Norbert Psuty

Norbert Psuty

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 February 2010 in Journal of Coastal Conservation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NPNorbert Psuty
Norbert Psuty
TSTanya Silveira
Tanya Silveira

1 March 1998 in Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NSN.S. Suk
N.S. Suk
Qizhong GuoQizhong Guo
Qizhong Guo
NPNorbert Psuty
Norbert Psuty

1 June 2009 in Journal of Coastal Conservation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NPNorbert Psuty
Norbert Psuty
MMM. Luisa Martínez
M. Luisa Martínez
JLJorge Lopez-Portillo
Jorge Lopez-Portillo
TSTanya Silveira
Tanya Silveira
JGJosé G. García-Franco
José G. García-Franco
NRNatalia A. Rodríguez
Natalia A. Rodríguez

27 December 2018 in Geosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NPNorbert Psuty
Norbert Psuty
KAKatherine Ames
Katherine Ames
AHAndrea Habeck
Andrea Habeck
GLGlenn Liu
Glenn Liu
Beach nourishment was applied at three fetch-restricted sites along the estuarine margin of Delaware Bay, New Jersey. Evaluation of geomorphological performance of the nourishment project was conducted through seasonal monitoring to track linear features (shoreline, dune crest, peat edge) and to create digital elevation models (DEMs). Comparisons of the DEMs yielded sediment budgets of the updrift, fill area, and downdrift zones as well as the spatial and temporal evolution of the tidal flat, beach, and dune features within the zones. Through four years, Moore’s Beach lost all of the emplaced fill as well as an additional −5446 m3 from the fill area. The shoreline position shifted inland −12.78 m, and the foredune crest shifted inland −9.23 m. The fill area at Pierce’s Point lost all of the fill and an additional −3810 m3. The shoreline and dune crest shifted inland −7.35 m and −1.17 m, respectively. The Reed’s Beach study area benefited from beach fill updrift that more than offset the losses in the fill area, a net gain of 2107 m3. There was a major contrast in volumetric change between the updrift and downdrift portions. Sediment budget calculations established alongshore transport was an important factor in the fetch-restricted estuarine environment driving the variable geomorphological responses in the updrift, fill, and downdrift zones.

30 May 2008 in Geomorphology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NPNorbert Psuty
Norbert Psuty
JPJeffrey P. Pace
Jeffrey P. Pace