Robert John Paxton

Prof. Dr. Robert John Paxton

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

46Years (1981-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2013 in Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AVAdam J Vanbergen
Adam J Vanbergen
MBMathilde Baude
Mathilde Baude
JBJacobus C Biesmeijer
Jacobus C Biesmeijer
NBNicholas F Britton
Nicholas F Britton
MBMark J F Brown
Mark J F Brown
GWGeraldine A Wright
Geraldine A Wright
Insect pollinators of crops and wild plants are under threat globally and their decline or loss could have profound economic and environmental consequences. Here, we argue that multiple anthropogenic pressures – including land‐use intensification, climate change, and the spread of alien species and diseases – are primarily responsible for insect‐pollinator declines. We show that a complex interplay between pressures (eg lack of food sources, diseases, and pesticides) and biological processes (eg species dispersal and interactions) at a range of scales (from genes to ecosystems) underpins the general decline in insect‐pollinator populations. Interdisciplinary research on the nature and impacts of these interactions will be needed if human food security and ecosystem function are to be preserved. We highlight key areas that require research focus and outline some practical steps to alleviate the pressures on pollinators and the pollination services they deliver to wild and crop plants.

19 February 2014 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MFM. A. Fürst
M. A. Fürst
DMDino P. McMahon
Dino P. McMahon
JOJ. L. Osborne
J. L. Osborne
RPRobert John Paxton
Robert John Paxton
MBM. J. F. Brown
M. J. F. Brown
Laboratory infection experiments and field data show that emerging infectious diseases of honeybees are widespread infectious agents within the pollinator assemblage; the prevalence of deformed wing virus (DWV) and the parasite Nosema ceranae in honeybees and bumblebees is linked, and sympatric bumblebees and honeybees are infected by the same DWV strains, indicating ongoing disease transmission. Efficient pollination is vital for both crop production and ecosystem sustainability, and there is evidence to suggest that emerging infectious diseases are contributing to a decline in populations of some important insect pollinators. This study combines laboratory infection experiments and field studies to demonstrate infectivity of two serious honeybee (Apis mellifera) pathogens in a wild pollinator, the bumblebee (Bombus terrestris). Data from across the United Kingdom show that there is co-localization of deformed wing virus (DWV) and the microsporidian parasite Nosema ceranae in the two types of pollinator, and that the honeybee disease can be infectious in bumblebees. This work indicates that wild pollinator populations may be at risk, and unlike managed populations of Apis, they are not protected by intervention from beekeepers. Such a loss of wild pollinators would significantly decrease crop pollination efficiency. Emerging infectious diseases (EIDs) pose a risk to human welfare, both directly1 and indirectly, by affecting managed livestock and wildlife that provide valuable resources and ecosystem services, such as the pollination of crops2. Honeybees (Apis mellifera), the prevailing managed insect crop pollinator, suffer from a range of emerging and exotic high-impact pathogens3,4, and population maintenance requires active management by beekeepers to control them. Wild pollinators such as bumblebees (Bombus spp.) are in global decline5,6, one cause of which may be pathogen spillover from managed pollinators like honeybees7,8 or commercial colonies of bumblebees9. Here we use a combination of infection experiments and landscape-scale field data to show that honeybee EIDs are indeed widespread infectious agents within the pollinator assemblage. The prevalence of deformed wing virus (DWV) and the exotic parasite Nosema ceranae in honeybees and bumblebees is linked; as honeybees have higher DWV prevalence, and sympatric bumblebees and honeybees are infected by the same DWV strains, Apis is the likely source of at least one major EID in wild pollinators. Lessons learned from vertebrates10,11 highlight the need for increased pathogen control in managed bee species to maintain wild pollinators, as declines in native pollinators may be caused by interspecies pathogen transmission originating from managed pollinators.

1 September 2007 in Journal of Invertebrate Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JKJulia Klee
Julia Klee
ABAndrea M. Besana
Andrea M. Besana
EGElke Genersch
Elke Genersch
SGSebastian Gisder
Sebastian Gisder
ANAntonio Nanetti
Antonio Nanetti
RPRobert John Paxton
Robert John Paxton

1 May 2009 in Apidologie
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MBMark J. F. Brown
Mark J. F. Brown
RPRobert John Paxton
Robert John Paxton

12 March 2012 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AVAlejandra Vásquez
Alejandra Vásquez
EFEva Forsgren
Eva Forsgren
IFIngemar Fries
Ingemar Fries
RPRobert John Paxton
Robert John Paxton
EFEmilie Flaberg
Emilie Flaberg
TOTobias C. Olofsson
Tobias C. Olofsson
Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are well recognized beneficial host-associated members of the microbiota of humans and animals. Yet LAB-associations of invertebrates have been poorly characterized and their functions remain obscure. Here we show that honeybees possess an abundant, diverse and ancient LAB microbiota in their honey crop with beneficial effects for bee health, defending them against microbial threats. Our studies of LAB in all extant honeybee species plus related apid bees reveal one of the largest collections of novel species from the genera Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium ever discovered within a single insect and suggest a long (>80 mya) history of association. Bee associated microbiotas highlight Lactobacillus kunkeei as the dominant LAB member. Those showing potent antimicrobial properties are acquired by callow honey bee workers from nestmates and maintained within the crop in biofilms, though beekeeping management practices can negatively impact this microbiota. Prophylactic practices that enhance LAB, or supplementary feeding of LAB, may serve in integrated approaches to sustainable pollinator service provision. We anticipate this microbiota will become central to studies on honeybee health, including colony collapse disorder, and act as an exemplar case of insect-microbe symbiosis.

10 July 2019 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MAMarcelo A. Aizen
Marcelo A. Aizen
SASebastián Aguiar
Sebastián Aguiar
JBJacobus C. Biesmeijer
Jacobus C. Biesmeijer
LGLucas Alejandro Garibaldi
Lucas Alejandro Garibaldi
DIDavid W. Inouye
David W. Inouye
CSColleen Seymour
Colleen Seymour
The global increase in the proportion of land cultivated with pollinator‐dependent crops implies increased reliance on pollination services. Yet agricultural practices themselves can profoundly affect pollinator supply and pollination. Extensive monocultures are associated with a limited pollinator supply and reduced pollination, whereas agricultural diversification can enhance both. Therefore, areas where agricultural diversity has increased, or at least been maintained, may better sustain high and more stable productivity of pollinator‐dependent crops. Given that >80% of all crops depend, to varying extents, on insect pollination, a global increase in agricultural pollinator dependence over recent decades might have led to a concomitant increase in agricultural diversification. We evaluated whether an increase in the area of pollinator‐dependent crops has indeed been associated with an increase in agricultural diversity, measured here as crop diversity, at the global, regional, and country scales for the period 1961–2016. Globally, results show a relatively weak and decelerating rise in agricultural diversity over time that was largely decoupled from the strong and continually increasing trend in agricultural dependency on pollinators. At regional and country levels, there was no consistent relationship between temporal changes in pollinator dependence and crop diversification. Instead, our results show heterogeneous responses in which increasing pollinator dependence for some countries and regions has been associated with either an increase or a decrease in agricultural diversity. Particularly worrisome is a rapid expansion of pollinator‐dependent oilseed crops in several countries of the Americas and Asia that has resulted in a decrease in agricultural diversity. In these regions, reliance on pollinators is increasing, yet agricultural practices that undermine pollination services are expanding. Our analysis has thereby identified world regions of particular concern where environmentally damaging practices associated with large‐scale, industrial agriculture threaten key ecosystem services that underlie productivity, in addition to other benefits provided by biodiversity.