Hypoglycemic medications are widely used in managing diabetes mellitus, with emerging evidence suggesting their role in cardiac reverse remodeling. This systematic review aims to quantitatively synthesize data regarding the impact of these medications on left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) and end-systolic diameter (LVESD), and to evaluate the clinical relevance of these changes in promoting favorable cardiac outcomes. We conducted a comprehensive search across PubMed, Scopus, and the Web of Science up to 22 April 2024, selecting studies based on inclusion criteria that focused on the impact of hypoglycemic medications on LVEDD and LVESD in patients with diabetes. Studies were selected through a rigorous process, adhering to PRISMA guidelines, and involving various designs including randomized controlled trials and observational studies. The main outcomes were changes in LVEDD and LVESD measured by validated cardiac imaging techniques. A total of ten studies met the inclusion criteria, involving a total of 1180 patients. Treatment durations ranged from 3 to 24 months. Significant improvements in cardiac dimensions were noted with some medications. For instance, Liraglutide treatment over three months significantly improved LVEF from 47.2% to 57.2% and reduced LVEDD and LVESD from 46.5 mm to 45.2 mm and 35.2 mm to 32.7 mm, respectively. In contrast, other medications like Sitagliptin showed minimal impact over 24 months. On average, hypoglycemic medications reduced LVEDD from 58.2 mm to 55.0 mm and LVESD from 48.3 mm to 44.3 mm, with a mean improvement in LVEF from 38.9% to 43.8%. Hypoglycemic medications contribute variably to cardiac reverse remodeling. Medications such as Liraglutide and Dapagliflozin demonstrate significant potential in improving cardiac dimensions and function, indicating their utility beyond glycemic control. This review highlights the need for tailored treatment approaches to maximize cardiac outcomes in patients with diabetes, suggesting a broader therapeutic role for these agents.

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a highly heritable apoB-containing lipoprotein and a causal contributor to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease that may contribute to residual cardiovascular risk after myocardial infarction (MI), while the clinical benefit of selective pharmacological Lp(a) lowering remains unresolved. This narrative review examines Lp(a) as a determinant of residual and recurrent cardiovascular risk after MI, integrating molecular biology, human genetics, coronary imaging, post-MI observational studies, measurement considerations, current management, and emerging therapies. Elevated Lp(a) has been associated with coronary plaque progression, high-risk plaque features, oxidized-phospholipid-related inflammatory pathways, recurrent ischemic events, and repeat revascularization, although prognostic associations vary across populations and endpoints. Because concentrations measured during acute MI may underestimate the stable Lp(a) phenotype in some patients, selective repeat measurement after clinical stabilization may be appropriate when classification could influence management or trial eligibility. Contemporary treatment remains centered on intensive control of LDL-C and other modifiable risk factors, while antisense oligonucleotides, small interfering RNAs, and oral particle-assembly inhibitors can produce profound Lp(a) reductions. According to sponsor-reported topline data released in September 2026, pelacarsen lowered Lp(a) but did not significantly reduce the prespecified primary cardiovascular endpoint in the overall Lp(a)HORIZON population; complete peer-reviewed results are not yet available. The sponsor-reported neutral HORIZON topline result raises unresolved questions regarding baseline Lp(a) and absolute reduction, timing of intervention and disease stage, and endpoint composition. Full peer-reviewed HORIZON data and ongoing cardiovascular outcome trials will be required to determine whether and under what conditions selective Lp(a) lowering translates into cardiovascular benefit.