Sanghon Park

Dr. Sanghon Park


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 April 2024 in Current Applied Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RRRafi Ur Rahman
Rafi Ur Rahman
MKMuhammad Quddamah Khokhar
Muhammad Quddamah Khokhar
SHShahzada Qamar Hussain
Shahzada Qamar Hussain
HMHaris Mehmood
Haris Mehmood
HYHasnain Yousuf
Hasnain Yousuf
JYJunsin Yi
Junsin Yi

1 May 2025 in ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YJYunhui Jang
Yunhui Jang
YJYeojin Jeong
Yeojin Jeong
SJSeokjin Jang
Seokjin Jang
TCTaehyun Cho
Taehyun Cho
ZPZhong Pan
Zhong Pan
JYJunsin Yi
Junsin Yi

1 January 2017 in Journal of Korean Medical Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YLYeon Joo Lee
Yeon Joo Lee
DLDong Seon Lee
Dong Seon Lee
HMHyunju Min
Hyunju Min
YCYun Young Choi
Yun Young Choi
ELEun Young Lee
Eun Young Lee
SPSanghon Park
Sanghon Park
Lee YJ, et al. J Korean Med Sci. 2017 Apr;32(4):688-694. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2017.32.4.688

7 January 2020 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HLHyun Hee Lee
Hyun Hee Lee
HKHyun-Mi Kim
Hyun-Mi Kim
JLJi Eun Lee
Ji Eun Lee
YJYoung-Tae Jeon
Young-Tae Jeon
SPSanghon Park
Sanghon Park
JHJung Ho Han
Jung Ho Han
Background: We performed this prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial to identify the effect of a preoperative prophylactic transdermal scopolamine (TDS) patch on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after retromastoid craniectomy with microvascular decompression (RMC-MVD). Methods: We recruited 38 patients undergoing RMC-MVD and randomized them into two groups: the TDS group (n = 19, application of the TDS patch) and placebo group (n = 19, application of a sham patch). Nausea (as a self-reported 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) score; range, 0 (no nausea) to 10 (worst nausea)), vomiting, and the use of antiemetics were the primary endpoints. Results: There was no significant difference in terms of the incidence of PONV (73.7% in the TDS group and 78.9% in the placebo group; p = 1.00) between the groups. However, the mean nausea VAS score was significantly different at arrival to the general ward (0.93 ± 1.71 in the TDS group vs. 2.52 ± 2.85 in the placebo group; p = 0.046), and throughout the study period (0.03 ± 0.07 in the TDS group vs. 0.44 ± 0.71 in the placebo group; p = 0.029). Rescue antiemetics were more frequently used in the placebo group than in the TDS group (9 (47.4%) vs. 2 (10.5%), respectively; p = 0.029). The mean number of antiemetics used throughout the study period was significantly higher in the placebo group than in the TDS group (1.37 ± 2.19 vs. 0.16 ± 0.50, respectively; p = 0.029). Conclusions: The preoperative prophylactic use of a TDS patch was safe and effective in the management of PONV after RMC-MVD in terms of the severity of PONV and the use of rescue antiemetics.

13 January 2025 in ACS Applied Energy Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ALAlamgeer
Alamgeer
PMPolgampola Chamani Madara
Polgampola Chamani Madara
MKMuhammad Quddamah Khokhar
Muhammad Quddamah Khokhar
HYHasnain Yousuf
Hasnain Yousuf
JJJaljalalul Abedin Jony
Jaljalalul Abedin Jony
JYJunsin Yi
Junsin Yi

25 April 2024 in Current Applied Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MAMaha Nur Aida
Maha Nur Aida
MKMuhammad Quddamah Khokhar
Muhammad Quddamah Khokhar
MZMuhammad Aleem Zahid
Muhammad Aleem Zahid
RRRafi Ur Rahman
Rafi Ur Rahman
SPSanghon Park
Sanghon Park
JYJunsin Yi
Junsin Yi