Joint Diseases and Related Surgery (JDRS), the official journal of the Turkish Joint Diseases Foundation, is an international, peer-reviewed, immediate open access journal. All published articles in JDRS has been free for everyone, without embargo, since 1990.

Objectives: Behcet's disease (BD) is characterized by systemic vasculitis with inflammation that can affect various body organs. In BD, vasculitis primarily manifests with venous involvement, distinguishing it from other forms of systemic vasculitis. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the demographic and clinical characteristics of 147 patients diagnosed with vascular BD in our center. Results: Vascular BD cases accounted for 25.0% (147 out of 589) of all BD patients. A statistically significant correlation was found between gender and vascular involvement that was seen predominantly in males (76.9%). In 71 patients, a vascular event devel-oped during follow-up for BD, while in 76 patients the disease was diagnosed after the occurrence of a vascular event (51.7%). The most common vascular event was deep vein thrombosis in the lower extremities (69.4%). Arterial involvement was primarily observed in the pulmonary arteries (12.9%). Patients with lower extremity deep vein thrombosis tended to be younger, while those with pulmonary artery involvement were typically older. Overall, veins were affected 4.5 times more frequently than arteries. Conclusion: The prevalent type of venous involvement was deep vein thrombosis in the lower extremities. Thrombotic events in BD cannot be solely attributed to abnormalities in thrombotic factors. The treatment of thrombotic events in BD remains conten-tious, with anticoagulant efficacy being debated and immunosuppressive therapy representing the primary treatment approach. Behcet's disease should be considered when a young male patient presents with an arterial or venous vascular event, especially if it is recurrent.

Joint Diseases and Related Surgery (JDRS), the official journal of the Turkish Joint Diseases Foundation, is an international, peer-reviewed, immediate open access journal. All published articles in JDRS has been free for everyone, without embargo, since 1990.

Introduction: One of the factors that may aggravate the clinical presentation in COVID-19 is the increased level of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) and thrombotic events that can be seen with the disease. In our retrospective study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of aPLs on the clinical findings in patients with a diagnosis of COVID-19. Methodology: Seventy-three patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and examined for aPLs were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups according to the test results of aPLs. Clinical and laboratory parameters were compared in both groups to reveal whether there was any difference between the groups. Results: There were 15 patients with a positive aPLs test. Dyspnea, nausea, vomiting, myalgia, and abdominal pain were significantly higher in the aPLs positive group than those with negative aPLs. The duration of hospital stays and the need for oxygen therapy of the patients in the aPLs positive group were significantly higher than the aPLs negative group. However, no difference was found between the two groups in terms of mechanical ventilation need, intensive care admission rate, thrombosis and mortality. In terms of laboratory findings, those with positive aPLs have higher median C-reactive protein (CRP) and ferritin values than those with negative aPLs. Conclusions: In our study group, we could not find a relationship between aPLs positivity and critical complications. According to our hypothesis, it may not be necessary to routinely examine aPLs in patients with a diagnosis of COVID-19 to determine the risk of thromboembolic complications.