“Trifecta” in partial nephrectomy consists of negative surgical margins, minimal renal function decrease and absence of complications. In the present article, our single-center robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) experience in T1b renal masses is reported in terms of strict Trifecta outcomes. This is a retrospective analysis of patients with a tumor diameter between 4 and 7 cm (stage T1b), who underwent RAPN by a single surgeon. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were recorded and analyzed to evaluate short-term functional and oncologic outcomes. Patients with absence of grade ≥ 2 Clavien-Dindo complications, warm ischemia time (WIT) ≤25 minutes, ≤15% postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decrease and negative surgical margins were reported to achieve strict Trifecta outcomes. P < .05 was indicated statistically significant. A total of 150 patients underwent RAPN, and 50 patients were identified with tumor size between 4 and 7 cm. Mean WIT was 20.8 ± 6.2 minutes and mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 269 ± 191 mL. Surgical margins were negative in all patients. Eleven patients (22%) had a >15% eGFR decrease after surgery. Nine patients (18%) had WIT longer than 25 minutes. Four patients (8%) had grade ≥2 Clavien-Dindo complications. Twenty-nine (58%) patients had strict Trifecta outcomes. Mean follow-up was 44.2 ± 27.2 months. Tumor recurrence was not observed in any patient. Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for T1b renal masses can be safely performed in experienced hands. Optimal strict Trifecta outcomes and recurrence rates can be achieved.

Introduction: Robot-assisted bladder diverticulectomy (RABD) through a technique for easier identification of diverticulum along with concomitant management of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) utilizing a combination of transurethral prostatectomy (TUR-P) and photoselective vaporization of prostate (PVP) is presented. Materials and Methods: Between 2008 and 2015, 9 patients underwent RABD with concurrent treatment of BOO. Diverticula were identified by a technique of catheterizing the diverticulum and the bladder simultaneously and individually. Results: Mean patient age was 62 ± 9.8 and prostate volume was 70 ± 26 ml. Mean time for endourological procedure was 77 ± 35, mean console and total operative times were 108 ± 38 and 186 ± 56 min, respectively. Mean estimated blood loss was 71 ± 37 ml. All diverticula were excised and BOO treated successfully. Bladder irrigation was not necessary in any patient. Mean hospitalization and catheter removal time was 5 ± 3 and 8 ± 3 days, respectively. No complications were observed. Conclusions: BOO is the main cause of acquired bladder diverticula and is largely due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Concomitant performance of TUR-P and PVP along with RABD is feasible and safe. Individual catheterization of the diverticulum and bladder facilitates the identification of diverticulum even in the presence of multiple diverticula.

Objective: To report our experience with concomitant hernia repair during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with a nonprosthetic and tissue-based technique. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review on 1005 consecutive patients who underwent RARP between the years 2005 and 2015. Twenty-nine patients, who underwent 37, concurrent, direct, inguinal hernia repairs, were identified (group 1) and compared to a match control group of 29 patients who underwent RARP without hernia repair (group 2). Cases were matched 1:1 for age, body–mass index, and pathologic stage. The reinforcement of the floor was achieved with a modified posterior wall darn repair. The repair consisted of suturing the lateral edge of the rectus abdominis muscle sheath to the ileopectineal ligament (Cooper's ligament) with continuous prolene loose suture. This technique provided a tissue-based repair and the final reinforcement of the floor was expected to ensue by the secondary fibrotic tissue development and maturing between the sutures. Results: From a total of 1005 patients who underwent RARP, 29 (2.8%) were preoperatively identified with a primary, direct inguinal hernia and underwent concomitant inguinal herniorrhaphy. The operative time was 147 minutes for group 1 vs 143 minutes for group 2 (p = 0.8). Estimated blood loss was 175 mL for the group with the hernia repair vs 200 mL for the group without repair (p = 0.3). There were no Clavien–Dindo grade >1 complications observed in either of the groups. Mean follow-up period was 32.1 months for group 1 vs 33.3 for group 2 (p = 0.8). Importantly, no hernia recurrences were observed. Conclusions: Inguinal hernias represent an important surgical issue and may be repaired concurrently during radical prostatectomy to minimize the risks of postoperative complications. The concomitant repair of inguinal hernias during robotic radical prostatectomy utilizing a nonprosthetic is a safe and feasible alternative for primary direct hernia repair during prostatectomy.