Muhammed Enes Atik

Dr. Muhammed Enes Atik

Istanbul Technical University, Civil Engineering Faculty, Geomatics Engineering Department, 34469 Maslak, Istanbul, Turkey
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Muhammed Enes AtikMuhammed Enes Atik
Muhammed Enes Atik
Zaide DuranZaide Duran
Zaide Duran
Dursun Zafer SEKERDursun Zafer SEKER
Dursun Zafer SEKER
3D scene classification has become an important research field in photogrammetry, remote sensing, computer vision and robotics with the widespread usage of 3D point clouds. Point cloud classification, called semantic labeling, semantic segmentation, or semantic classification of point clouds is a challenging topic. Machine learning, on the other hand, is a powerful mathematical tool used to classify 3D point clouds whose content can be significantly complex. In this study, the classification performance of different machine learning algorithms in multiple scales was evaluated. The feature spaces of the points in the point cloud were created using the geometric features generated based on the eigenvalues of the covariance matrix. Eight supervised classification algorithms were tested in four different areas from three datasets (the Dublin City dataset, Vaihingen dataset and Oakland3D dataset). The algorithms were evaluated in terms of overall accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score and process time. The best overall results were obtained for four test areas with different algorithms. Dublin City Area 1 was obtained with Random Forest as 93.12%, Dublin City Area 2 was obtained with a Multilayer Perceptron algorithm as 92.78%, Vaihingen was obtained as 79.71% with Support Vector Machines and Oakland3D with Linear Discriminant Analysis as 97.30%.

1 April 2022 in Journal of Applied Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ŞAŞaziye Özge Atik
Şaziye Özge Atik
Muhammed Enes AtikMuhammed Enes Atik
Muhammed Enes Atik
CICengizhan Ipbuker
Cengizhan Ipbuker
Rapid urban growth and globalization affect land use in cities, and the need for automatic interpretation of remote sensing images is constantly increasing. Deep neural networks are becoming widespread in high-resolution aerial and satellite image sources in Earth observation missions. Various convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures have been implemented in building extraction, but it is still challenging to distinguish building class from other man-made classes in public datasets. Here, we present comparative research for automatic building extraction on different data sources using DeepLabV3+ architecture with ResNet-18, ResNet-50, Xception, and MobileNetv2 models. The CNNs are implemented on Inria Aerial Image Labeling, Massachusetts Buildings, and Wuhan University Building Extraction Datasets in terms of evaluation metrics and training and testing time consumption. Our implementation of the DeepLabV3 + ResNet-50 model performed F1-score of 97.44% in Massachusetts Building dataset and intersection over union as 80.75% in Inria dataset, higher than at least 3% than the previous studies.

24 September 2021 in Drones
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Zaide DuranZaide Duran
Zaide Duran
KOKubra Ozcan
Kubra Ozcan
Muhammed Enes AtikMuhammed Enes Atik
Muhammed Enes Atik
With the development of photogrammetry technologies, point clouds have found a wide range of use in academic and commercial areas. This situation has made it essential to extract information from point clouds. In particular, artificial intelligence applications have been used to extract information from point clouds to complex structures. Point cloud classification is also one of the leading areas where these applications are used. In this study, the classification of point clouds obtained by aerial photogrammetry and Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) technology belonging to the same region is performed by using machine learning. For this purpose, nine popular machine learning methods have been used. Geometric features obtained from point clouds were used for the feature spaces created for classification. Color information is also added to these in the photogrammetric point cloud. According to the LiDAR point cloud results, the highest overall accuracies were obtained as 0.96 with the Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) method. The lowest overall accuracies were obtained as 0.50 with the AdaBoost method. The method with the highest overall accuracy was achieved with the MLP (0.90) method. The lowest overall accuracy method is the GNB method with 0.25 overall accuracy.

27 December 2024 in Drones
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Muhammed Enes AtikMuhammed Enes Atik
Muhammed Enes Atik
Mehmet ArkalıMehmet Arkalı
Mehmet Arkalı
Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) systems have recently become essential for mapping, surveying, and three-dimensional (3D) modeling applications. These systems are capable of providing highly accurate products through integrated advanced technologies, including a digital camera, inertial measurement unit (IMU), and Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS). UAVs are a cost-effective alternative to traditional aerial photogrammetry, and recent advancements demonstrate their effectiveness in many applications. In UAV-based photogrammetry, ground control points (GCPs) are utilized for georeferencing to enhance positioning precision. The distribution, number, and location of GCPs in the study area play a crucial role in determining the accuracy of photogrammetric products. This research evaluates the accuracy of positioning techniques for image acquisition for photogrammetric production and the effect of GCP distribution models. The camera position was determined using real-time kinematic (RTK), post-processed kinematic (PPK), and precise point positioning-ambiguity resolution (PPP-AR) techniques. In the criteria for determining the GCPs, six models were established within the İstanbul Technical University, Ayazaga Campus. To assess the accuracy of the points in these models, the horizontal, vertical, and 3D root mean square error (RMSE) values were calculated, holding the test points stationary in place. In the study, 2.5 cm horizontal RMSE and 3.0 cm vertical RMSE were obtained with the model containing five homogeneous GCPs by the indirect georeferencing method. The highest RMSE values of all three components in RTK, PPK, and PPP-AR methods were obtained without GCPs. For all six models, all techniques have an error value of sub-decimeter. The PPP-AR technique yields error values that are comparable to those of the other techniques. The PPP-AR appears to be an alternative to RTK and PPK, which usually require infrastructure, labor, and higher costs.

1 January 2020 in Baltic Journal of Modern Computing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SCSumeyye Cepni
Sumeyye Cepni
Muhammed Enes AtikMuhammed Enes Atik
Muhammed Enes Atik
Zaide DuranZaide Duran
Zaide Duran

27 February 2024 in IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Muhammed Enes AtikMuhammed Enes Atik
Muhammed Enes Atik
Zaide DuranZaide Duran
Zaide Duran
Dursun Zafer SEKERDursun Zafer SEKER
Dursun Zafer SEKER
Point clouds are one of the widely used data sources for spatial modeling. Artificial intelligence approaches have become an important tool for understanding and extracting semantic information of point clouds. In particular, the explainability of machine learning approaches for 3D data has not been sufficiently investigated. Moreover, existing studies are generally limited to object classification issues. This is a pioneer study that addresses the classification of photogrammetric point clouds in terms of explainable artificial intelligence. In this study, the explainability of black-box machine learning models in the context of the classification of photogrammetric point clouds was investigated. Each point in the point cloud is defined using geometric and spectral features. Additionally, the effect of selecting the most important of these features on the classification performance of ML models such as Random Forest, XGBoost and LightGBM was examined. The explainability of ML models was analyzed with Shapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP), an explainable artificial intelligence approach. SHAP analysis was compared with filterbased Information Gain (IG) and ReliefF methods for feature selection. Using the features selected with SHAP analysis, overall accuracy (OA) of 85.50% in the Ankeny dataset, 91.70% in the Building dataset and 83.28% in the Cadastre dataset was achieved with LightGBM. The evaluation with XGBoost shows overall accuracy of 85.22% for Ankeny, 91.21% for Building and 82.47% for Cadastre. The evaluation with RF shows overall accuracy of 83.70% for Ankeny, 89.08% for Building and 79.36% for Cadastre.