Lower gastrointestinal endoscopy is considered the gold standard for the diagnosis and removal of colonic polyps. Delays in colonoscopy following a positive fecal immunochemical test increase the likelihood of advanced adenomas and colorectal cancer (CRC) occurrence. However, patients may refuse to undergo conventional colonoscopy (CC) due to fear of possible risks and pain or discomfort. In this regard, patients undergoing CC frequently require sedation to better tolerate the procedure, increasing the risk of deep sedation or other complications related to sedation. Accordingly, the use of CC as a first-line screening strategy for CRC is hampered by patients’ reluctance due to its invasiveness and anxiety about possible discomfort. To overcome the limitations of CC and improve patients’ compliance, several studies have investigated the use of robotic colonoscopy (RC) both in experimental models and in vivo. Self-propelling robotic colonoscopes have proven to be promising thanks to their peculiar dexterity and adaptability to the shape of the lower gastrointestinal tract, allowing a virtually painless examination of the colon. In some instances, when alternatives to CC and RC are required, barium enema (BE), computed tomographic colonography (CTC), and colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) may be options. However, BE and CTC are limited by the need for subsequent investigations whenever suspicious lesions are found. In this narrative review, we discussed the current clinical applications of RC, CTC, and CCE, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of different endoscopic procedures, with a particular focus on RC.

Adalimumab (ADA) is a human anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) monoclonal antibody used in inflammatory bowel diseases, such as Crohn’s disease (CD). Vitamin-D (VD) is important for biological functions, such as the modulation of expression of genes encoding enzymes and transporters involved in drug metabolism and transport. ADA trough levels were associated with VD concentrations in patients with IBD, but no data are present in the literature concerning VD pathway-related gene single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in affecting clinical outcomes. For this reason, the aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of VD-related genetics to predict clinical remission at 3 and 12 months in patients affected by CD treated with ADA. Patients affected by CD were included in this study. SNPs in CYP27B1, CYP24A1, GC, and VDR genes were analyzed through real-time PCR. A total of 63 patients were enrolled. Calprotectin, hemoglobin, and C-reactive protein levels were influenced by SNPs in VDR, CYP27B1, and GC genes. After 3 months of therapy, clinical remission was predicted by smoke, systemic steroids, and VDR BsmI, whereas at 12 months by GC 1296AA/AC and VD supplementation. This study reports the association between VD pathway-related genetics and ADA treatment. Further studies are needed to confirm these promising data.

Background: Ustekinumab (UST) has demonstrated effectiveness in treating patients with Crohn’s disease. Monitoring treatment response can improve disease management and reduce healthcare costs. We investigated whether UST trough levels (TLs), serum IL22, and Oncostatin M (OSM) levels could be early indicators of non-response by analysing their correlation with clinical and biochemical outcomes in CD. Methods: Patients with CD initiating UST treatment from October 2018 to September 2020 were enrolled at six Italian centres for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Clinical and biochemical data were collected at four time points: baseline, second subcutaneous (SC) dose, fourth SC dose, and 52 weeks. TLs were measured during maintenance, at the second SC dose, and at the fourth SC dose. IL-22 and OSM serum levels were assessed at baseline and the second SC dose. We analysed whether TLs, IL22 levels, and OSM serum levels were associated with clinical response, clinical remission, biochemical remission, and endoscopic remission using the appropriate statistical tests. Results: Out of eighty-four initially enrolled patients, five were lost to follow-up, and eleven discontinued the drug before 52 weeks. At the 52-week time point, 47% achieved biochemical remission based on faecal calprotectin levels, and 61.8% achieved clinical remission. TLs at the second SC dose significantly correlated with biochemical remission at the same time point (p = 0.011). However, TLs did not correlate with clinical remission. Baseline OSM levels did not correlate with biochemical or clinical remission or response. IL22 levels notably decreased during UST therapy (p = 0.000), but its values did not correlate with biochemical or clinical remission. Conclusions: UST is an effective therapy for patients with CD. TLs measured at the second SC dose significantly correlated with biochemical remission, emphasising their potential role in treatment monitoring. Levels of OSM and IL-22, despite a significant decrease in the latter during therapy, did not exhibit correlations with clinical or biochemical outcomes in our study. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

IBD-PODCAST was a global real-world study to assess suboptimal disease control (SDC) in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) using STRIDE-II criteria. To evaluate quality of life (QoL), disease characteristics and control in patients with SDC, comparing perspectives of patients and healthcare providers (HCPs) in the Italian subpopulation. IBD-PODCAST-Italy enrolled adult outpatients from 17 centers. The study used a combination of retrospective chart reviews and cross-sectional assessments to gather data on treatment, patient-reported outcomes (QoL, fatigue, work productivity) and clinical activity. Patient and HCP perceptions of disease control based on STRIDE-II criteria, which included clinical, laboratory and endoscopic findings were also assessed. SDC was identified in 53.4 % (95 % CI: 44-62.8 %) of CD and 49.0 % (95 % CI: 39.1-59.0 %) of UC patients. Those with SDC had lower short IBD questionnaire scores (45.9 ± 12.0) compared to optimal disease control (ODC) patients (57.4 ± 9.9). Extraintestinal manifestations and bowel urgency were more frequent in SDC patients. Physician-perceived SDC (14.5 %) was higher than patient-perceived SDC (8.8 %) and agreement between patient and HCP assessments was low. Patients with SDC experienced impaired QoL. The discrepancy between patient and physician perceptions of disease control, alongside objective measures, highlights the need for further research to optimize care and improve outcomes.

Background/Objectives: Vitamin D (VD) has immunoregulatory properties, generating interest in its potential to influence therapeutic outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), other than affecting the expression of genes encoding enzymes and transporters involved in drug metabolism and transport. This study investigated VD-related single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) as predictors of clinical responses in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) treated with vedolizumab (VDZ) or ustekinumab (UST) after 3 (T3) and 12 months (T12), as well as the achievement of fecal calprotectin (FC) levels < 250 mg/kg, a marker of mucosal healing. Methods: In this prospective study, 103 patients (67 CD, 36 UC) were enrolled, 40 receiving VDZ and 63 receiving UST. SNPs in the genes CYP24A1, GC, CYP27B1, and VD receptor (VDR) were analyzed via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and associated with clinical and laboratory outcomes. Results: UST therapy demonstrated a higher clinical response rate at T12 compared to VDZ (p = 0.03). A correlation was found between response at T3 and T12 (p = 0.0002). GC 1296 AC polymorphism negatively predicted response at T12, with 63.6% of non-responders carrying this genotype. CYP24A1 8620 AG was a negative predictor for achieving FC < 250 mg/kg (p = 0.045). CYP24A1 22776 CT and VDR Cdx2 GG increased the likelihood of presenting CD over UC (OR 3.40, p = 0.009 and OR 3.74, p = 0.047, respectively). Additionally, CYP27B1 −1260 GT and +2838 CT increased the likelihood of non-ileal CD (OR 3.13, p = 0.054; OR 7.02, p = 0.01). Conclusions: This study reveals associations between VD-SNPs, clinical response to VDZ and UST, and IBD phenotype and localization, supporting the development of personalized IBD treatment and warranting further validation.