Marco Fontani

Dr. Marco Fontani


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2000 in Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Luigi MessoriLuigi Messori
Luigi Messori
FAFrancesco Abbate
Francesco Abbate
GMGiordana Marcon
Giordana Marcon
POPierluigi Orioli
Pierluigi Orioli
MFMarco Fontani
Marco Fontani
PZPiero Zanello
Piero Zanello

1 August 2000 in Inorganica Chimica Acta
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Domenico OsellaDomenico Osella
Domenico Osella
MFMarco Ferrali
Marco Ferrali
PZPiero Zanello
Piero Zanello
FLFranco Laschi
Franco Laschi
MFMarco Fontani
Marco Fontani
GCGiorgio Cavigiolio
Giorgio Cavigiolio

1 October 1998 in European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MFMarco Fontani
Marco Fontani
FPFrank Peters
Frank Peters
WSWolfgang Scherer
Wolfgang Scherer
WWWolfgang Wachter
Wolfgang Wachter
MWMatthias Wagner
Matthias Wagner
PZPiero Zanello
Piero Zanello

28 September 2022 in Journal of Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Luca GuarneraLuca Guarnera
Luca Guarnera
OGOliver Giudice
Oliver Giudice
FGFrancesco Guarnera
Francesco Guarnera
Alessandro OrtisAlessandro Ortis
Alessandro Ortis
GPGiovanni Puglisi
Giovanni Puglisi
Sebastiano BattiatoSebastiano Battiato
Sebastiano Battiato
Multimedia data manipulation and forgery has never been easier than today, thanks to the power of Artificial Intelligence (AI). AI-generated fake content, commonly called Deepfakes, have been raising new issues and concerns, but also new challenges for the research community. The Deepfake detection task has become widely addressed, but unfortunately, approaches in the literature suffer from generalization issues. In this paper, the Face Deepfake Detection and Reconstruction Challenge is described. Two different tasks were proposed to the participants: (i) creating a Deepfake detector capable of working in an “in the wild” scenario; (ii) creating a method capable of reconstructing original images from Deepfakes. Real images from CelebA and FFHQ and Deepfake images created by StarGAN, StarGAN-v2, StyleGAN, StyleGAN2, AttGAN and GDWCT were collected for the competition. The winning teams were chosen with respect to the highest classification accuracy value (Task I) and “minimum average distance to Manhattan” (Task II). Deep Learning algorithms, particularly those based on the EfficientNet architecture, achieved the best results in Task I. No winners were proclaimed for Task II. A detailed discussion of teams’ proposed methods with corresponding ranking is presented in this paper.

18 February 2000 in Chemistry – A European Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DHDarren G. Hamilton
Darren G. Hamilton
MMMarco Montalti
Marco Montalti
LPLuca Prodi
Luca Prodi
MFMarco Fontani
Marco Fontani
PZPiero Zanello
Piero Zanello
JSJeremy K. M. Sanders
Jeremy K. M. Sanders

6 June 2003 in Chemistry – A European Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
USUlrich Siemeling
Ulrich Siemeling
JBJens Vor der Brüggen
Jens Vor der Brüggen
UVUdo Vorfeld
Udo Vorfeld
BNBeate Neumann
Beate Neumann
ASAnja Stammler
Anja Stammler
GGGagik Gurzadyan
Gagik Gurzadyan