Eduardo F. Camacho

Eduardo F. Camacho


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

42Years (1985-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 1999
Verified
Book
Closed access
ECEduardo F. Camacho
Eduardo F. Camacho
CBCarlos Bordons
Carlos Bordons

1 June 2005 in Automatica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Teodoro AlamoTeodoro Alamo
Teodoro Alamo
JBJ.M. Bravo
J.M. Bravo
ECEduardo F. Camacho
Eduardo F. Camacho

1 September 2008 in Automatica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DLD. Limon
D. Limon
IAI. Alvarado
I. Alvarado
Teodoro AlamoTeodoro Alamo
Teodoro Alamo
ECEduardo F. Camacho
Eduardo F. Camacho

1 March 2010 in Journal of Process Control
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DLD. Limon
D. Limon
IAI. Alvarado
I. Alvarado
Teodoro AlamoTeodoro Alamo
Teodoro Alamo
ECEduardo F. Camacho
Eduardo F. Camacho

1 January 1995
Verified
Book
Closed access
ECEduardo F. Camacho
Eduardo F. Camacho
CBCarlos Bordons-Alba
Carlos Bordons-Alba

15 May 2006 in IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DLD. Limon
D. Limon
Teodoro AlamoTeodoro Alamo
Teodoro Alamo
FSFrancisco Salas
Francisco Salas
ECEduardo F. Camacho
Eduardo F. Camacho
The usual way to guarantee stability of model predictive control (MPC) strategies is based on a terminal cost function and a terminal constraint region. This note analyzes the stability of MPC when the terminal constraint is removed. This is particularly interesting when the system is unconstrained on the state. In this case, the computational burden of the optimization problem does not have to be increased by introducing terminal state constraints due to stabilizing reasons. A region in which the terminal constraint can be removed from the optimization problem is characterized depending on some of the design parameters of MPC. This region is a domain of attraction of the MPC without terminal constraint. Based on this result, it is proved that weighting the terminal cost, this domain of attraction of the MPC controller without terminal constraint is enlarged reaching (practically) the same domain of attraction of the MPC with terminal constraint; moreover, a practical procedure to calculate the stabilizing weighting factor for a given initial state is shown. Finally, these results are extended to the case of suboptimal solutions and an asymptotically stabilizing suboptimal controller without terminal constraint is presented.