM, third-trimester fetal anthropometric parameters have an important role in predicting adverse neonatal outcomes beyond the impact of maternal predictors.

24 May 2022 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DCDamien Choffat
Damien Choffat
PFPauline Darbellay Farhoumand
Pauline Darbellay Farhoumand
EJEvrim Jaccard
Evrim Jaccard
RHRoxane de La Harpe
Roxane de La Harpe
VKVanessa Kraege
Vanessa Kraege
MMMarie Méan
Marie Méan
Background: Hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism (VTE) is one of the leading preventable causes of in-hospital mortality. However, its risk assessment in medically ill inpatients is complicated due to the patients’ heterogeneity and complexity of currently available risk assessment models (RAMs). The simplified Geneva score provides simplicity but has not yet been prospectively validated. Immobility is an important predictor for VTE in RAMs, but its definition is inconsistent and based on subjective assessment by nurses or physicians. In this study, we aim to prospectively validate the simplified Geneva score and to examine the predictive performance of a novel and objective definition of in-hospital immobilization using accelerometry.Methods and analysis: RISE is a multicenter prospective cohort study. The goal is to recruit 1350 adult inpatients admitted for medical illness in three Swiss tertiary care hospitals. We collect data on demographics, comorbidities, VTE risk and thromboprophylaxis. Mobility from admission to discharge is objectively measured using a wrist-worn accelerometer. Participants are followed for 90 days for the occurrence of symptomatic VTE (primary outcome). Secondary outcomes are the occurrence of clinically relevant bleeding, and mortality. The evolution of autonomy in the activities of daily living, the length of stay, and the occurrence of readmission are also recorded. Time-dependent area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values are calculated for each RAM (i.e. the simplified and original Geneva score, Padua, and IMPROVE score) with and without the objective mobility measures to assess their accuracy in predicting hospital-acquired VTE at 90 days.Ethics and expected impact: The ethics committee approved the protocol and the study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov asNCT04439383. RISE has the potential to optimize VTE risk stratification, and thus to improve the quality of care of medically hospitalized patients.